claude/skills/implement/SKILL.md
Load code-style and task-specific skills, make the change described by the current context, then run /finalize for QA and commit. Use for ad-hoc changes when no plan file or improvements backlog governs the work, and when the user asks to "just implement", "implement directly", "implement without a plan", or "apply the change".
npx skillsauth add tobihagemann/turbo implementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Standard implementation flow: load style rules, make the change, run post-implementation QA.
At the start, use TaskCreate to create a task for each step:
/code-style skill/preview skill for UI/UX changes/finalize skill/code-style SkillRun the /code-style skill to load mirror, reuse, and symmetry rules before editing.
Scan the work for types that match available skills, matching against the richest context available: a plan's Implementation Steps if a plan is in conversation context, otherwise the user request, a prior skill's task description, or an improvement entry. For each unambiguous match, run the skill via the Skill tool. For example, if the work includes "add a Drizzle migration" and a skill exists whose triggers reference Drizzle migrations, load it. If a work type has no matching skill trigger, do not load a generic skill.
If unsure, do not load.
Apply the change described by the current context — the user request, a prior skill's task description, or an improvement entry. Keep the edit scoped to what the context describes. If the scope balloons beyond what the context specified, stop and confirm scope before continuing.
If a Verification section is in conversation context (e.g., from a plan file), execute the commands, smoke checks, or MCP tool invocations it specifies. If a check fails, run the /investigate skill. If a check is blocked by a dependency, unclear requirement, or environmental issue, use AskUserQuestion to surface the blocker and let the user choose how to proceed. If no Verification section is in context, skip this step.
/preview Skill for UI/UX ChangesIf the change touches a user-facing surface (UI components, styles, templates, markup, user-facing routes or screens), run the /preview skill so the user can try it firsthand before QA. When it is unclear whether the change is user-facing, use AskUserQuestion to ask whether to preview rather than skipping silently. Skip this step for changes with no user-facing surface (backend-only, CLI, library, build or config).
/finalize SkillWhen a plan file governs the work, hold this step until every Implementation Step has been applied, and continue to the next Implementation Step at every earlier boundary.
Run the /finalize skill.
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
git commit, git push, and PR creation to Step 6..turbo/ content (filenames, requirement IDs, shell references, headings) in code or comments. .turbo/ is gitignored, so these references would be opaque to anyone reading without local copies.development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", or "what's our worst code". Analysis-only — does not modify code.
development
Run a multi-agent review of code comments and markdown documentation for unnecessary content, then fix the issues. Covers what-restating comments, name-mirroring doc comments, status-update prose, and other documentation noise. Use when the user asks to "simplify docs", "simplify documentation", "clean up comments", "clean up docs", "review documentation", "strip unnecessary comments", "reduce doc noise", or "run simplify-docs".