skills/implement/SKILL.md
Load code-style rules, make the change described by the current context, then run /finalize for QA and commit. Use for ad-hoc changes when no plan file or improvements backlog governs the work, and when the user asks to "just implement", "implement directly", "implement without a plan", or "apply the change".
npx skillsauth add tobihagemann/turbo implementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Standard implementation flow: load style rules, make the change, run post-implementation QA.
At the start, use TaskCreate to create a task for each step:
/code-style skill/finalize skill/code-style SkillRun the /code-style skill to load mirror, reuse, and symmetry rules before editing.
Apply the change described by the current context — the user request, a prior skill's task description, or an improvement entry. Keep the edit scoped to what the context describes. If the scope balloons beyond what the context specified, stop and confirm scope before continuing.
If a Verification section is in conversation context (e.g., from a plan file), execute the commands, smoke checks, or MCP tool invocations it specifies. If a check fails, run the /investigate skill. If a check is blocked by a dependency, unclear requirement, or environmental issue, use AskUserQuestion to surface the blocker and let the user choose how to proceed. If no Verification section is in context, skip this step.
/finalize SkillRun the /finalize skill.
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
git commit, git push, and PR creation to Step 4.development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", or "what's our worst code". Analysis-only — does not modify code.
development
Run a multi-agent review of code comments and markdown documentation for unnecessary content, then fix the issues. Covers what-restating comments, name-mirroring doc comments, status-update prose, and other documentation noise. Use when the user asks to "simplify docs", "simplify documentation", "clean up comments", "clean up docs", "review documentation", "strip unnecessary comments", "reduce doc noise", or "run simplify-docs".