skills/finalize/SKILL.md
Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to "finalize implementation", "finalize changes", "wrap up implementation", "finish up", "ready to commit", or "run QA workflow".
npx skillsauth add tobihagemann/turbo finalizeInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Post-implementation QA workflow: tests, code polishing, commit, and self-improvement.
At the start, use TaskCreate to create a task for each phase:
/polish-code skill/update-changelog skill/self-improve skill/polish-code SkillRun the /polish-code skill for the current changes.
/update-changelog SkillRun the /update-changelog skill.
/self-improve SkillRun the /self-improve skill for the current session. Always run this phase even if the session seemed routine.
Examine the staged changes and evaluate whether they should be split into multiple commits, branches, and PRs for reviewability.
Detect the repository's default branch via gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name'. Check the current branch name and whether a PR already exists for it using gh pr view. If a PR exists, read its title and description to understand the branch's purpose. This context informs which changes belong on the current branch and which should be split off.
Run git diff --cached --stat and git diff --cached to understand the scope. Categorize changes along three dimensions:
A split is warranted when the staged changes contain multiple reviewable units. Each unit should be independently understandable, testable, and revertable. When deciding group boundaries, consider whether a reviewer could evaluate each group without needing context from the others.
Output the split analysis as text.
If changes form a single cohesive unit, note this and run the /ship skill.
If changes span multiple reviewable units, propose an ordered list of groups. For each group, specify:
Use AskUserQuestion to let the user choose: ship as a single commit/PR, or split.
/ship skill/split-and-ship skillThen use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
.env, credentials, API keys). Warn if detected.git diff internally as needed.development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.
development
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", or "what's our worst code". Analysis-only — does not modify code.
development
Run a multi-agent review of code comments and markdown documentation for unnecessary content, then fix the issues. Covers what-restating comments, name-mirroring doc comments, status-update prose, and other documentation noise. Use when the user asks to "simplify docs", "simplify documentation", "clean up comments", "clean up docs", "review documentation", "strip unnecessary comments", "reduce doc noise", or "run simplify-docs".