plugins/iterative-engineering/skills/implementation-wrapup/SKILL.md
Complete a feature branch with test verification and PR creation. Triggers: "finish up", "create a PR", "wrap up the feature". Also invoked by iterative:implementing after all tasks are complete.
npx skillsauth add tmchow/tmc-marketplace implementation-wrapupInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Completes development with verification, optional review, and PR creation.
iterative:implementing skill completes all tasksWhen invoked from iterative:implementing, skip this phase — all code reviews are already complete.
When invoked standalone:
AskUserQuestion (Claude Code) or request_user_input (Codex): A) Full code review (recommended), B) Skip review.code-review skill (1+ rounds).Present an interactive choice to the user:
Option A — Push + PR: Push branch with -u, run gh pr create. If PR exists, show existing PR URL. If no PR, create one following repo conventions. Return PR URL.
Option B — Push only: Push branch, report remote URL.
Option C — Keep: Report branch preserved locally.
Option D — Discard: Require typed confirmation ("discard [branch-name]"). Delete branch (and worktree if applicable).
When creating a PR:
## Implementation Wrapup
### Verification
- Tests: PASS (N tests)
- Uncommitted changes: None / Committed
### Code Review
- Status: Completed / Skipped
- Issues addressed: N
### Summary
- Branch: feature/my-feature
- Base: main
- Commits: N
- Files changed: M
### Options
A) Push + Create PR (recommended)
B) Push only
C) Keep branch locally
D) Discard work
What would you like to do?
Returns:
testing
Turn requirements into a structured implementation plan with subtasks, dependencies, file paths, and test scenarios. Triggers: "create a plan", "tech planning", "write a tech plan", or has requirements ready to formalize.
data-ai
Investigate open questions through parallel research — prior art, constraints, competitive analysis. Triggers: "research this", "investigate questions", "resolve open questions", "look into this", or when a PRD has unresolved questions.
development
Review PRDs, brainstorm docs, tech plans, design docs, specs, or any planning document for issues. This skill should be used whenever the user wants feedback, critique, or a quality check on an existing planning or requirements document — even if they don't use the word "review." Common triggers include: "review the plan", "check the PRD", "critique my tech plan", "what's wrong with this plan", "poke holes in the requirements", "is this plan solid", "take a look at this spec", "give feedback on the brainstorm", or pointing to a doc file and asking if anything is off. Also triggers after writing a PRD or tech plan (to review what was just created), or when invoked by brainstorming or tech-planning skills. Do NOT trigger for code review (PRs, diffs, source files), writing/creating new plans, debugging, or reviewing non-planning documents (READMEs, CLAUDE.md, test coverage).
development
Execute a tech plan with dependency-aware batching, TDD, code review, and PR creation. Triggers: "implement the plan", "start building", "start implementing", "execute the plan".