.claude/skills/debugging/SKILL.md
Systematic debugging framework ensuring root cause investigation before fixes. Includes four-phase debugging process, backward call stack tracing, multi-layer validation, and verification protocols. Use when encountering bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, performance issues, or before claiming work complete. Prevents random fixes, masks over symptoms, and false completion claims.
npx skillsauth add the1studio/theone-training-skills DebuggingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Comprehensive debugging framework combining systematic investigation, root cause tracing, defense-in-depth validation, and verification protocols.
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Find the root cause, fix at source, validate at every layer, verify before claiming success.
Always use for: Test failures, bugs, unexpected behavior, performance issues, build failures, integration problems, before claiming work complete
Especially when: Under time pressure, "quick fix" seems obvious, tried multiple fixes, don't fully understand issue, about to claim success
references/systematic-debugging.md)Four-phase framework ensuring proper investigation:
Key rule: Complete each phase before proceeding. No fixes without Phase 1.
Load when: Any bug/issue requiring investigation and fix
references/root-cause-tracing.md)Trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger.
Technique: When error appears deep in execution, trace backward level-by-level until finding source where invalid data originated. Fix at source, not at symptom.
Includes: scripts/find-polluter.sh for bisecting test pollution
Load when: Error deep in call stack, unclear where invalid data originated
references/defense-in-depth.md)Validate at every layer data passes through. Make bugs impossible.
Four layers: Entry validation → Business logic → Environment guards → Debug instrumentation
Load when: After finding root cause, need to add comprehensive validation
references/verification.md)Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success.
Iron law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
Run the command. Read the output. Then claim the result.
Load when: About to claim work complete, fixed, or passing
Bug → systematic-debugging.md (Phase 1-4)
Error deep in stack? → root-cause-tracing.md (trace backward)
Found root cause? → defense-in-depth.md (add layers)
About to claim success? → verification.md (verify first)
Stop and follow process if thinking:
All mean: Return to systematic process.
development
Comprehensive document creation, editing, and analysis with support for tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, and text extraction. When Claude needs to work with professional documents (.docx files) for: (1) Creating new documents, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with tracked changes, (4) Adding comments, or any other document tasks
development
Search technical documentation using executable scripts to detect query type, fetch from llms.txt sources (context7.com), and analyze results. Use when user needs: (1) Topic-specific documentation (features/components/concepts), (2) Library/framework documentation, (3) GitHub repository analysis, (4) Documentation discovery with automated agent distribution strategy
development
Deploy and manage cloud infrastructure on Cloudflare (Workers, R2, D1, KV, Pages, Durable Objects, Browser Rendering), Docker containers, and Google Cloud Platform (Compute Engine, GKE, Cloud Run, App Engine, Cloud Storage). Use when deploying serverless functions to the edge, configuring edge computing solutions, managing Docker containers and images, setting up CI/CD pipelines, optimizing cloud infrastructure costs, implementing global caching strategies, working with cloud databases, or building cloud-native applications.
development
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.