packages/skills-catalog/skills/(development)/rails-dev/SKILL.md
Opinionated Rails conventions: rich models, concerns, CRUD-everything, state-as-records, minimal dependencies, Minitest with fixtures. Load this skill BEFORE any code-level thinking, not only before editing a file. It is required the moment a task touches Rails code in ANY way: designing or even just discussing a data model, schema, migration, entity, association, field, validation, class, or method name; writing, planning, reviewing, analyzing, testing, debugging, or refactoring; or proposing any model, table, column, route, or code snippet inline in chat. If you are about to name a model or sketch a column you are already in scope, even in an exploratory back-and-forth where no file is written yet. Do not let a "we're just discussing" framing defer it. Do NOT use for non-Rails backends, NestJS, or general architecture (use nestjs-modular-monolith or coding-guidelines).
npx skillsauth add tech-leads-club/agent-skills rails-devInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
resource :closure not post :close)Closure model instead of closed: booleanCloseable, Watchable, Commentablecreate!), handle failures at the boundary, not by pre-guarding (references/error-handling.md)This table is an index, not the content. The conventions live in the reference files, not in this table, the codebase, or general Rails knowledge. Match the task to the rows below and read those files end to end before you design, write, review, or analyze the code. Reading the row is not reading the reference; guessing from the codebase is how the wrong convention gets shipped.
| Task | Reference |
|------|-----------|
| Models, validations, associations, business logic | references/model.md |
| Custom validators, validation rules reused across models | references/validator.md |
| Error handling, rescue boundaries, reporting, retries | references/error-handling.md |
| Controllers, CRUD actions | references/crud.md |
| Routes, config/routes.rb, resource mapping | references/routes.md |
| Concerns, shared behavior | references/concerns.md |
| State tracking (not booleans) | references/state-records.md |
| Authentication, authorization, sessions, IDOR scoping | references/auth.md |
| Database migrations | references/migration.md |
| Minitest, fixtures, testing | references/test.md |
| Views, ERB, partials, helpers, presentation logic | references/view.md |
| Turbo Frames, Turbo Streams, real-time | references/turbo.md |
| Stimulus controllers, JS sprinkles | references/stimulus.md |
| Background jobs, Solid Queue | references/jobs.md |
| Concurrency, fibers, Async, external I/O | references/async.md |
| Mailers, email notifications | references/mailer.md |
| Fragment caching, HTTP caching | references/caching.md |
| REST API, JSON responses | references/api.md |
| Multi-tenancy, account scoping | references/multi-tenant.md |
| Event tracking, activity logs | references/events.md |
| Webhooks (inbound/outbound), inbox, idempotency | references/webhooks.md |
| Code review, consistency check | references/review.md |
| HTTP clients, external APIs, Faraday | references/http-client.md |
| Logging, log messages, Rails.logger | references/logging.md |
These are cross-cutting rules: they apply to every file, regardless of area. They do not replace the references. For anything area-specific (models, controllers, jobs, views, tests, …) you MUST ALWAYS load the matching reference from the table above before writing or reviewing the code.
Use an expanded if/else over a value-returning guard clause. A guard clause at the top of a method is fine when the body is non-trivial.
# Don't: value-returning guard clause for a simple branch
def status_label
return "closed" if closed?
"open"
end
# Do: expanded if/else
def status_label
if closed?
"closed"
else
"open"
end
end
Class methods, then public (with initialize first), then private. Order methods vertically by invocation: a caller sits above its callees.
# Don't: callee above its caller, public after private
class Signup
def create_member = Member.create!(email:)
def call = create_member
end
# Do: class method, then the caller, then its callees
class Signup
def self.call(...) = new(...).call
def call = create_member
private
def create_member = Member.create!(email:)
end
No blank line after private; indent the methods beneath it. A module of only private methods marks private at the top with a blank line after, not indented.
# Don't: blank line after private, methods not indented
class Card
private
def closure_exists? = closure.present?
end
# Do: no blank line, indented under private
class Card
private
def closure_exists? = closure.present?
end
Use ! only when a non-bang counterpart exists (like save/save!). Never add ! just to flag a destructive or important action.
# Don't: unpaired bang used to signal "this is destructive"
def revoke! = update!(revoked_at: Time.current)
# Do: plain domain verb; the ! belongs to the paired persistence call
def revoke = update!(revoked_at: Time.current)
Public methods are domain verbs. When a verb collides with a scope, predicate, or core method (Kernel#fail), prefix with mark_ (no bang): mark_failed. Class and concept naming live in references/model.md.
# Don't: mark_ prefix when the plain verb is free
def mark_published = update!(published_at: Time.current)
# Do: plain verb; reserve mark_ for a real collision (fail -> Kernel#fail)
def publish = update!(published_at: Time.current)
def mark_failed = update!(failed_at: Time.current)
Default to none. Most comments are noise: the code and naming should carry the meaning.
Add one only when the code can't carry it:
Don't:
# ----- some_method ----- banners in tests).When a comment earns its place:
# Don't: restates what the code already says; section banner
# increment the attempts counter
attempts += 1
# ----- private helpers -----
# Do: explains the non-obvious why
# Circle returns 422 on duplicate emails, so we reconcile instead of recreating.
reconcile_member(email)
Don't swallow errors. Make the failure accessible to the caller, usually by recording it on a returned object rather than logging and returning false. Full handling conventions (record vs raise, reporting, wrapping, retries) live in references/error-handling.md.
# Don't: swallow the error; the caller can't tell it failed
def provision_circle
circle_client.create_community_member(...)
rescue Circle::AdminClient::ApiError
false
end
# Do: record the failure on the returned object
def provision_circle
circle_client.create_community_member(...)
circle_access.mark_successful(external_id: response.dig(:community_member, :id))
rescue Circle::AdminClient::ApiError => e
circle_access.mark_failed(error: e.message) # caller checks access.failed?
end
These conventions are adapted from, and may diverge from, these reference apps:
tools
Reviews a GitHub pull request and posts inline comments plus one consolidated summary, adapting to any codebase by discovering the project's own test runner, requirement specs, and architecture conventions before running six specialized review agents in parallel. Stack-agnostic across language and framework; targets GitHub PRs via the gh CLI. Use when the user says "review PR 128", "review this PR", "code review this PR", or "check this pull request". Do NOT use for creating PRs or responding to review comments (use gh-address-comments), or debugging failing CI checks (use gh-fix-ci).
testing
Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases — Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute. Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Creates atomic tasks with verification criteria, atomic git commits, and requirement traceability. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), persistent decision log (STATE.md), and test-coverage-matrix-driven tests, plus a self-improving lessons layer that turns verification failures into reusable project-local guidance. Stack-agnostic. Use when (1) Planning features (requirements, design, task breakdown), (2) Implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) Validating or verifying an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for architecture decomposition analysis (use architecture skills) or technical design docs (use create-technical-design-doc).
development
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) specialist — the technical, on-page publishing work that makes a given page or site discoverable, understandable, trustworthy, quotable, and fresh for AI answer engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT Search, Bing Copilot, Perplexity). Use when asked to 'optimize this page/site for GEO', 'optimize for AI search / answer engines', 'get my page cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity', 'improve AI visibility/citability', 'write an llms.txt', 'add citation-ready structure or schema for AI answers', 'otimizar para busca com IA', or to audit/create/improve a codebase for generative search. Do NOT use for AI-driven SEO content strategy or programmatic pages at scale (use ai-seo), classic keyword/SERP ranking (use seo), accessibility (use web-accessibility), or multi-area site audits (use web-quality-audit).
testing
Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases — Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute. Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Creates atomic tasks with verification criteria, atomic git commits, and requirement traceability. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), persistent decision log (STATE.md), and test-coverage-matrix-driven tests, plus a self-improving lessons layer that turns verification failures into reusable project-local guidance. Stack-agnostic. Use when (1) Planning features (requirements, design, task breakdown), (2) Implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) Validating or verifying an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for architecture decomposition analysis (use architecture skills) or technical design docs (use create-technical-design-doc).