skills/criminal-case-analyzer/SKILL.md
Systematic criminal case analysis providing structured evaluation of fact patterns, applicable offences, evidence strength, burden of proof, and defense/prosecution strategies
npx skillsauth add swarochish/indian-law-plugin criminal-case-analyzerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Reusable analytical capability for systematic criminal case analysis, providing structured evaluation of:
Objective: Extract and structure key facts
Process:
1. **Chronological Timeline**:
- When did each event occur?
- Sequence of events leading to offence
- Post-offence actions
2. **Actor Identification**:
- Victim(s): Name, age, relationship to accused
- Accused: Name, age, occupation, antecedents
- Witnesses: Eyewitnesses, formal witnesses (police, doctor)
- Third parties: Any other relevant persons
3. **Location Analysis**:
- Where did offence occur?
- Jurisdiction (determines police station, court)
- Public vs private place (may affect offence classification)
4. **Actus Reus (Physical Act)**:
- What physical act was committed?
- How was it committed? (Weapon? Force? Deception?)
- What was the result? (Death, injury, loss)
5. **Mens Rea (Mental State)**:
- Intention to commit act?
- Knowledge of consequences?
- Negligence or recklessness?
- Premeditation vs sudden provocation?
6. **Motive**:
- Why did accused commit act? (Relevant but not essential)
- Strengthens prosecution case if established
Output: Structured fact summary with timeline, actors, actus reus, mens rea
Objective: Identify all applicable offences
Process:
1. **Determine Applicable Law**:
- If offence occurred BEFORE July 1, 2024: Use IPC 1860
- If offence occurred ON OR AFTER July 1, 2024: Use BNS 2023
- Read IL-CRIM-IPC-BNS-TRANSITION.md for mapping
2. **Primary Offence Analysis**:
- Based on actus reus and mens rea, identify main offence
- Examples:
- Death caused + intention → Murder (IPC 302 / BNS 103)
- Death caused + knowledge but no intention → Culpable homicide not amounting to murder (IPC 304 / BNS 105)
- Sexual assault → Rape (IPC 376 / BNS 64-71)
- Property taken + force → Robbery (IPC 392 / BNS 309)
3. **Related Offences**:
- Identify all additional offences committed
- Example: Rape case may include:
- Rape (IPC 376 / BNS 64)
- Criminal intimidation (IPC 506 / BNS 351)
- Wrongful confinement (IPC 342 / BNS 127)
4. **Essential Ingredients Check**:
- For each identified offence, list essential ingredients
- Read relevant protocol (e.g., IL-CRIM-MURDER.md)
- Extract ingredients from protocol
5. **Fact-to-Ingredient Mapping**:
- Map available facts to each ingredient
- Identify which ingredients are established
- Identify gaps or weaknesses
Output: List of applicable offences with ingredients and fact mapping
Objective: Assess strength and admissibility of evidence
Process:
1. **Evidence Categorization**:
**A. Oral Evidence**:
- Eyewitness testimony
- Victim statement
- Expert opinion (doctor, FSL)
- Character evidence
**B. Documentary Evidence**:
- FIR copy
- Dying declaration
- Medical reports
- Contracts, letters (in fraud/cheating cases)
**C. Electronic Evidence**:
- WhatsApp messages
- CCTV footage
- Call detail records (CDR)
- GPS data
- Social media posts
**D. Physical Evidence**:
- Weapon (murder weapon, knife)
- Stolen goods (theft/robbery cases)
- Fingerprints, DNA
- Blood-stained clothes
2. **Admissibility Analysis** (Use IL-CRIM-EVIDENCE-ADMISSIBILITY.md):
For each piece of evidence:
**Step 1: Relevancy** (Section 5 Evidence Act/BSA)
- Is it fact in issue or relevant fact?
- If not relevant → INADMISSIBLE
**Step 2: Hearsay Check** (Section 60)
- Is witness testifying to what they personally saw/heard?
- OR is it hearsay (heard from someone else)?
- If hearsay → Check exceptions (dying declaration, admission, etc.)
**Step 3: Electronic Evidence** (Section 65B)
- If electronic → Section 65B certificate required (Anvar P.V. case)
- Without certificate → INADMISSIBLE
**Step 4: Confession Check** (Sections 24-30)
- Confession to police → ALWAYS INADMISSIBLE (Section 25)
- Confession before Magistrate (Section 164) → Admissible if voluntary
**Step 5: Primary vs Secondary** (Sections 62-65)
- Original document (primary) preferred
- Photocopy (secondary) only if original unavailable (Section 65)
3. **Strength Assessment**:
**Direct Evidence**:
- Eyewitness saw accused commit crime → Strong if credible
- Check witness credibility: Interested witness? Related? Contradictions?
**Circumstantial Evidence**:
- No direct evidence, only circumstances (motive, opportunity, recovery)
- Apply Panchsheel Principles (Sharad Sarda case):
1. Circumstances fully established?
2. Consistent only with guilt?
3. Conclusive nature?
4. Exclude every hypothesis except guilt?
5. Chain complete (no missing link)?
- If any principle fails → Weak circumstantial case
**Corroboration**:
- Single witness enough? OR corroboration needed?
- Dying declaration: Can be sole basis if truthful (Laxman case)
- Sexual assault: Victim testimony sufficient; no corroboration required
4. **Chain of Custody** (Physical Evidence):
- Seizure → Sealing → FSL → Court production
- Any break in chain → Evidence may be unreliable
Output: Evidence inventory with admissibility status and strength rating
Objective: Determine who must prove what and to what standard
Process (Use IL-CRIM-BURDEN-PROOF.md):
1. **General Rule**:
- **Burden on PROSECUTION** to prove guilt
- **Standard**: BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT (very high standard)
2. **What Prosecution Must Prove**:
- All essential ingredients of offence
- Actus reus (physical act committed)
- Mens rea (intention/knowledge/negligence)
- Identity of accused
- No general exception applies
3. **Burden on Accused** (Section 105):
- **If accused claims general exception** (self-defense, insanity, mistake, etc.)
- **Standard**: PREPONDERANCE OF PROBABILITIES (balance of probabilities - lower than beyond reasonable doubt)
- Accused need NOT prove beyond reasonable doubt, only show "more likely than not"
4. **Presumptions** (Sections 113A, 113B, 114):
**Section 113A: Abetment of Suicide by Married Woman**:
- If married woman commits suicide within 7 years + husband/relatives subjected her to cruelty
- **Presumption**: Husband/relatives abetted suicide
- **Effect**: Reverse burden on accused
**Section 113B: Dowry Death**:
- If woman dies within 7 years of marriage + cruelty/harassment for dowry proved
- **Presumption**: Husband/relatives caused dowry death
- **Effect**: Reverse burden on accused
5. **Practical Application**:
**Example: Murder with Self-Defense Claim**:
- Prosecution must prove:
1. Accused caused death (beyond reasonable doubt)
2. With intention to cause death (beyond reasonable doubt)
- Accused must prove:
1. Self-defense (preponderance of probabilities)
2. Imminent threat, no retreat, proportionate force
**Example: Dowry Death**:
- Prosecution must prove:
1. Woman died within 7 years of marriage
2. Cruelty/harassment for dowry occurred soon before death
- Then presumption arises under Section 113B
- Accused must rebut presumption (prove innocence)
Output: Burden allocation matrix showing who proves what and to what standard
Objective: Develop prosecution or defense strategy
If perspective is Prosecution:
1. **Case Strengths**:
- List strongest evidence
- Direct evidence available?
- Credible witnesses?
- Forensic evidence (DNA, fingerprints)?
2. **Case Weaknesses**:
- Identify gaps
- Missing evidence?
- Witness credibility issues?
- Circumstantial evidence chain incomplete?
3. **Evidence Collection Priority**:
- What additional evidence needed?
- Witnesses not yet examined?
- Forensic tests pending?
- Section 65B certificates obtained?
4. **Anticipated Defenses**:
- What will defense argue?
- Self-defense claim likely?
- Alibi expected?
- Exception under IPC/BNS?
5. **Prosecution Strategy**:
- How to prove each ingredient?
- Witness examination order
- Documentary evidence production plan
- Cross-examination preparation
- Closing argument themes
If perspective is Defense:
1. **Prosecution Weaknesses**:
- Where is prosecution case weak?
- Unreliable witnesses?
- Evidence inadmissible?
- Ingredients not proved?
2. **Defense Options**:
**Option A: Challenge Prosecution Case**:
- Show reasonable doubt
- Highlight contradictions
- Challenge admissibility
- Cross-examination strategy
- NO burden on defense to prove innocence
**Option B: Affirmative Defense (Exception)**:
- Claim general exception (self-defense, insanity, etc.)
- Read IL-CRIM-GENERAL-EXCEPTIONS.md
- Gather evidence to prove exception
- Remember: Burden on accused (Section 105)
- Standard: Preponderance (easier than beyond reasonable doubt)
**Option C: Alibi**:
- Accused was elsewhere when offence occurred
- Alibi witnesses
- Documentary proof (bills, tickets, CCTV)
3. **Cross-Examination Strategy**:
- Identify prosecution witnesses to discredit
- Prepare leading questions
- Confront with prior inconsistent statements (Section 161)
- Show bias/interest
4. **Section 313 Preparation**:
- Anticipate incriminating circumstances to be put
- Prepare coherent explanations
- Right to remain silent vs duty to explain
5. **Defense Evidence**:
- Defense witnesses needed?
- Should accused testify? (Pros and cons)
- Expert evidence to rebut prosecution experts?
Output: Comprehensive strategy document with action items
Objective: Identify risks and mitigation strategies
Process:
1. **Legal Risks**:
- What is worst-case outcome?
- Maximum sentence for offences charged?
- Likelihood of conviction based on evidence?
2. **Procedural Risks**:
- Delay in trial?
- Witness turning hostile?
- Evidence degradation (physical evidence)?
3. **Strategic Risks**:
- For Defense: Alibi breaks down under cross-examination?
- For Prosecution: Key witness credibility destroyed?
4. **Mitigation Strategies**:
- How to reduce risks?
- Backup witnesses?
- Alternative defenses?
- Plea bargaining options? (Section 265A-265L CrPC / 290-305 BNSS)
Output: Risk matrix with mitigation plan
# CRIMINAL CASE ANALYSIS REPORT
## CASE SUMMARY
[One-paragraph overview]
## FACT ANALYSIS
### Timeline
| Date/Time | Event | Actors Involved |
|-----------|-------|-----------------|
| [Date] | [Event description] | [Actors] |
### Key Facts
- **Victim**: [Details]
- **Accused**: [Details]
- **Actus Reus**: [Physical act]
- **Mens Rea**: [Mental state]
- **Motive**: [If established]
## OFFENCE ANALYSIS
### Applicable Law
- Offence Date: [Date]
- Applicable Statute: [IPC 1860 / BNS 2023]
### Offences Identified
#### Primary Offence: [Offence Name]
**Statutory Provision**: [IPC/BNS Section]
**Punishment**: [Imprisonment + Fine details]
**Essential Ingredients**:
1. [Ingredient 1]
- Status: Established / Not Established / Uncertain
- Evidence: [Supporting evidence]
2. [Ingredient 2]
- Status: [As above]
- Evidence: [As above]
#### Related Offences
- [Offence 2]: [Section]
- [Offence 3]: [Section]
## EVIDENCE EVALUATION
### Evidence Inventory
| Evidence Type | Description | Admissible? | Strength | Notes |
|---------------|-------------|-------------|----------|-------|
| Oral | Eyewitness X | Yes | Strong | Credible, no contradictions |
| Documentary | Medical report | Yes | Strong | Corroborates injury |
| Electronic | WhatsApp msgs | No | N/A | No Section 65B certificate |
| Physical | Murder weapon | Yes | Medium | Chain of custody gap |
### Circumstantial Evidence Analysis
[If applicable, apply Panchsheel Principles]
## BURDEN OF PROOF
### On Prosecution (Beyond Reasonable Doubt)
- [Element 1 to prove]
- [Element 2 to prove]
### On Accused (Preponderance of Probabilities)
- [If exception claimed: Element to prove]
### Presumptions Applicable
- [Section 113A / 113B / etc. if applicable]
## STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS
### [For Prosecution / For Defense]
**Strengths**:
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]
**Weaknesses**:
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]
**Recommended Approach**:
[Detailed strategy]
**Action Items**:
1. [Action 1 with timeline]
2. [Action 2 with timeline]
## RISK ASSESSMENT
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | High/Medium/Low | High/Medium/Low | [Strategy] |
## NEXT STEPS
1. **Immediate** (0-7 days): [Actions]
2. **Short-term** (1-4 weeks): [Actions]
3. **Long-term** (1-3 months): [Actions]
## PROTOCOL REFERENCES
- [Protocol 1]
- [Protocol 2]
This skill is used by:
Can be invoked via:
/criminal-law-advice commandEnd of Skill: criminal_case_analyzer
testing
Analyze writ petition viability - assess locus standi, alternative remedy, grounds for judicial review, appropriate writ type, and likelihood of success
documentation
Determine which type of writ applies to a legal situation, advise whether to approach Supreme Court or High Court, assess locus standi, and evaluate alternative remedy doctrine
development
Draft complete, legally precise RTI applications under Right to Information Act 2005 with specific information requests, proper addressing, and compliance with statutory format
tools
Calculate precise limitation periods under Limitation Act 1963 including COVID-19 extension (531 days), exclusions, and extensions. This skill should be used when determining filing deadlines for legal proceedings, appeals, applications, or when analyzing whether a claim is time-barred.