swarochish/contract-analyzer

Contract Analyzer Skill

Purpose

Reusable analytical capability for systematically analyzing contract formation, validity, performance obligations, and potential issues under Indian Contract Act 1872 and related statutes.

When to Use

• User asks about contract validity
• Need to check if agreement is enforceable
• Analyzing contract terms and obligations
• Identifying defects in formation
• Assessing compliance with statutory requirements

Knowledge Base

Protocols:

• IL-CONTRACT-FORMATION
• IL-CONTRACT-CAPACITY
• IL-CONTRACT-FREE-CONSENT
• IL-CONTRACT-LEGALITY
• IL-CONTRACT-VOID-VOIDABLE
• IL-CONTRACT-PERFORMANCE

Analytical Framework

Phase 1: Contract Identification

Input Required:

1. Contract text or description
2. Parties (names, type - individual/company, age if relevant)
3. Subject matter (goods, services, property)
4. Consideration (amount, terms)
5. Date of formation
6. Oral or written

Output: Contract classification (type, special contract category)

Phase 2: Validity Analysis (Section 10 Elements)

Systematic Check:

Element 1: Offer and Acceptance (Sections 2(a), 2(b))

• Offer exists: Clear proposal to do/abstain from doing something?
• Acceptance: Unconditional assent communicated to proposer?
• Consensus ad idem: Meeting of minds?
• Communication: Properly communicated (Section 4 postal rule if applicable)?

Defects:

• No valid offer (invitation to treat mistaken for offer)
• Conditional acceptance (counter-offer - Section 7)
• Acceptance not communicated
• Cross-offers (no contract)

Element 2: Consideration (Sections 2(d), 25)

• Present: Something given at time of contract?
• Past: Something already done (valid if at promisor's desire)?
• Future: Promise to do something?
• From promisee or third party: Can move from any person (Chinnaya v. Ramaya)?
• Real but need not be adequate: Some value, but adequacy not relevant?

Section 25 Exceptions (no consideration required):

1. Love and affection (written, registered, near relation)
2. Past voluntary services (written, signed)
3. Time-barred debt promise (written, signed)

Defects:

• No consideration (unless Section 25 exception)
• Illusory consideration
• Past consideration (not at promisor's desire)

Element 3: Capacity (Sections 10-12)

• Age of majority: Not minor (under 18)?
• Sound mind: Capable of understanding + forming rational judgment?
• Not disqualified: Not alien enemy, undischarged insolvent, convict during sentence?

Mohori Bibee Principle: Minor's agreement VOID ab initio (not voidable)

Defects:

• Minor party (VOID)
• Unsound mind (lack capacity at contract time)
• Disqualified person

Element 4: Free Consent (Sections 13-22)

Section 14: Consent free when not caused by:

A. Coercion (Section 15):

• Committing/threatening IPC offense?
• Unlawful detention/threat of detention of property?

B. Undue Influence (Section 16):

• Dominant position exists (authority, fiduciary, mental weakness)?
• Position used to obtain unfair advantage?
• Section 16(3) presumption if dominant + unconscionable?

C. Fraud (Section 17):

• False suggestion (believed true by speaker)?
• Active concealment of material fact?
• Promise without intention to perform?
• Act fitted to deceive?
• Act declared fraudulent by law?

D. Misrepresentation (Section 18):

• Innocent false statement (speaker believes true)?
• Breach of duty causing other party error?
• Party causing consent has no knowledge/belief in truth?

E. Mistake (Section 20-22):

• Bilateral mistake of fact (essential to agreement) → VOID
• Unilateral mistake: Generally valid (except identity, non est factum)
• Mistake of law: Valid (Section 21)

Defects:

• Vitiated consent (coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence) → Voidable (Section 19)
• Mutual mistake of fact → Void (Section 20)

Element 5: Lawful Object and Consideration (Section 23)

Void if:

• Forbidden by law
• Defeats provisions of law
• Fraudulent
• Involves injury to person/property
• Immoral
• Opposed to public policy

Section 27: Restraint of trade void (exception: sale of goodwill - reasonable restraint) Section 28: Restraint of legal proceedings void (exception: arbitration valid) Section 30: Wagering agreements void

Defects:

• Unlawful object/consideration → Void
• Restraint of trade (Section 27) → Void
• Wagering (Section 30) → Void

Element 6: Not Expressly Void (Sections 26-30)

• Section 26: Restraint of marriage → Void
• Section 27: Restraint of trade → Void (with exceptions)
• Section 28: Restraint of legal proceedings → Void (except arbitration)
• Section 29: Uncertainty/wagering → Void
• Section 30: Wagering agreements → Void

Defects: Falls under Sections 26-30 → Void

Element 7: Certainty (Section 29)

• Terms definite and ascertainable?
• No vagueness or ambiguity?
• Performance possible to determine?

Defects: Vague/uncertain terms → Void (Section 29)

Element 8: Possibility of Performance (Section 56)

• Performance possible (not impossible by nature)?
• Not forbidden by law?

Defects: Impossible act → Void (Section 56)

Phase 3: Classification Determination

Decision Tree:

1. All Section 10 elements satisfied → VALID (enforceable)

2. Element defect - vitiated consent (coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence) → VOIDABLE at option of aggrieved party (Section 19, 19A)

3. Element defect - capacity (minor) → VOID AB INITIO (Mohori Bibee)

4. Element defect - unlawful object, restraint, uncertainty, impossibility → VOID (no effect)

Phase 4: Consequences and Remedies

If VALID:

• Enforceable by both parties
• Performance required per terms
• Breach remedies available (damages, specific performance, injunction, rescission)

If VOIDABLE:

• Aggrieved party options:
  • Rescind (Section 64): Cancel + restore status quo
  • Affirm: Continue with contract
• Section 19: Voidable when consent caused by coercion, fraud, misrepresentation
• Section 19A: Voidable when consent caused by undue influence
• Remedies: Rescission + damages (if fraud/breach)

If VOID:

• No legal effect
• Cannot be enforced
• Section 65: Restitution (restore advantage received)
• Exception: In pari delicto (both equally guilty) - no restitution

Phase 5: Performance Obligations Analysis

(If contract VALID)

Section 37-50 Analysis:

Who Must Perform? (Section 40)

• Promisor himself (if personal skill/confidence required)
• Promisor or agent (if not personal)
• Legal representatives (if not personal + promisor dies - Section 37)

When to Perform? (Section 46-47)

• Specified time: At that time
• Specified day: During business hours (9am-6pm)
• No time specified: Within reasonable time
• Time of essence: Delay = breach

Where to Perform? (Section 49)

• Where agreed
• Where reasonable from contract nature
• Promisor's place of business (if nothing specified)

How to Perform? (Sections 37-50)

• Exact performance (unless contract allows substantial)
• Standard: As specified or as reasonable person would
• Tender of performance valid (Section 38) even if not accepted (discharges)

Reciprocal Promises (Sections 51-58)

• Mutual and independent: Performed simultaneously
• Mutual and dependent: Order of performance matters
• Section 53: If prevented by other party → Contract voidable + compensation

Output Format

## Contract Validity Analysis

### Contract Details
- **Type**: [Contract type]
- **Parties**: [Name, capacity status]
- **Subject Matter**: [Description]
- **Consideration**: Rs. [amount] / [description]
- **Date**: [DD/MM/YYYY]

### Section 10 Validity Check

| Element | Status | Analysis |
|---------|--------|----------|
| **1. Offer & Acceptance** | ✓/✗ | [Clear proposal and unconditional acceptance communicated / Issue: ...] |
| **2. Consideration** | ✓/✗ | [Present/past/future consideration identified / Issue: ...] |
| **3. Capacity** | ✓/✗ | [Both parties competent / Issue: Minor/Unsound mind/Disqualified] |
| **4. Free Consent** | ✓/✗ | [No vitiation / Issue: Coercion/Fraud/Misrepresentation/Undue Influence/Mistake] |
| **5. Lawful Object** | ✓/✗ | [Lawful / Issue: Section 23 violation - specify ground] |
| **6. Not Expressly Void** | ✓/✗ | [Compliant / Issue: Section 26-30 violation] |
| **7. Certainty** | ✓/✗ | [Terms certain / Issue: Vague/ambiguous - Section 29] |
| **8. Possibility** | ✓/✗ | [Performance possible / Issue: Impossible - Section 56] |

### Classification

**Status**: ✓ VALID / ⚠ VOIDABLE / ✗ VOID

**Grounds** (if VOIDABLE or VOID):
- [Specific statutory section + reasoning]

### Consequences

**If VALID**:
- Enforceable by both parties
- Performance required
- Breach remedies: Damages, specific performance, injunction, rescission

**If VOIDABLE**:
- Aggrieved party ([party name]) can:
  - Rescind (Section 64): Cancel + restore benefit
  - Affirm: Continue with contract
- Remedies: Rescission + damages (Section 75 if fraud/breach)

**If VOID**:
- No legal effect
- Not enforceable
- Section 65 restitution: Restore advantage received

### Performance Obligations

[If contract VALID]

**[Party 1] must**:
- [Obligation 1 - Section reference]
- [Obligation 2 - Section reference]

**[Party 2] must**:
- [Obligation 1 - Section reference]
- [Obligation 2 - Section reference]

**Timeline**: [When performance due]
**Place**: [Where performance]
**Standard**: [How to perform]

### Risks and Issues

**Legal Risks**:
1. [Risk 1 + mitigation]
2. [Risk 2 + mitigation]

**Performance Risks**:
1. [Risk 1 + mitigation]
2. [Risk 2 + mitigation]

### Recommendations

1. [Recommendation 1]
2. [Recommendation 2]
...

### Statutory Basis
- Sections: [List all applicable sections]
- Case Law: [Relevant precedents]

Integration

• Use within /contract-advice command
• Use within contract-law-specialist agent
• Combine with remedies_evaluator skill for breach scenarios

---

Version: 1.0.0 Domain: Contract Law (India)