library/skills/conductor-setup/SKILL.md
Initialize project with Conductor artifacts (product definition, tech stack, workflow, style guides)
npx skillsauth add superesty/unified-ag-kit conductor-setupInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Initialize or resume Conductor project setup. This command creates foundational project documentation through interactive Q&A.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Check if conductor/ directory already exists in the project root:
conductor/product.md exists: Ask user whether to resume setup or reinitializeconductor/setup_state.json exists with incomplete status: Offer to resume from last stepDetect project type by checking for existing indicators:
Load or create conductor/setup_state.json:
{
"status": "in_progress",
"project_type": "greenfield|brownfield",
"current_section": "product|guidelines|tech_stack|workflow|styleguides",
"current_question": 1,
"completed_sections": [],
"answers": {},
"files_created": [],
"started_at": "ISO_TIMESTAMP",
"last_updated": "ISO_TIMESTAMP"
}
CRITICAL RULES:
setup_state.json after each successful stepQ1: Project Name
What is your project name?
Suggested:
1. [Infer from directory name]
2. [Infer from package.json/go.mod if brownfield]
3. Type your own
Q2: Project Description
Describe your project in one sentence.
Suggested:
1. A web application that [does X]
2. A CLI tool for [doing Y]
3. Type your own
Q3: Problem Statement
What problem does this project solve?
Suggested:
1. Users struggle to [pain point]
2. There's no good way to [need]
3. Type your own
Q4: Target Users
Who are the primary users?
Suggested:
1. Developers building [X]
2. End users who need [Y]
3. Internal teams managing [Z]
4. Type your own
Q5: Key Goals (optional)
What are 2-3 key goals for this project? (Press enter to skip)
Q1: Voice and Tone
What voice/tone should documentation and UI text use?
Suggested:
1. Professional and technical
2. Friendly and approachable
3. Concise and direct
4. Type your own
Q2: Design Principles
What design principles guide this project?
Suggested:
1. Simplicity over features
2. Performance first
3. Developer experience focused
4. User safety and reliability
5. Type your own (comma-separated)
For brownfield projects, first analyze existing code:
Glob to find package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.Q1: Primary Language(s)
What primary language(s) does this project use?
[For brownfield: "I detected: Python 3.11, JavaScript. Is this correct?"]
Suggested:
1. TypeScript
2. Python
3. Go
4. Rust
5. Type your own (comma-separated)
Q2: Frontend Framework (if applicable)
What frontend framework (if any)?
Suggested:
1. React
2. Vue
3. Next.js
4. None / CLI only
5. Type your own
Q3: Backend Framework (if applicable)
What backend framework (if any)?
Suggested:
1. Express / Fastify
2. Django / FastAPI
3. Go standard library
4. None / Frontend only
5. Type your own
Q4: Database (if applicable)
What database (if any)?
Suggested:
1. PostgreSQL
2. MongoDB
3. SQLite
4. None / Stateless
5. Type your own
Q5: Infrastructure
Where will this be deployed?
Suggested:
1. AWS (Lambda, ECS, etc.)
2. Vercel / Netlify
3. Self-hosted / Docker
4. Not decided yet
5. Type your own
Q1: TDD Strictness
How strictly should TDD be enforced?
Suggested:
1. Strict - tests required before implementation
2. Moderate - tests encouraged, not blocked
3. Flexible - tests recommended for complex logic
Q2: Commit Strategy
What commit strategy should be followed?
Suggested:
1. Conventional Commits (feat:, fix:, etc.)
2. Descriptive messages, no format required
3. Squash commits per task
Q3: Code Review Requirements
What code review policy?
Suggested:
1. Required for all changes
2. Required for non-trivial changes
3. Optional / self-review OK
Q4: Verification Checkpoints
When should manual verification be required?
Suggested:
1. After each phase completion
2. After each task completion
3. Only at track completion
Q1: Languages to Include
Which language style guides should be generated?
[Based on detected languages, pre-select]
Options:
1. TypeScript/JavaScript
2. Python
3. Go
4. Rust
5. All detected languages
6. Skip style guides
Q2: Existing Conventions
Do you have existing linting/formatting configs to incorporate?
[For brownfield: "I found .eslintrc, .prettierrc. Should I incorporate these?"]
Suggested:
1. Yes, use existing configs
2. No, generate fresh guides
3. Skip this step
After completing Q&A, generate the following files:
# Conductor - [Project Name]
Navigation hub for project context.
## Quick Links
- [Product Definition](./product.md)
- [Product Guidelines](./product-guidelines.md)
- [Tech Stack](./tech-stack.md)
- [Workflow](./workflow.md)
- [Tracks](./tracks.md)
## Active Tracks
<!-- Auto-populated by /conductor:new-track -->
## Getting Started
Run `/conductor:new-track` to create your first feature track.
Template populated with Q&A answers for:
Template populated with:
Template populated with:
Template populated with:
# Tracks Registry
| Status | Track ID | Title | Created | Updated |
| ------ | -------- | ----- | ------- | ------- |
<!-- Tracks registered by /conductor:new-track -->
Generate selected style guides from $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/templates/code_styleguides/
After each successful file creation:
setup_state.json:
files_created arraylast_updated timestampcompleted_sectionsRead toolWhen all files are created:
Set setup_state.json status to "complete"
Display summary:
Conductor setup complete!
Created artifacts:
- conductor/index.md
- conductor/product.md
- conductor/product-guidelines.md
- conductor/tech-stack.md
- conductor/workflow.md
- conductor/tracks.md
- conductor/code_styleguides/[languages]
Next steps:
1. Review generated files and customize as needed
2. Run /conductor:new-track to create your first track
If --resume argument or resuming from state:
setup_state.jsoncurrent_section and current_questiondevelopment
Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.
development
Expert in Langfuse - the open-source LLM observability platform. Covers tracing, prompt management, evaluation, datasets, and integration with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI. Essential for debugging, monitoring, and improving LLM applications in production. Use when: langfuse, llm observability, llm tracing, prompt management, llm evaluation.
tools
Design LLM applications using the LangChain framework with agents, memory, and tool integration patterns. Use when building LangChain applications, implementing AI agents, or creating complex LLM workflows.
development
Expert Kubernetes architect specializing in cloud-native infrastructure, advanced GitOps workflows (ArgoCD/Flux), and enterprise container orchestration. Masters EKS/AKS/GKE, service mesh (Istio/Linkerd), progressive delivery, multi-tenancy, and platform engineering. Handles security, observability, cost optimization, and developer experience. Use PROACTIVELY for K8s architecture, GitOps implementation, or cloud-native platform design.