skills/internal-debrief-writer/SKILL.md
Generates an internal-only post-meeting summary that includes context a CSM would never share with the customer -- political observations, relationship assessments, competitive intelligence, strategic notes, and honest sentiment reads. Distinct from follow-up emails (customer-facing) and meeting outcome logs (CRM-facing). Use when asked to write an internal debrief, document internal observations from a meeting, create a confidential post-meeting analysis, capture relationship intelligence, or when a CSM needs to record what they actually think happened versus what they would share externally. Also triggers for questions about internal meeting analysis, confidential account observations, political dynamics documentation, or candid post-meeting notes for the team.
npx skillsauth add stephenrogan/csm-skills internal-debrief-writerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generates the internal-only version of what happened in a meeting. This is where you document what you actually observed -- political dynamics, relationship reads, competitive signals, and the gap between what the customer said and what they meant.
Distinct from:
After a significant customer meeting, provide:
One sentence: what was the most important thing that happened?
Not a summary of the agenda. The one insight that changes how you think about this account.
Example: "Tom is supportive but is not going to fight for the renewal without data he can show his CFO."
| They Said | What It Likely Means | Confidence | Implication | |-----------|---------------------|-----------|------------| | "We are happy with the product" (but did not elaborate) | Surface-level satisfaction. Not passionate enough to advocate. Not dissatisfied enough to leave | Medium | Do not mistake politeness for loyalty. Probe deeper in the next touchpoint | | "We are looking at our tool stack" | May or may not include your product. Could be routine review or competitive signal | Low-Medium | Ask directly: "Is our product part of that review?" Better to know now | | "Our priorities have shifted" | The use case you sold into may no longer be the use case they need you for | Medium | Investigate what the new priorities are. Can your product serve them? | | "Let me think about it" | They have concerns they did not voice. Or they need to consult someone not in the room | Medium | Follow up in 48 hours with a specific question, not a generic "have you had a chance to think?" |
This is not a universal decoder. It is a framework for the CSM to document their specific read on what specific statements meant in the context of this specific relationship.
Who matters and where they stand:
| Person | Observation | Change from Prior | Implication | |--------|------------|------------------|------------| | [name] | [what you observed -- energy, engagement, statements, body language] | [Better/Worse/Same/New] | [What this means for your strategy] |
Specific things to note:
Any competitive signal from the meeting, even indirect:
| Signal | Strength | Source | Recommended Action | |--------|---------|--------|-------------------| | [what you heard or observed] | [Strong/Moderate/Weak] | [Direct statement / Indirect hint / Inference] | [Investigate / Monitor / Prepare response] |
Your honest read on the account's trajectory:
What you need from your team, stated directly:
| Need | From Whom | Urgency | Context | |------|----------|---------|---------| | [specific ask] | [person or team] | [This week / This month / FYI] | [why you need it] |
## Internal Debrief: [Account Name]
**Meeting date:** [date] | **Type:** [type]
**Classification:** [Routine / Significant / Concerning / Urgent]
### Headline
[One sentence -- the most important takeaway]
### Said vs. Meant
[Completed table with your reads]
### Political Landscape
[Completed table with observations and implications]
### Competitive Intelligence
[Any signals, or "None detected"]
### Strategic Assessment
Health reality: [your read]
Renewal outlook: [your read]
Biggest risk: [one sentence]
Biggest opportunity: [one sentence]
What changed: [one sentence]
### Help Needed
[Specific asks with urgency]
### Distribution
[Who should read this -- manager only, manager + leadership, broader CS team]
Not every meeting needs a full debrief. The guideline:
| Meeting Type | Debrief? | Why | |-------------|----------|-----| | Routine check-in, no surprises | No -- meeting outcome log is sufficient | The formal record captures everything meaningful | | Meeting where something shifted (new information, change in tone, unexpected topic) | Yes | The shift is the story. The formal record does not capture nuance | | QBR or major business review | Yes | Too much happened to capture in a CRM log. The strategic read matters | | Escalation or service recovery meeting | Yes | The political dynamics and relationship impact are as important as the resolution | | First meeting with a new stakeholder | Yes | First impressions and relationship reads need to be documented while fresh | | Meeting where you detected a competitive signal | Yes | Competitive intelligence decays rapidly. Document it immediately | | Any meeting that changes your view of the account | Yes | If your assessment changed, document why. Your future self needs this context |
development
Structures the CSM's week based on their portfolio status, upcoming events, overdue items, and strategic priorities. Produces a time-blocked plan that balances reactive demands with proactive account management. Use when asked to plan a week, structure daily priorities, build a weekly schedule, allocate time across accounts, manage a busy week, or when a CSM feels overwhelmed and needs to determine where to focus. Also triggers for questions about time management, weekly planning, account prioritisation for the week, daily priority setting, or how to balance competing demands across a portfolio.
development
Constructs a compelling value narrative for a customer account by connecting product usage to business outcomes in the customer's language. Produces different versions for different audiences -- the champion, the CFO, the board. Use when asked to build a value story, articulate ROI, create a business case for the customer, prepare value evidence for a renewal or QBR, or when a CSM needs to translate usage metrics into business impact the customer will recognise. Also triggers for questions about value articulation, ROI storytelling, customer business case, value evidence, or how to prove the product is worth the investment.
data-ai
Takes raw usage data -- even a spreadsheet export or pasted metrics -- and identifies patterns, risks, and opportunities. Translates product analytics into account intelligence a CSM can act on. Use when asked to interpret usage data, analyse product metrics, make sense of a usage report, identify trends in customer behaviour, flag usage-based risks, or when a CSM has data but does not know what it means for the account. Also triggers for questions about usage analysis, product analytics interpretation, behavioural pattern detection, usage-based risk identification, or turning raw metrics into actionable insight.
development
Builds a structured 30-60-90 day plan for a CSM taking over a new book of accounts or joining a new team. Prioritises accounts by risk and value, identifies immediate relationship actions, and structures the ramp to full productivity. Use when asked to plan a book transition, create a new CSM onboarding plan, structure a territory takeover, build a 30-60-90 plan for a new role, or when a CSM is inheriting accounts and needs a systematic approach to getting up to speed. Also triggers for questions about account transitions, new book ramp-up, CSM onboarding to a portfolio, territory planning, or how to take over accounts from another CSM.