skills/ceos-delegate/SKILL.md
Use when categorizing tasks for delegation using the Delegate and Elevate 4-quadrant framework
npx skillsauth add skinnyandbald/ceos ceos-delegateInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Categorize a leader's tasks and responsibilities into the Delegate and Elevate 4-quadrant matrix based on enjoyment and competency. Identify what to keep, what to delegate, and create action plans for handing off work that doesn't belong in the leader's "Love It / Great At It" quadrant.
Not for: People evaluation (use ceos-people), organizational structure (use ceos-accountability), or performance conversations (use ceos-quarterly). Delegate and Elevate is a leadership development tool — it helps leaders focus on their highest and best use, not assess fit or performance.
Search upward from the current directory for the .ceos marker file. This file marks the root of the CEOS repository.
If .ceos is not found, stop and tell the user: "Not in a CEOS repository. Clone your CEOS repo and run setup.sh first."
Sync before use: Once you find the CEOS root, run git -C <ceos_root> pull --ff-only --quiet 2>/dev/null to get the latest data from teammates. If it fails (conflict or offline), continue silently with local data.
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| data/delegate/ | Delegate and Elevate audit files (one per person) |
| templates/delegate.md | Template for new delegation audits |
| data/accountability.md | Source of seat responsibilities (read-only — use ceos-accountability to modify) |
| data/people/ | People Analyzer evaluations (read-only — reference for context) |
Each person has a markdown file at data/delegate/firstname-lastname.md with YAML frontmatter:
person: "Brad Feld"
seat: "Visionary"
date: "2026-02-15"
status: active # active | reviewed | stale
quadrant_counts:
love_great: 5 # Love It / Great At It — keep
like_good: 3 # Like It / Good At It — delegate when possible
not_like_good: 4 # Don't Like It / Good At It — delegate soon
not_like_not_good: 2 # Don't Like It / Not Good At It — delegate immediately
delegation_progress:
delegated: 3 # Tasks successfully delegated
total: 6 # Total tasks in bottom two quadrants
percent: 50
last_reviewed: "2026-02-15"
File naming: firstname-lastname.md — lowercase, hyphenated. Person-centric (survives role changes).
| Quadrant | Enjoyment | Competency | Action | Priority | |----------|-----------|------------|--------|----------| | Love It / Great At It | High | High | Keep | — | | Like It / Good At It | Medium | High | Delegate when possible | Low | | Don't Like It / Good At It | Low | High | Delegate soon | Medium | | Don't Like It / Not Good At It | Low | Low | Delegate immediately | High |
The goal is to spend 80%+ of time in Quadrant 1. Tasks in Quadrants 3 and 4 drain energy and often become bottlenecks because the leader delays or underperforms them.
| Status | Meaning | When |
|--------|---------|------|
| active | Current audit, delegation in progress | After initial audit or re-audit |
| reviewed | Audit reviewed, delegation actions updated | After a Review or Plan session |
| stale | Audit is > 120 days old | Flagged automatically by Review mode |
Use when running a Delegate and Elevate audit for a specific person. This is typically done 1-2x per year per leadership team member.
Ask for the person's name. Check if data/delegate/firstname-lastname.md already exists.
templates/delegate.mdRead data/accountability.md to find the person's seat(s) and their 5 key responsibilities per seat.
Optionally check data/people/firstname-lastname.md for additional context (GWC assessment, current status). Don't display unless relevant — this is about tasks, not performance.
Walk the user through building a complete task list. Start with the seat responsibilities from Step 2, then expand:
"Beyond seat responsibilities, what else does [person] spend time on? Think about:
Collect tasks as a numbered list. Aim for 10-20 tasks total. If the user lists fewer than 8, prompt: "Leaders typically have 12-20 distinct responsibilities. Are there tasks you're forgetting?"
For each task, ask two questions:
Map the answers to quadrants:
| Enjoyment | Competency | Quadrant | |-----------|------------|----------| | Love it | Great at it | Q1: Love It / Great At It | | Like it | Good at it | Q2: Like It / Good At It | | Love it | Good at it | Q2: Like It / Good At It | | Like it | Great at it | Q1: Love It / Great At It | | Don't like it | Good/Great at it | Q3: Don't Like It / Good At It | | Don't like it | Not good at it | Q4: Don't Like It / Not Good At It |
Batch processing: For efficiency, present 3-5 tasks at a time rather than one by one. Display a table and let the user categorize in batches.
After all tasks are categorized, show the summary:
Delegate and Elevate — [Person Name]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Quadrant Distribution:
| Quadrant | Count | % | Action |
|----------|-------|---|--------|
| Love It / Great At It | 5 | 36% | Keep |
| Like It / Good At It | 3 | 21% | Delegate when possible |
| Don't Like It / Good At It | 4 | 29% | Delegate soon |
| Don't Like It / Not Good At It | 2 | 14% | Delegate immediately |
Total tasks: 14
Quadrant 1 focus: 36% — Target: 80%+
Tasks to delegate: 6 (43% of total)
Highlight the bottom two quadrants with urgency:
🔴 Delegate Immediately (Q4):
1. [Task] — Not good at it, doesn't enjoy it. Bottleneck risk.
2. [Task] — Energy drain and quality risk.
🟡 Delegate Soon (Q3):
1. [Task] — Competent but draining. Find someone who loves it.
2. [Task] — Good at it but resents it. Delegate before burnout.
3. [Task] — High skill, low passion. Perfect for a rising team member.
4. [Task] — Taking time from Q1 work.
Show the complete file before writing. Ask: "Save this Delegate and Elevate audit?"
Write to data/delegate/firstname-lastname.md using the template. Update:
Use when reviewing Delegate and Elevate results across the team or for a specific person.
Read all files from data/delegate/ via Glob("data/delegate/*.md"). Parse YAML frontmatter.
If no files exist: "No Delegate and Elevate audits found. Run an Audit for your first team member."
Delegate and Elevate — Team Overview
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Name | Seat | Last Audit | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Delegation % | Flag |
|------|------|------------|----|----|----|----|-------------|------|
| Brad Feld | Visionary | 2026-02-15 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 50% | |
| Sarah Chen | Integrator | 2026-01-10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | |
| Mike Torres | VP Sales | 2025-09-15 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 25% | 📅 Stale |
Team averages:
Q1 focus: 53% — Target: 80%+
Delegation completion: 58%
For each person, parse their delegate file for "Delegated?" column values:
Delegation Progress — [Person Name]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Delegated: 3 / 6 tasks (50%)
████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░ 50%
Completed delegations:
✓ [Task A] → [Person X] — Done
✓ [Task B] → [Person Y] — Done
✓ [Task C] → [Person Z] — Done
Remaining:
○ [Task D] — No owner assigned yet
○ [Task E] — Training in progress
○ [Task F] — Not started
Check last_reviewed date for each person. If > 120 days ago:
"📅 [Person]'s audit is [N] days old. Consider re-running before the next Quarterly Planning session."
If a person has multiple audit history entries (from re-audits), show the trend:
Quadrant Trend — [Person Name]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Date | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 % |
|------|----|----|----|----|------|
| 2025-08-15 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 20% |
| 2026-02-15 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 36% |
Direction: Improving (+16% Q1 focus)
Ask: "Want to view details for a specific person, or run a new Audit?"
Use when creating a concrete delegation plan for tasks in the bottom two quadrants.
Ask for the person's name. Read data/delegate/firstname-lastname.md.
If no audit exists: "No audit found for [person]. Run an Audit first to identify tasks for delegation."
Display tasks from Quadrants 3 and 4 that haven't been delegated yet:
Tasks Ready for Delegation — [Person Name]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔴 Delegate Immediately (Q4):
1. [Task A] — Not good at it, doesn't enjoy it
🟡 Delegate Soon (Q3):
2. [Task B] — Good at it but draining
3. [Task C] — Competent but would rather not
Which tasks would you like to create delegation plans for? (all / select by number)
For each selected task, ask:
Build the delegation plan in the delegate file:
Delegation Plan
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Task | Delegate To | Training Needed | Timeline | Status |
|------|-------------|----------------|----------|--------|
| [Task A] | Sarah Chen | Yes — shadow for 1 week | 2026-03-01 | Not started |
| [Task B] | Mike Torres | No — already has skills | 2026-02-28 | Not started |
| [Task C] | New hire (VP Ops) | Yes — full onboarding | 2026-Q2 | Blocked (hiring) |
Display: "Delegation actions saved to the delegate file. Once the ceos-todos skill is available, these can be promoted to tracked To-Dos with owners and due dates."
Show the complete updated file before writing. Ask: "Save this delegation plan?"
Update:
delegation_progress.total = count of Q3+Q4 tasks, last_reviewed = todayAudit: Quadrant distribution table with counts and percentages. Delegation priority flags (Q4 = immediate, Q3 = soon). Complete file shown before save.
Review: Summary table with all team members, quadrant counts, delegation progress %, and stale flags. Quadrant trends if multiple audits exist. Progress bars for delegation completion.
Plan: Delegation candidate list from Q3/Q4. Action plan table with delegate, training, timeline, and status. Complete file shown before save.
ceos-people instead.data/accountability.md — seat names, owners, and 5 key responsibilities per seatdata/people/firstname-lastname.md — GWC assessment, current statuswrong_seat, their D&E audit might reveal why — they may be great at tasks outside their current seat. If below_bar, D&E can help identify whether it's a skill gap (Q4 tasks) or an energy gap (Q3 tasks).data/todos/ once CEO-14 is implementedOnly ceos-delegate writes to data/delegate/. Other skills may reference delegation audits for leadership development context, but do not modify them.
tools
Use when reviewing or updating the company Vision/Traction Organizer
tools
Use when tracking, creating, completing, or reviewing To-Dos
tools
Use when defining metrics, logging weekly scorecard numbers, or analyzing trends
tools
Enhanced scorecard entry with auto-pull from L10 meetings and available MCP sources (CRM, calendar, email, filesystem). Walks through each metric one at a time with pre-populated suggestions for interactive confirmation.