skills/grilling/SKILL.md
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, asks to be grilled, or another skill needs the interview primitive.
npx skillsauth add shipshitdev/library grillingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Interview the user relentlessly until every branch of the design tree is resolved. This is the reusable interview primitive. Orchestrators (interview, shape) invoke it; they own grounding, artifacts, and routing.
Inputs:
Outputs:
Creates/Modifies:
External Side Effects:
Confirmation Required:
Delegates To:
Map the topic as a design tree: every decision branches into the decisions that hang off it.
The frontier is every decision whose prerequisites are already settled — the questions that can be asked now without guessing at answers not yet heard.
Work the tree in rounds. Ask the whole frontier in one round. Wait for answers before the next round.
Number each frontier question. Recommend an answer so the user can accept it in a word.
**Q1 — <question title>**: <question body, including choices when they exist>
Recommended: <recommended answer>
A question whose answer depends on another question still open in this round belongs to a later round, not this one.
Finding facts is the agent's job. When a frontier question needs a fact from the environment (filesystem, tracker, docs), dispatch a sub-agent to find it. Do not ask the user for anything that can be looked up.
Do not block the rest of the frontier on that lookup. A running exploration is an unsettled prerequisite, so only questions downstream of it wait — ask the rest of the frontier now.
Decisions are the user's. Put each to them and wait.
The frontier is empty: every branch of the design tree visited, nothing left silently assumed.
Do not act on the tree until the user confirms a shared understanding.
development
Coordinates a weekly engineering review of board accuracy, recent code changes, operational health, and scoped cleanup. Use for a recurring repository health review or a review of the last several days.
testing
Audits project board configuration and prepares explicitly requested setup, copy, or normalization changes while preserving the existing workflow and provider boundaries. Use when inspecting a board's fields, columns, scope, or configuration.
testing
Reconciles a project board with current work and delivery evidence, reports incomplete coverage and metadata gaps, and applies only approved provider-supported field changes. Use when auditing board drift, reviewing blocked work, or assessing upcoming delivery.
development
Walk through how a subsystem works. Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement or ownership questions. Explains architecture, runtime flow, and onboarding mental models. Can critique architecture. Use why for motivation.