bundles/dev-workflow/skills/execution-debugging/SKILL.md
Scoped debugging methodology for when a test or build fails during execution/stabilization. Use to diagnose the failing check without scope-creeping — read the full error, reproduce in isolation, hypothesize before changing, localize, fix the root cause not the symptom, and guard with a regression test.
npx skillsauth add shipshitdev/library execution-debuggingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
<debugging_methodology> <scope_constraint> These steps apply ONLY to diagnosing the failing check. Do not expand beyond the files touched in the original execution. Do not redesign, refactor, or improve code outside the failure path. </scope_constraint>
When a test or build fails during stabilization, follow this sequence:
READ the full error output — not just the last line. Stack traces, assertion messages, and build logs contain the diagnosis.
REPRODUCE the failure in isolation before changing anything.
HYPOTHESIZE explicitly before each change.
LOCALIZE — narrow the failure to the smallest possible scope.
FIX the root cause, not the symptom.
GUARD — write or update a test that fails without the fix and passes with it. </debugging_methodology>
development
Coordinates a weekly engineering review of board accuracy, recent code changes, operational health, and scoped cleanup. Use for a recurring repository health review or a review of the last several days.
testing
Audits project board configuration and prepares explicitly requested setup, copy, or normalization changes while preserving the existing workflow and provider boundaries. Use when inspecting a board's fields, columns, scope, or configuration.
testing
Reconciles a project board with current work and delivery evidence, reports incomplete coverage and metadata gaps, and applies only approved provider-supported field changes. Use when auditing board drift, reviewing blocked work, or assessing upcoming delivery.
development
Walk through how a subsystem works. Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement or ownership questions. Explains architecture, runtime flow, and onboarding mental models. Can critique architecture. Use why for motivation.