external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/processing-stix-taxii-feeds/SKILL.md
Processes STIX 2.1 threat intelligence bundles delivered via TAXII 2.1 servers, normalizing objects into platform-native schemas and routing them to appropriate consuming systems. Use when onboarding new TAXII collection endpoints, automating bi-directional intelligence sharing with ISACs, or building pipeline validation for malformed STIX bundles. Activates for requests involving OASIS STIX, TAXII server configuration, MISP TAXII, or Cortex XSOAR feed integrations.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills processing-stix-taxii-feedsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill when:
Do not use this skill for proprietary vendor feed formats (Recorded Future JSON, CrowdStrike IOC lists) that require vendor-specific parsers rather than STIX processing.
stix2 library (pip install stix2) and taxii2-client libraryfrom taxii2client.v21 import Server, as_pages
server = Server("https://cti.example.com/taxii/",
user="apiuser", password="apikey")
api_root = server.api_roots[0]
for collection in api_root.collections:
print(collection.id, collection.title, collection.can_read)
Select collections relevant to your threat profile. CISA AIS provides collections segmented by sector (financial, energy, healthcare).
from taxii2client.v21 import Collection
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
collection = Collection(
"https://cti.example.com/taxii/api1/collections/<id>/objects/",
user="apiuser", password="apikey")
# Fetch only objects added in the last 24 hours
added_after = datetime.now(timezone.utc) - timedelta(hours=24)
for bundle_page in as_pages(collection.get_objects,
added_after=added_after, per_request=100):
process_bundle(bundle_page)
import stix2
def process_bundle(bundle_dict):
bundle = stix2.parse(bundle_dict, allow_custom=True)
for obj in bundle.objects:
if obj.type == "indicator":
validate_indicator(obj)
elif obj.type == "threat-actor":
upsert_threat_actor(obj)
elif obj.type == "relationship":
link_objects(obj)
def validate_indicator(indicator):
required = ["id", "type", "spec_version", "created",
"modified", "pattern", "pattern_type", "valid_from"]
for field in required:
if not hasattr(indicator, field):
raise ValueError(f"Missing required field: {field}")
# Check confidence range
if hasattr(indicator, "confidence"):
assert 0 <= indicator.confidence <= 100
Map STIX object types to destination systems:
indicator objects → SIEM lookup tables and firewall blocklistsmalware objects → EDR threat intelligence librarythreat-actor / campaign objects → TIP for analyst contextcourse-of-action objects → Security team wiki or SOAR playbook triggersUse TLP marking definitions to enforce sharing restrictions:
for marking in obj.get("object_marking_refs", []):
if "tlp-red" in marking:
route_to_restricted_platform_only(obj)
# Add validated local intelligence back to shared collection
new_indicator = stix2.Indicator(
name="Malicious C2 Domain",
pattern="[domain-name:value = 'evil-c2.example.com']",
pattern_type="stix",
valid_from="2025-01-15T00:00:00Z",
confidence=80,
labels=["malicious-activity"],
object_marking_refs=["marking-definition--34098fce-860f-479c-ae..."] # TLP:GREEN
)
collection.add_objects(stix2.Bundle(new_indicator))
| Term | Definition |
|------|-----------|
| STIX Bundle | Top-level STIX container object (type: "bundle") holding any number of STIX Domain Objects (SDOs) and STIX Relationship Objects (SROs) |
| SDO | STIX Domain Object — core intelligence types: indicator, threat-actor, malware, campaign, attack-pattern, course-of-action |
| SRO | STIX Relationship Object — links two SDOs with a labeled relationship (e.g., "uses", "attributed-to", "indicates") |
| Pattern Language | STIX pattern syntax for indicator conditions: [network-traffic:dst_port = 443 AND ipv4-addr:value = '10.0.0.1'] |
| Marking Definition | STIX object encoding TLP or statement restrictions on intelligence sharing |
| added_after | TAXII 2.1 filter parameter (RFC 3339 timestamp) for incremental polling of new objects |
spec_version field: STIX 2.0 and 2.1 have incompatible schemas (2.1 adds confidence, object_marking_refs at bundle level). Always check spec_version before parsing.next link header) causes silent data loss.added_after: Server and client time misalignment causes missed objects at interval boundaries. Use UTC exclusively and add 5-minute overlap windows.tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.