external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-privacy-impact-assessment/SKILL.md
Automates the Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) workflow including data flow mapping, privacy risk scoring matrices, GDPR Article 35 DPIA and CCPA/CPRA alignment checks, data inventory cataloging, and remediation tracking. Implements the NIST Privacy Framework PRAM methodology and ICO DPIA guidance for systematic identification and mitigation of privacy risks across processing activities. Use when conducting privacy assessments for new systems, evaluating regulatory compliance posture, or building automated privacy governance programs.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-privacy-impact-assessmentInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Build a complete inventory of personal data processing activities. Each record of processing activity (ROPA) entry must capture the data categories, legal basis, retention periods, and data subjects involved.
from agent import PrivacyImpactAssessmentEngine
engine = PrivacyImpactAssessmentEngine()
# Register a processing activity for assessment
activity = engine.register_processing_activity(
name="Customer Analytics Platform",
description="Collects browsing behavior and purchase history for personalization",
data_controller="Acme Corp",
data_processor="CloudAnalytics Inc",
data_categories=["browsing_history", "purchase_records", "ip_address", "device_id"],
data_subjects=["customers", "website_visitors"],
legal_basis="consent",
retention_period_days=730,
cross_border_transfer=True,
transfer_destinations=["US", "IN"],
automated_decision_making=True,
)
print(f"Registered activity: {activity['activity_id']}")
Map all data flows from collection to deletion, identifying every touchpoint, transformation, and storage location. This reveals hidden privacy risks in data movement across systems.
# Build the data flow map
flow_map = engine.map_data_flows(
activity_id=activity["activity_id"],
flows=[
{
"stage": "collection",
"source": "Web browser cookie + form submission",
"destination": "CDN edge server",
"data_elements": ["ip_address", "device_id", "browsing_history"],
"encryption_in_transit": True,
"protocol": "TLS 1.3",
},
{
"stage": "processing",
"source": "CDN edge server",
"destination": "Analytics data warehouse (US-East)",
"data_elements": ["browsing_history", "purchase_records", "device_id"],
"encryption_in_transit": True,
"encryption_at_rest": True,
"protocol": "mTLS",
},
{
"stage": "storage",
"source": "Analytics data warehouse",
"destination": "S3 encrypted bucket",
"data_elements": ["browsing_history", "purchase_records"],
"encryption_at_rest": True,
"retention_days": 730,
"access_controls": "IAM role-based, MFA required",
},
{
"stage": "sharing",
"source": "Analytics data warehouse",
"destination": "Third-party ML provider (IN)",
"data_elements": ["browsing_history", "purchase_records"],
"encryption_in_transit": True,
"data_processing_agreement": True,
"cross_border": True,
},
{
"stage": "deletion",
"source": "S3 bucket + data warehouse",
"destination": "Secure erasure",
"method": "Cryptographic erasure + lifecycle policy",
"verification": "Automated deletion audit log",
},
],
)
engine.render_data_flow_diagram(flow_map)
Apply a structured risk scoring methodology evaluating likelihood and impact across multiple privacy risk dimensions. The matrix aligns with both the NIST PRAM and ICO DPIA risk assessment approaches.
# Run the risk assessment
risk_report = engine.assess_privacy_risks(
activity_id=activity["activity_id"],
assessment_type="full_dpia",
)
# Display risk matrix results
for risk in risk_report["risks"]:
print(f"[{risk['severity']}] {risk['category']}: {risk['description']}")
print(f" Likelihood: {risk['likelihood']}/5 | Impact: {risk['impact']}/5 | Score: {risk['risk_score']}/25")
print(f" Mitigation: {risk['recommended_mitigation']}")
Risk categories evaluated include:
Run automated compliance checks against specific regulatory requirements. The engine maps each processing activity against article-level GDPR obligations and CCPA/CPRA consumer rights requirements.
# GDPR compliance check
gdpr_report = engine.check_gdpr_compliance(activity_id=activity["activity_id"])
print(f"GDPR Score: {gdpr_report['compliance_score']}/100")
for finding in gdpr_report["findings"]:
print(f" [{finding['status']}] Art.{finding['article']}: {finding['description']}")
# CCPA/CPRA compliance check
ccpa_report = engine.check_ccpa_compliance(activity_id=activity["activity_id"])
print(f"CCPA Score: {ccpa_report['compliance_score']}/100")
for finding in ccpa_report["findings"]:
print(f" [{finding['status']}] Sec.{finding['section']}: {finding['description']}")
Generate a prioritized remediation plan with specific action items, responsible parties, deadlines, and generate the formal PIA/DPIA report document.
# Generate remediation plan
remediation = engine.generate_remediation_plan(
activity_id=activity["activity_id"],
risk_report=risk_report,
gdpr_report=gdpr_report,
ccpa_report=ccpa_report,
)
for item in remediation["action_items"]:
print(f"[{item['priority']}] {item['action']}")
print(f" Owner: {item['owner']} | Deadline: {item['deadline']}")
print(f" Addresses: {', '.join(item['addresses_risks'])}")
# Generate formal DPIA report
engine.generate_dpia_report(
activity_id=activity["activity_id"],
output_path="dpia_report_customer_analytics.json",
format="json",
)
print("[+] DPIA report generated")
Determine whether a full DPIA is required using the ICO screening checklist:
engine = PrivacyImpactAssessmentEngine()
screening = engine.run_screening_checklist(
uses_special_category_data=False,
large_scale_processing=True,
systematic_monitoring=True,
automated_decision_making=True,
cross_border_transfer=True,
vulnerable_data_subjects=False,
innovative_technology=True,
denial_of_service_or_rights=False,
)
print(f"DPIA Required: {screening['dpia_required']}")
print(f"Triggers: {screening['triggers']}")
# Output: DPIA Required: True
# Triggers: ['large_scale_processing', 'systematic_monitoring',
# 'automated_decision_making', 'cross_border_transfer',
# 'innovative_technology']
engine = PrivacyImpactAssessmentEngine()
activities = [
{"name": "Email Marketing", "data_categories": ["email", "name"],
"legal_basis": "consent", "cross_border_transfer": False},
{"name": "HR Analytics", "data_categories": ["employee_id", "performance_scores",
"health_data"], "legal_basis": "legitimate_interest", "cross_border_transfer": True},
{"name": "Fraud Detection", "data_categories": ["transaction_data", "ip_address",
"device_fingerprint"], "legal_basis": "legitimate_interest",
"automated_decision_making": True, "cross_border_transfer": False},
]
for act_def in activities:
activity = engine.register_processing_activity(**act_def)
risk = engine.assess_privacy_risks(activity_id=activity["activity_id"])
print(f"{act_def['name']}: Overall Risk={risk['overall_risk_level']} "
f"({risk['risk_count_by_severity']})")
engine = PrivacyImpactAssessmentEngine()
profile = engine.generate_nist_privacy_profile(
activity_id=activity["activity_id"],
target_tier="tier_3", # Repeatable
)
for function_id, outcomes in profile["functions"].items():
print(f"\n{function_id}:")
for outcome in outcomes:
status = "PASS" if outcome["implemented"] else "GAP"
print(f" [{status}] {outcome['subcategory']}: {outcome['description']}")
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.