external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalog/SKILL.md
Fetch and parse the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, enrich it with EPSS scores and CVSS metrics, and build a multi-factor prioritization engine and report that ranks CVE remediation by real-world exploitation evidence and BOD 22-01 deadlines. Use when triaging a vulnerability backlog, deciding patch order across many CVEs, or building an automated KEV+EPSS prioritization workflow.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalogInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, established through Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, is a living list of CVEs that have been actively exploited in the wild and carry significant risk. As of early 2026, the catalog contains over 1,484 entries, growing 20% in 2025 alone with 245 new additions. This skill covers integrating the KEV catalog into vulnerability prioritization workflows alongside EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) and CVSS to create a risk-based approach that prioritizes vulnerabilities with confirmed exploitation activity over theoretical severity alone.
Each KEV entry contains:
| CVE Publication Date | Remediation Deadline | |----------------------|---------------------| | 2021 or later | 2 weeks from KEV listing | | Before 2021 | 6 months from KEV listing |
| Factor | Weight | Data Source | Rationale | |--------|--------|-------------|-----------| | CISA KEV Listed | 30% | CISA KEV JSON feed | Confirmed active exploitation | | EPSS Score | 25% | FIRST EPSS API | Predicted exploitation probability | | CVSS Base Score | 20% | NVD API v2.0 | Intrinsic vulnerability severity | | Asset Criticality | 15% | CMDB/Asset inventory | Business impact context | | Network Exposure | 10% | Network architecture | Attack surface accessibility |
| KEV Listed | EPSS > 0.5 | CVSS >= 9.0 | Priority | SLA | |------------|-----------|-------------|----------|-----| | Yes | Any | Any | P1-Emergency | 48 hours | | No | Yes | Yes | P1-Emergency | 48 hours | | No | Yes | No | P2-Critical | 7 days | | No | No | Yes | P2-Critical | 7 days | | No | No | No (>= 7.0) | P3-High | 14 days | | No | No | No (>= 4.0) | P4-Medium | 30 days | | No | No | No (< 4.0) | P5-Low | 90 days |
import requests
import json
from datetime import datetime
KEV_URL = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
def fetch_kev_catalog():
"""Download and parse the CISA KEV catalog."""
response = requests.get(KEV_URL, timeout=30)
response.raise_for_status()
data = response.json()
catalog = {}
for vuln in data.get("vulnerabilities", []):
cve_id = vuln["cveID"]
catalog[cve_id] = {
"vendor": vuln.get("vendorProject", ""),
"product": vuln.get("product", ""),
"name": vuln.get("vulnerabilityName", ""),
"date_added": vuln.get("dateAdded", ""),
"description": vuln.get("shortDescription", ""),
"action": vuln.get("requiredAction", ""),
"due_date": vuln.get("dueDate", ""),
"ransomware_use": vuln.get("knownRansomwareCampaignUse", "Unknown"),
}
print(f"[+] Loaded {len(catalog)} CVEs from CISA KEV catalog")
print(f" Catalog version: {data.get('catalogVersion', 'N/A')}")
print(f" Last updated: {data.get('dateReleased', 'N/A')}")
return catalog
kev = fetch_kev_catalog()
EPSS_API = "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss"
def get_epss_scores(cve_list):
"""Fetch EPSS scores for a batch of CVEs."""
scores = {}
batch_size = 100
for i in range(0, len(cve_list), batch_size):
batch = cve_list[i:i + batch_size]
cve_param = ",".join(batch)
response = requests.get(EPSS_API, params={"cve": cve_param}, timeout=30)
if response.status_code == 200:
for entry in response.json().get("data", []):
scores[entry["cve"]] = {
"epss": float(entry.get("epss", 0)),
"percentile": float(entry.get("percentile", 0)),
}
return scores
import pandas as pd
def prioritize_vulnerabilities(scan_results, kev_catalog, epss_scores):
"""Apply multi-factor prioritization to scan results."""
prioritized = []
for vuln in scan_results:
cve_id = vuln.get("cve_id", "")
cvss_score = float(vuln.get("cvss_score", 0))
asset_criticality = float(vuln.get("asset_criticality", 3))
exposure = float(vuln.get("network_exposure", 3))
in_kev = cve_id in kev_catalog
kev_data = kev_catalog.get(cve_id, {})
epss_data = epss_scores.get(cve_id, {"epss": 0, "percentile": 0})
epss_score = epss_data["epss"]
# Composite risk score calculation
risk_score = (
(1.0 if in_kev else 0.0) * 10 * 0.30 +
epss_score * 10 * 0.25 +
cvss_score * 0.20 +
(asset_criticality / 5.0) * 10 * 0.15 +
(exposure / 5.0) * 10 * 0.10
)
# Assign priority level
if in_kev or (epss_score > 0.5 and cvss_score >= 9.0):
priority = "P1-Emergency"
sla_days = 2
elif epss_score > 0.5 or cvss_score >= 9.0:
priority = "P2-Critical"
sla_days = 7
elif cvss_score >= 7.0:
priority = "P3-High"
sla_days = 14
elif cvss_score >= 4.0:
priority = "P4-Medium"
sla_days = 30
else:
priority = "P5-Low"
sla_days = 90
prioritized.append({
"cve_id": cve_id,
"cvss_score": cvss_score,
"epss_score": round(epss_score, 4),
"epss_percentile": round(epss_data["percentile"], 4),
"in_cisa_kev": in_kev,
"ransomware_use": kev_data.get("ransomware_use", "N/A"),
"kev_due_date": kev_data.get("due_date", "N/A"),
"risk_score": round(risk_score, 2),
"priority": priority,
"sla_days": sla_days,
"asset": vuln.get("asset", ""),
"asset_criticality": asset_criticality,
})
df = pd.DataFrame(prioritized)
df = df.sort_values("risk_score", ascending=False)
return df
def generate_report(df, output_file="kev_prioritized_report.csv"):
"""Generate summary report from prioritized vulnerabilities."""
print("\n" + "=" * 70)
print("VULNERABILITY PRIORITIZATION REPORT - KEV + EPSS + CVSS")
print("=" * 70)
print(f"\nTotal vulnerabilities analyzed: {len(df)}")
print(f"KEV-listed vulnerabilities: {df['in_cisa_kev'].sum()}")
print(f"Ransomware-associated: {(df['ransomware_use'] == 'Known').sum()}")
print("\nPriority Distribution:")
print(df["priority"].value_counts().to_string())
print("\nTop 15 Highest Risk Vulnerabilities:")
top = df.head(15)[["cve_id", "cvss_score", "epss_score", "in_cisa_kev",
"risk_score", "priority"]]
print(top.to_string(index=False))
df.to_csv(output_file, index=False)
print(f"\n[+] Full report saved to: {output_file}")
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.