external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem/SKILL.md
Perform systematic alert triage in Elastic Security SIEM—classifying, prioritizing, and investigating alerts using Kibana, ES|QL queries, and ECS-normalized data—to drive SOC analyst workflows. Use when triaging incoming Elastic Security detections, prioritizing an analyst's alert queue, or investigating alerts during SOC operations.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siemInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Alert triage in Elastic Security is the systematic process of reviewing, classifying, and prioritizing security alerts to determine which represent genuine threats. Elastic's AI-driven Attack Discovery feature can triage hundreds of alerts down to discrete attack chains, but skilled analyst triage remains essential. A structured triage workflow typically takes 5-10 minutes per alert cluster using Elastic's built-in tools.
When viewing an alert in Elastic Security, review the alert details panel:
Alert Details Panel:
- Rule Name and Description
- Severity and Risk Score
- MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
- Host and User Context
- Process Tree (for endpoint alerts)
- Timeline of related events
| Field | Purpose | ECS Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rule severity | Initial priority assessment | kibana.alert.severity |
| Risk score | Quantified threat level | kibana.alert.risk_score |
| Host name | Affected system | host.name |
| User name | Affected identity | user.name |
| Process name | Executing process | process.name |
| Source IP | Origin of activity | source.ip |
| Destination IP | Target of activity | destination.ip |
| MITRE tactic | Attack stage | threat.tactic.name |
FROM logs-endpoint.events.*
| WHERE host.name == "affected-host" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 1 HOUR
| STATS count = COUNT(*) BY event.category, event.action
| SORT count DESC
FROM logs-*
| WHERE user.name == "suspicious-user" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 24 HOURS
| STATS count = COUNT(*), unique_hosts = COUNT_DISTINCT(host.name) BY event.category
| SORT count DESC
FROM .alerts-security.alerts-default
| WHERE source.ip == "10.0.0.50" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 24 HOURS
| STATS alert_count = COUNT(*) BY kibana.alert.rule.name, kibana.alert.severity
| SORT alert_count DESC
FROM logs-system.auth-*
| WHERE source.ip == "10.0.0.50" AND event.outcome == "success"
| STATS login_count = COUNT(*), hosts = COUNT_DISTINCT(host.name) BY user.name
| WHERE hosts > 3
Check indicators against threat intelligence:
FROM logs-ti_*
| WHERE threat.indicator.ip == "203.0.113.50"
| KEEP threat.indicator.type, threat.indicator.provider, threat.indicator.confidence, threat.feed.name
FROM logs-endpoint.events.file-*
| WHERE file.hash.sha256 == "abc123..."
| STATS occurrences = COUNT(*) BY host.name, file.path, user.name
| Classification | Criteria | Action | |---|---|---| | True Positive | Confirmed malicious activity | Escalate to incident, begin containment | | Benign True Positive | Expected behavior matching rule | Document in alert notes, acknowledge | | False Positive | Rule triggered on benign activity | Mark as false positive, create tuning task | | Needs Investigation | Insufficient data for determination | Assign for deeper investigation |
For each triaged alert, document:
Elastic Security includes 1000+ pre-built detection rules organized by:
{
"name": "Multiple Failed Logins Followed by Success",
"type": "threshold",
"query": "event.category:authentication AND event.outcome:failure",
"threshold": {
"field": ["source.ip", "user.name"],
"value": 5,
"cardinality": [
{
"field": "user.name",
"value": 3
}
]
},
"severity": "high",
"risk_score": 73,
"threat": [
{
"framework": "MITRE ATT&CK",
"tactic": {
"id": "TA0006",
"name": "Credential Access"
},
"technique": [
{
"id": "T1110",
"name": "Brute Force"
}
]
}
]
}
Elastic's Attack Discovery automatically:
| Risk Score | Severity | Asset Criticality | Response SLA | |---|---|---|---| | 90-100 | Critical | High | 15 minutes | | 70-89 | High | High | 30 minutes | | 70-89 | High | Medium | 1 hour | | 50-69 | Medium | Any | 4 hours | | 21-49 | Low | Any | 8 hours | | 1-20 | Informational | Any | 24 hours |
| Metric | Target | Measurement | |---|---|---| | Mean Time to Triage (MTTT) | < 10 minutes | Time from alert creation to classification | | False Positive Rate | < 30% | False positives / total alerts | | Escalation Rate | 10-20% | Escalated alerts / total alerts | | Alert Coverage | > 80% | Triaged alerts / generated alerts per shift | | Reclassification Rate | < 5% | Changed classifications / total classified |
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.