external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem/SKILL.md
Perform systematic alert triage in Elastic Security SIEM to rapidly classify, prioritize, and investigate security alerts for SOC operations.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siemInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Alert triage in Elastic Security is the systematic process of reviewing, classifying, and prioritizing security alerts to determine which represent genuine threats. Elastic's AI-driven Attack Discovery feature can triage hundreds of alerts down to discrete attack chains, but skilled analyst triage remains essential. A structured triage workflow typically takes 5-10 minutes per alert cluster using Elastic's built-in tools.
When viewing an alert in Elastic Security, review the alert details panel:
Alert Details Panel:
- Rule Name and Description
- Severity and Risk Score
- MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
- Host and User Context
- Process Tree (for endpoint alerts)
- Timeline of related events
| Field | Purpose | ECS Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rule severity | Initial priority assessment | kibana.alert.severity |
| Risk score | Quantified threat level | kibana.alert.risk_score |
| Host name | Affected system | host.name |
| User name | Affected identity | user.name |
| Process name | Executing process | process.name |
| Source IP | Origin of activity | source.ip |
| Destination IP | Target of activity | destination.ip |
| MITRE tactic | Attack stage | threat.tactic.name |
FROM logs-endpoint.events.*
| WHERE host.name == "affected-host" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 1 HOUR
| STATS count = COUNT(*) BY event.category, event.action
| SORT count DESC
FROM logs-*
| WHERE user.name == "suspicious-user" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 24 HOURS
| STATS count = COUNT(*), unique_hosts = COUNT_DISTINCT(host.name) BY event.category
| SORT count DESC
FROM .alerts-security.alerts-default
| WHERE source.ip == "10.0.0.50" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 24 HOURS
| STATS alert_count = COUNT(*) BY kibana.alert.rule.name, kibana.alert.severity
| SORT alert_count DESC
FROM logs-system.auth-*
| WHERE source.ip == "10.0.0.50" AND event.outcome == "success"
| STATS login_count = COUNT(*), hosts = COUNT_DISTINCT(host.name) BY user.name
| WHERE hosts > 3
Check indicators against threat intelligence:
FROM logs-ti_*
| WHERE threat.indicator.ip == "203.0.113.50"
| KEEP threat.indicator.type, threat.indicator.provider, threat.indicator.confidence, threat.feed.name
FROM logs-endpoint.events.file-*
| WHERE file.hash.sha256 == "abc123..."
| STATS occurrences = COUNT(*) BY host.name, file.path, user.name
| Classification | Criteria | Action | |---|---|---| | True Positive | Confirmed malicious activity | Escalate to incident, begin containment | | Benign True Positive | Expected behavior matching rule | Document in alert notes, acknowledge | | False Positive | Rule triggered on benign activity | Mark as false positive, create tuning task | | Needs Investigation | Insufficient data for determination | Assign for deeper investigation |
For each triaged alert, document:
Elastic Security includes 1000+ pre-built detection rules organized by:
{
"name": "Multiple Failed Logins Followed by Success",
"type": "threshold",
"query": "event.category:authentication AND event.outcome:failure",
"threshold": {
"field": ["source.ip", "user.name"],
"value": 5,
"cardinality": [
{
"field": "user.name",
"value": 3
}
]
},
"severity": "high",
"risk_score": 73,
"threat": [
{
"framework": "MITRE ATT&CK",
"tactic": {
"id": "TA0006",
"name": "Credential Access"
},
"technique": [
{
"id": "T1110",
"name": "Brute Force"
}
]
}
]
}
Elastic's Attack Discovery automatically:
| Risk Score | Severity | Asset Criticality | Response SLA | |---|---|---|---| | 90-100 | Critical | High | 15 minutes | | 70-89 | High | High | 30 minutes | | 70-89 | High | Medium | 1 hour | | 50-69 | Medium | Any | 4 hours | | 21-49 | Low | Any | 8 hours | | 1-20 | Informational | Any | 24 hours |
| Metric | Target | Measurement | |---|---|---| | Mean Time to Triage (MTTT) | < 10 minutes | Time from alert creation to classification | | False Positive Rate | < 30% | False positives / total alerts | | Escalation Rate | 10-20% | Escalated alerts / total alerts | | Alert Coverage | > 80% | Triaged alerts / generated alerts per shift | | Reclassification Rate | < 5% | Changed classifications / total classified |
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.