external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation/SKILL.md
Investigate Active Directory compromise by analyzing authentication logs, replication metadata, Group Policy changes, and Kerberos ticket anomalies to identify attacker persistence and lateral movement paths.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills performing-active-directory-compromise-investigationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Active Directory (AD) compromise investigation is a critical incident response capability that focuses on identifying how attackers gained access to domain services, what persistence mechanisms they established, and the scope of credential compromise. Since 88% of breaches involve compromised credentials (Verizon 2025 DBIR), AD is the primary target for enterprise-wide attacks. Investigators must analyze NTDS.dit database integrity, Kerberos ticket-granting activity, Group Policy modifications, replication metadata, and privileged group membership changes to reconstruct the attack chain and determine full compromise scope.
The NTDS.dit file is the core Active Directory credential database containing all password hashes for domain accounts. Attackers commonly exfiltrate this file using tools like ntdsutil, secretsdump.py, or DCSync attacks via Mimikatz.
Detection indicators:
Golden Ticket indicators:
Silver Ticket indicators:
Kerberoasting indicators:
Track modifications to these critical groups:
1. Identify potentially compromised domain controllers
2. Collect Security, System, Directory Service event logs
3. Extract AD replication metadata using repadmin
4. Capture ntdsutil snapshots for offline analysis
5. Collect DNS server logs and zone transfer records
6. Export Group Policy Object configurations
7. Document current privileged group memberships
1. Parse Event ID 4624/4625 for logon patterns
2. Identify pass-the-hash indicators (Event ID 4624 Type 3 with NTLM)
3. Analyze Event ID 4768/4769/4771 for Kerberos anomalies
4. Review Event ID 4776 for NTLM authentication failures
5. Cross-reference logon events with known compromised accounts
6. Map lateral movement paths through authentication chains
1. Enumerate AdminSDHolder ACL modifications
2. Check for SID History abuse on accounts
3. Verify krbtgt account password age
4. Audit DSRM password configuration
5. Check for skeleton key malware indicators
6. Review AD Certificate Services for rogue certificates
7. Validate DNS records for poisoning
1. Double-rotate krbtgt password (wait replication between rotations)
2. Reset all compromised account passwords
3. Remove unauthorized privileged group members
4. Revoke rogue certificates if AD CS compromised
5. Rebuild domain controllers from clean media if needed
6. Implement tiered administration model
7. Enable Protected Users group for privileged accounts
| Event ID | Source | Description | |----------|--------|-------------| | 4624 | Security | Successful logon | | 4625 | Security | Failed logon | | 4648 | Security | Explicit credential logon | | 4662 | Security | Operation on AD object | | 4768 | Security | Kerberos TGT requested | | 4769 | Security | Kerberos service ticket requested | | 4771 | Security | Kerberos pre-authentication failed | | 4776 | Security | NTLM credential validation | | 5136 | Security | Directory object modified | | 5137 | Security | Directory object created | | 4706 | Security | Trust created | | 4707 | Security | Trust removed | | 4742 | Security | Computer account changed | | 8222 | System | Shadow copy created |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | BloodHound | Attack path mapping and privilege escalation analysis | | Pingcastle | AD security assessment and risk scoring | | Purple Knight | AD vulnerability scanning by Semperis | | ADRecon | Active Directory data gathering | | Mimikatz | Credential extraction and Kerberos analysis | | Impacket | DCSync detection and NTLM relay analysis | | Velociraptor | Remote forensic artifact collection | | Timeline Explorer | Event log timeline analysis |
| Technique | ID | Relevance | |-----------|----|-----------| | DCSync | T1003.006 | NTDS.dit credential extraction | | Golden Ticket | T1558.001 | Kerberos TGT forgery | | Silver Ticket | T1558.002 | Service ticket forgery | | Kerberoasting | T1558.003 | Service account hash extraction | | Pass-the-Hash | T1550.002 | NTLM hash reuse | | Group Policy Modification | T1484.001 | Persistence via GPO | | Account Manipulation | T1098 | Privileged group changes | | SID-History Injection | T1134.005 | Privilege escalation |
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.