external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md
Build and run a third-party / vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP 800-161 C-SCRM and NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC: inventory and tier vendors by risk, send the right due-diligence questionnaire (SIG, CAIQ), review evidence (SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test reports), set contractual security and right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors continuously, manage Nth-party / subcontractor risk, and offboard securely. Use when an organization needs to assess a new vendor before onboarding, when standing up or maturing a vendor-risk program, when tiering a vendor portfolio, when reviewing a SOC 2 or CAIQ, when writing security requirements into a contract or DPA, when a vendor suffers a breach, or when managing supply-chain / software supply-chain risk. Keywords: third-party risk, vendor risk management, TPRM, supply chain risk, C-SCRM, NIST 800-161, vendor tiering, SIG questionnaire, CAIQ, SOC 2, ISO 27001, right to audit, continuous monitoring, security ratings, fourth-party risk, Nth-party, vendor offboarding, due diligence.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills managing-third-party-vendor-riskInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Catalog every third party and capture: data sensitivity handled, type of access (network, physical, none), business criticality, and regulatory scope. You cannot manage what you have not inventoried — shadow vendors are a common blind spot.
Score each vendor on inherent-risk factors (data sensitivity, access, criticality, regulatory scope, spend/concentration) and assign a tier (e.g., Critical / High / Moderate / Low). The tier drives how deep the assessment goes and how often you reassess. A payroll processor with PII and system access is not the same risk as a stock-photo subscription.
Don't just collect — read:
Compare findings against your control requirements. For each gap: accept, require remediation (with a date), add a compensating control on your side, or walk away. Record the residual risk and a risk-owner decision.
Bake requirements into the agreement: security control obligations, breach-notification timeline, data-handling and return/destruction terms, right-to-audit / right to assessment evidence, subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown, and liability/insurance. Contracts are where TPRM gets teeth.
Tiering is not a one-time gate. For higher tiers: periodic reassessment, security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate-expiry tracking, and watching for material changes (acquisition, region change, new subprocessors). Re-tier on change.
Map critical fourth parties (your vendor's key subprocessors) and watch for concentration (many vendors riding on the same upstream provider) — a single upstream outage or breach can hit your whole portfolio at once.
On termination: revoke access and credentials, confirm data return or certified destruction, remove integrations/API keys, and update the inventory. Un-offboarded vendors are standing risk.
| Concept | Definition | |---|---| | Inherent risk | Risk a vendor poses before controls — drives tiering. | | Residual risk | Risk remaining after the vendor's (and your) controls. | | Vendor tier | Risk band (Critical/High/Moderate/Low) setting assessment depth and cadence. | | SIG | Shared Assessments Standardized Information Gathering questionnaire (full / Lite / Core). | | CAIQ | CSA Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (maps to the Cloud Controls Matrix). | | SOC 2 Type II | Attestation on control design and operating effectiveness over a period. | | Right to audit | Contractual right to assess the vendor or obtain assessment evidence. | | Nth-party / fourth-party | Your vendor's vendors (and beyond) — indirect supply-chain risk. | | Concentration risk | Many vendors depending on the same upstream provider. | | C-SCRM | Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (NIST SP 800-161). |
Produce a Vendor Risk Assessment using assets/template.md, containing:
Use scripts/process.py to compute a vendor's inherent-risk tier from a profile JSON, set the assessment depth and reassessment cadence, and flag missing evidence for the assigned tier.
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.