external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-zero-standing-privilege-with-cyberark/SKILL.md
Deploy CyberArk Secure Cloud Access to eliminate standing privileges in hybrid and multi-cloud environments using just-in-time access with time, entitlement, and approval controls.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-zero-standing-privilege-with-cyberarkInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Zero Standing Privileges (ZSP) is a security model where no user or identity retains persistent privileged access. Instead, elevated access is provisioned dynamically on a just-in-time (JIT) basis and automatically revoked after use. CyberArk implements ZSP through its Secure Cloud Access (SCA) module, which creates ephemeral, scoped roles in cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP) that exist only for the duration of a session. The TEA framework -- Time, Entitlements, and Approvals -- governs every privileged access session.
| Component | Description | Configuration | |-----------|-------------|---------------| | Time | Duration of the privileged session | Min 15 minutes, max 8 hours, default 1 hour | | Entitlements | Permissions granted during the session | Dynamically scoped IAM roles/policies | | Approvals | Authorization workflow before access | Auto-approve, manager approval, or multi-level |
User requests access via CyberArk
│
├── CyberArk evaluates request against policies:
│ ├── Is user eligible for this access?
│ ├── Does the request comply with TEA policies?
│ └── Is approval required?
│
├── [If approval needed] → Route to approver (ITSM/ChatOps)
│
├── Upon approval:
│ ├── CyberArk creates ephemeral IAM role in target cloud
│ ├── Scopes permissions to minimum required entitlements
│ ├── Sets session TTL (time-bound)
│ └── Provisions temporary credentials
│
├── User accesses cloud resources via session
│ ├── All actions logged and recorded
│ └── Session monitored for policy violations
│
└── Session expires:
├── Ephemeral role deleted
├── Temporary credentials revoked
└── Zero standing privileges remain
| Component | Role | |-----------|------| | Identity Security Platform | Central management and policy engine | | Privilege Cloud Vault | Stores privileged credentials and keys | | Secure Cloud Access | Creates/destroys ephemeral cloud roles | | Endpoint Privilege Manager | Controls local admin and app elevation | | Privileged Session Manager | Records and monitors privileged sessions |
AWS Integration:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::CYBERARK_ACCOUNT:role/CyberArkSCARole"
},
"Action": "sts:AssumeRole",
"Condition": {
"StringEquals": {
"sts:ExternalId": "cyberark-external-id"
}
}
}]
}
Azure Integration:
GCP Integration:
Create policies that map job functions to cloud entitlements:
# CyberArk SCA Policy Example
policy_name: "developer-aws-read-access"
description: "Read-only access to AWS production for developers"
target_cloud: "aws"
target_accounts: ["123456789012", "987654321098"]
time_policy:
max_duration: "4h"
default_duration: "1h"
business_hours_only: true
timezone: "America/New_York"
entitlement_policy:
aws_managed_policies:
- "arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/ReadOnlyAccess"
deny_actions:
- "iam:*"
- "organizations:*"
- "sts:*"
resource_restrictions:
- "arn:aws:s3:::production-*"
approval_policy:
approval_required: true
approvers:
- type: "manager"
- type: "group"
group: "cloud-security-team"
auto_approve_conditions:
- previous_approved_same_policy: true
within_days: 7
escalation_timeout: "2h"
escalation_approver: "cloud-security-lead"
Set up privileged session recording and real-time monitoring:
Integrate with ITSM tools for access request and approval:
Phase 1: DISCOVERY (Weeks 1-2)
├── Inventory all standing privileged roles across cloud accounts
├── Map users to their standing role assignments
├── Analyze CloudTrail/activity logs for actual permission usage
└── Identify roles that can be converted to JIT
Phase 2: POLICY CREATION (Weeks 3-4)
├── Create ZSP policies based on actual usage analysis
├── Define TEA parameters for each policy
├── Configure approval workflows
└── Test policies with pilot users
Phase 3: MIGRATION (Weeks 5-8)
├── Assign ZSP policies to pilot group
├── Remove standing privileges from pilot users
├── Monitor for access issues and adjust policies
├── Expand to additional teams incrementally
└── Remove all standing privileges organization-wide
Phase 4: GOVERNANCE (Ongoing)
├── Monthly review of ZSP policy effectiveness
├── Quarterly entitlement optimization
├── Monitor for policy drift or standing privilege re-creation
└── Report ZSP metrics to security leadership
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.