external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-vulnerability-sla-breach-alerting/SKILL.md
Build an automated SLA breach alerting system for vulnerability remediation, including a database schema for SLA tracking, breach detection logic, notification dispatch, a scheduled check runner, and a KPI/compliance metrics dashboard. Use when implementing severity-based SLA timelines (critical/high/medium/low), detecting and escalating SLA breaches, or building vulnerability remediation compliance reporting.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-vulnerability-sla-breach-alertingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Vulnerability remediation SLAs define maximum timeframes for addressing security findings based on severity. This skill covers building an automated alerting system that tracks remediation timelines, detects SLA breaches, sends escalation notifications, and generates compliance reports. Industry-standard SLA targets are: Critical (24-48 hours), High (15-30 days), Medium (60 days), Low (90 days).
requests, pandas, jinja2, smtplib libraries| Severity | Remediation SLA | Grace Period | Escalation Level | |----------|----------------|--------------|-----------------| | Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0) | 48 hours | 12 hours | VP Engineering + CISO | | High (CVSS 7.0-8.9) | 15 days | 5 days | Director of Engineering | | Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9) | 60 days | 14 days | Team Lead | | Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9) | 90 days | 30 days | Asset Owner |
# sla_policy.yaml
sla_tiers:
critical:
cvss_min: 9.0
cvss_max: 10.0
remediation_days: 2
grace_period_days: 0.5
escalation_contacts:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
pagerduty_severity: critical
high:
cvss_min: 7.0
cvss_max: 8.9
remediation_days: 15
grace_period_days: 5
escalation_contacts:
- [email protected]
pagerduty_severity: high
medium:
cvss_min: 4.0
cvss_max: 6.9
remediation_days: 60
grace_period_days: 14
escalation_contacts:
- [email protected]
pagerduty_severity: warning
low:
cvss_min: 0.1
cvss_max: 3.9
remediation_days: 90
grace_period_days: 30
escalation_contacts:
- [email protected]
pagerduty_severity: info
notification_channels:
slack:
webhook_url: "${SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL}"
channel: "#vulnerability-alerts"
email:
smtp_host: smtp.company.com
smtp_port: 587
from_address: [email protected]
pagerduty:
api_key: "${PAGERDUTY_API_KEY}"
service_id: "${PAGERDUTY_SERVICE_ID}"
alert_schedules:
approaching_breach:
percentage_elapsed: 80
frequency_hours: 24
at_breach:
notification: immediate
escalation: true
post_breach:
frequency_hours: 12
escalation_increase: true
CREATE TABLE vulnerability_sla (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
cve_id VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
finding_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
asset_hostname VARCHAR(255),
severity VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
cvss_score DECIMAL(3,1),
discovered_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
sla_deadline TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
remediated_at TIMESTAMP,
status VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT 'open',
owner_email VARCHAR(255),
escalation_level INTEGER DEFAULT 0,
last_alert_sent TIMESTAMP,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE INDEX idx_sla_status ON vulnerability_sla(status);
CREATE INDEX idx_sla_deadline ON vulnerability_sla(sla_deadline);
CREATE INDEX idx_sla_severity ON vulnerability_sla(severity);
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
import yaml
def load_sla_policy(policy_path="sla_policy.yaml"):
with open(policy_path, "r") as f:
return yaml.safe_load(f)
def get_sla_tier(cvss_score, policy):
for tier_name, tier in policy["sla_tiers"].items():
if tier["cvss_min"] <= cvss_score <= tier["cvss_max"]:
return tier_name, tier
return "low", policy["sla_tiers"]["low"]
def calculate_sla_deadline(discovered_at, cvss_score, policy):
tier_name, tier = get_sla_tier(cvss_score, policy)
deadline = discovered_at + timedelta(days=tier["remediation_days"])
return deadline, tier_name
def check_sla_status(discovered_at, sla_deadline, remediated_at=None):
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
if remediated_at:
if remediated_at <= sla_deadline:
return "remediated_within_sla"
return "remediated_breach"
if now > sla_deadline:
overdue_days = (now - sla_deadline).days
return f"breached_{overdue_days}d_overdue"
remaining = sla_deadline - now
total_sla = sla_deadline - discovered_at
pct_elapsed = ((total_sla - remaining) / total_sla) * 100
if pct_elapsed >= 80:
return "approaching_breach"
return "within_sla"
import requests
import json
import smtplib
from email.mime.text import MIMEText
from email.mime.multipart import MIMEMultipart
def send_slack_alert(webhook_url, vuln_data, sla_status):
color = {"breached": "#FF0000", "approaching_breach": "#FFA500", "within_sla": "#36A64F"}
status_color = color.get("breached" if "breached" in sla_status else sla_status, "#808080")
payload = {
"attachments": [{
"color": status_color,
"title": f"Vulnerability SLA Alert: {vuln_data['cve_id']}",
"fields": [
{"title": "Severity", "value": vuln_data["severity"], "short": True},
{"title": "CVSS", "value": str(vuln_data["cvss_score"]), "short": True},
{"title": "Asset", "value": vuln_data["asset_hostname"], "short": True},
{"title": "SLA Status", "value": sla_status, "short": True},
{"title": "Deadline", "value": vuln_data["sla_deadline"].strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M UTC"), "short": True},
{"title": "Owner", "value": vuln_data.get("owner_email", "Unassigned"), "short": True},
],
}]
}
requests.post(webhook_url, json=payload, timeout=10)
def send_pagerduty_alert(api_key, service_id, vuln_data, severity):
payload = {
"routing_key": api_key,
"event_action": "trigger",
"payload": {
"summary": f"SLA Breach: {vuln_data['cve_id']} on {vuln_data['asset_hostname']}",
"severity": severity,
"source": vuln_data["asset_hostname"],
"custom_details": {
"cve_id": vuln_data["cve_id"],
"cvss_score": vuln_data["cvss_score"],
"sla_deadline": vuln_data["sla_deadline"].isoformat(),
}
}
}
requests.post(
"https://events.pagerduty.com/v2/enqueue",
json=payload, timeout=10
)
def send_email_alert(smtp_config, to_addresses, vuln_data, sla_status):
msg = MIMEMultipart("alternative")
msg["Subject"] = f"[SLA {sla_status.upper()}] {vuln_data['cve_id']} - {vuln_data['severity']}"
msg["From"] = smtp_config["from_address"]
msg["To"] = ", ".join(to_addresses)
body = f"""
Vulnerability SLA Alert
CVE: {vuln_data['cve_id']}
Severity: {vuln_data['severity']} (CVSS {vuln_data['cvss_score']})
Asset: {vuln_data['asset_hostname']}
SLA Deadline: {vuln_data['sla_deadline'].strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M UTC')}
Status: {sla_status}
Owner: {vuln_data.get('owner_email', 'Unassigned')}
Please take immediate action to remediate this vulnerability.
"""
msg.attach(MIMEText(body, "plain"))
with smtplib.SMTP(smtp_config["smtp_host"], smtp_config["smtp_port"]) as server:
server.starttls()
server.send_message(msg)
# Run SLA breach check every hour via cron
echo "0 * * * * cd /opt/vuln-sla && python3 scripts/process.py --check-sla" | crontab -
# Manual check
python3 scripts/process.py --check-sla --policy sla_policy.yaml
# Generate SLA compliance report
python3 scripts/process.py --report --period monthly --output sla_report.html
def calculate_sla_metrics(db_connection, period_start, period_end):
metrics = {
"total_findings": 0,
"remediated_within_sla": 0,
"sla_breach_count": 0,
"mean_time_to_remediate": {},
"sla_compliance_rate": 0.0,
"current_overdue": 0,
}
# Query findings in period grouped by severity
query = """
SELECT severity, COUNT(*) as total,
SUM(CASE WHEN remediated_at <= sla_deadline THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as within_sla,
AVG(EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM (COALESCE(remediated_at, NOW()) - discovered_at))/86400) as avg_days
FROM vulnerability_sla
WHERE discovered_at BETWEEN %s AND %s
GROUP BY severity
"""
return metrics
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.