external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents/SKILL.md
Implements an integrated incident ticketing system connecting SIEM alerts to ServiceNow, Jira, or TheHive for structured incident tracking, SLA management, escalation workflows, and compliance documentation. Use when SOC teams need formalized incident lifecycle management with automated ticket creation, assignment routing, and resolution tracking.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidentsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill when:
Do not use for individual alert triage — ticketing is for confirmed incidents requiring multi-step investigation and remediation, not every SIEM alert.
Establish standardized incident categories and severity:
incident_taxonomy:
categories:
- malware_infection
- phishing_campaign
- unauthorized_access
- data_exfiltration
- denial_of_service
- ransomware
- insider_threat
- vulnerability_exploitation
- account_compromise
- policy_violation
severity_levels:
critical:
definition: "Active data breach, ransomware, or business-critical system compromise"
response_sla: 15 minutes
resolution_sla: 4 hours
escalation: immediate to Tier 3 + CISO notification
examples: ["Active ransomware", "Domain admin compromise", "Customer data breach"]
high:
definition: "Confirmed compromise of business systems or multiple user accounts"
response_sla: 30 minutes
resolution_sla: 8 hours
escalation: Tier 2 immediate, Tier 3 if unresolved in 2 hours
examples: ["Malware with C2", "Lateral movement detected", "Phishing with credential theft"]
medium:
definition: "Confirmed security event requiring investigation and remediation"
response_sla: 2 hours
resolution_sla: 24 hours
escalation: Tier 2 within 4 hours
examples: ["Single phishing click", "Unauthorized software", "Policy violation"]
low:
definition: "Minor security event with limited impact"
response_sla: 8 hours
resolution_sla: 72 hours
escalation: Tier 1 standard queue
examples: ["Scan attempt", "Failed brute force (no compromise)", "Info disclosure"]
ServiceNow Integration via REST API:
import requests
import json
from datetime import datetime
class IncidentTicketManager:
def __init__(self, snow_url, snow_user, snow_password):
self.snow_url = snow_url
self.auth = (snow_user, snow_password)
self.headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Accept": "application/json"
}
def create_incident(self, alert_data):
"""Create ServiceNow incident from SIEM alert"""
severity_map = {
"critical": "1",
"high": "2",
"medium": "3",
"low": "4"
}
payload = {
"short_description": f"[SEC] {alert_data['rule_name']} — {alert_data['src']}",
"description": self._build_description(alert_data),
"category": "Security",
"subcategory": alert_data.get("category", "Investigation"),
"urgency": severity_map.get(alert_data["severity"], "3"),
"impact": severity_map.get(alert_data["severity"], "3"),
"assignment_group": self._get_assignment_group(alert_data["severity"]),
"caller_id": "soc_automation",
"u_siem_event_id": alert_data.get("notable_id", ""),
"u_mitre_technique": alert_data.get("mitre_technique", ""),
"u_affected_hosts": ", ".join(alert_data.get("affected_hosts", [])),
"u_iocs": json.dumps(alert_data.get("iocs", {}))
}
response = requests.post(
f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident",
auth=self.auth,
headers=self.headers,
json=payload
)
result = response.json()["result"]
return {
"ticket_number": result["number"],
"sys_id": result["sys_id"],
"state": result["state"]
}
def _build_description(self, alert_data):
return f"""
SECURITY INCIDENT — Auto-generated from SIEM
================================================
Alert Rule: {alert_data['rule_name']}
SIEM Event ID: {alert_data.get('notable_id', 'N/A')}
Detection Time: {alert_data['detection_time']}
Severity: {alert_data['severity'].upper()}
MITRE ATT&CK: {alert_data.get('mitre_technique', 'N/A')}
Source: {alert_data.get('src', 'N/A')}
Destination: {alert_data.get('dest', 'N/A')}
User: {alert_data.get('user', 'N/A')}
Initial Context:
{alert_data.get('description', 'See SIEM for details.')}
IOCs:
{json.dumps(alert_data.get('iocs', {}), indent=2)}
"""
def _get_assignment_group(self, severity):
if severity in ("critical", "high"):
return "SOC Tier 2"
return "SOC Tier 1"
def update_incident(self, ticket_number, updates):
"""Update an existing incident"""
# First get sys_id from ticket number
response = requests.get(
f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident",
auth=self.auth,
headers=self.headers,
params={"sysparm_query": f"number={ticket_number}", "sysparm_limit": 1}
)
sys_id = response.json()["result"][0]["sys_id"]
# Update
response = requests.patch(
f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident/{sys_id}",
auth=self.auth,
headers=self.headers,
json=updates
)
return response.json()["result"]
def add_work_note(self, ticket_number, note):
"""Add investigation note to incident"""
self.update_incident(ticket_number, {"work_notes": note})
def escalate_incident(self, ticket_number, reason):
"""Escalate to next tier"""
self.update_incident(ticket_number, {
"assignment_group": "SOC Tier 3",
"urgency": "1",
"work_notes": f"ESCALATED: {reason}"
})
def resolve_incident(self, ticket_number, resolution):
"""Resolve and close incident"""
self.update_incident(ticket_number, {
"state": "6", # Resolved
"close_code": "Resolved",
"close_notes": resolution,
"u_incident_disposition": resolution.split(":")[0] if ":" in resolution else "Resolved"
})
TheHive Case Creation (alternative to ServiceNow):
import requests
class TheHiveCaseManager:
def __init__(self, thehive_url, api_key):
self.url = thehive_url
self.headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_key}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
def create_case(self, alert_data):
"""Create case in TheHive from SIEM alert"""
case = {
"title": f"[{alert_data['severity'].upper()}] {alert_data['rule_name']}",
"description": self._build_markdown_description(alert_data),
"severity": {"critical": 4, "high": 3, "medium": 2, "low": 1}.get(
alert_data["severity"], 2
),
"tlp": 2, # TLP:AMBER
"pap": 2, # PAP:AMBER
"tags": [
alert_data.get("mitre_technique", ""),
alert_data.get("category", ""),
f"source:{alert_data.get('src', 'unknown')}"
],
"tasks": self._generate_tasks(alert_data["severity"]),
"customFields": {
"siem-event-id": {"string": alert_data.get("notable_id", "")},
"mitre-technique": {"string": alert_data.get("mitre_technique", "")},
"detection-source": {"string": "Splunk ES"}
}
}
response = requests.post(
f"{self.url}/api/case",
headers=self.headers,
json=case
)
return response.json()
def _generate_tasks(self, severity):
"""Generate investigation tasks based on severity"""
tasks = [
{"title": "Initial Triage", "group": "Phase 1", "description": "Review SIEM alert and validate findings"},
{"title": "IOC Enrichment", "group": "Phase 1", "description": "Enrich all IOCs with VT, AbuseIPDB"},
{"title": "Scope Assessment", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "Determine affected systems and users"},
]
if severity in ("critical", "high"):
tasks.extend([
{"title": "Containment Actions", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "Isolate affected systems"},
{"title": "Evidence Collection", "group": "Phase 3", "description": "Preserve forensic artifacts"},
{"title": "Eradication", "group": "Phase 3", "description": "Remove threat from environment"},
{"title": "Recovery", "group": "Phase 4", "description": "Restore systems to normal operations"},
{"title": "Post-Incident Review", "group": "Phase 4", "description": "Document lessons learned"},
])
else:
tasks.append(
{"title": "Resolution and Documentation", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "Document findings and close"}
)
return tasks
def add_observable(self, case_id, ioc_type, ioc_value, description=""):
"""Add IOC observable to case"""
observable = {
"dataType": ioc_type,
"data": ioc_value,
"message": description,
"tlp": 2,
"ioc": True,
"tags": ["auto-extracted"]
}
response = requests.post(
f"{self.url}/api/case/{case_id}/artifact",
headers=self.headers,
json=observable
)
return response.json()
Splunk SLA Monitoring Dashboard:
--- Active incidents approaching SLA breach
index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" state IN ("New", "In Progress")
| eval sla_minutes = case(
urgency="1", 15,
urgency="2", 30,
urgency="3", 120,
urgency="4", 480
)
| eval age_minutes = round((now() - strptime(opened_at, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")) / 60, 0)
| eval sla_remaining = sla_minutes - age_minutes
| eval sla_status = case(
sla_remaining < 0, "BREACHED",
sla_remaining < sla_minutes * 0.25, "AT RISK",
1=1, "ON TRACK"
)
| where sla_status IN ("BREACHED", "AT RISK")
| sort sla_remaining
| table number, short_description, urgency, assignment_group, assigned_to,
age_minutes, sla_minutes, sla_remaining, sla_status
Auto-Escalation Logic:
def check_sla_breaches(ticket_manager):
"""Check for SLA breaches and auto-escalate"""
open_incidents = ticket_manager.get_open_incidents()
for incident in open_incidents:
age_minutes = (datetime.utcnow() - incident["opened_at"]).total_seconds() / 60
sla_minutes = {"1": 15, "2": 30, "3": 120, "4": 480}[incident["urgency"]]
if age_minutes > sla_minutes and incident["state"] == "New":
ticket_manager.escalate_incident(
incident["number"],
f"SLA BREACH: {int(age_minutes)}min elapsed, {sla_minutes}min SLA. Auto-escalating."
)
--- Monthly incident metrics
index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security"
opened_at > "2024-03-01" opened_at < "2024-04-01"
| stats count AS total,
avg(eval((resolved_at - opened_at) / 3600)) AS avg_resolution_hours,
sum(eval(if(urgency="1", 1, 0))) AS critical,
sum(eval(if(urgency="2", 1, 0))) AS high,
sum(eval(if(urgency="3", 1, 0))) AS medium,
sum(eval(if(urgency="4", 1, 0))) AS low
| eval avg_resolution = round(avg_resolution_hours, 1)
--- SLA compliance rate
index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" state="Resolved"
| eval sla_target = case(urgency="1", 4, urgency="2", 8, urgency="3", 24, urgency="4", 72)
| eval resolution_hours = (resolved_at - opened_at) / 3600
| eval sla_met = if(resolution_hours <= sla_target, 1, 0)
| stats sum(sla_met) AS met, count AS total
| eval compliance_pct = round(met / total * 100, 1)
| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | Incident Ticket | Formal tracking record for a confirmed security incident with lifecycle management | | SLA | Service Level Agreement defining maximum response and resolution times by severity | | Escalation Path | Defined routing from Tier 1 to Tier 2/3 based on severity, time elapsed, or analyst request | | Disposition | Final classification of a closed incident (true positive, false positive, duplicate, policy violation) | | MTTR | Mean Time to Resolve — average time from ticket creation to resolution across all incidents | | Case Management | Structured approach to managing complex incidents with tasks, observables, and audit trails |
INCIDENT TICKET — INC0012567
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Title: [SEC] Cobalt Strike C2 Beacon Detected — WORKSTATION-042
Category: Security > Malware Infection
Severity: Critical (P1)
SLA: Response: 15 min | Resolution: 4 hours
Timeline:
14:23 Ticket created (auto from Splunk ES NE-2024-08921)
14:25 Assigned to analyst_jdoe (Tier 2)
14:28 Work note: "VT confirms Cobalt Strike beacon, hash a1b2c3..."
14:35 Work note: "Host isolated via CrowdStrike, C2 domain blocked"
15:00 Work note: "Enterprise IOC scan — 2 additional hosts found"
15:30 Escalated to Tier 3 for forensic analysis
16:00 Work note: "All affected hosts contained and cleaned"
18:00 Resolved: "Malware eradicated, systems restored, monitoring for 72h"
Metrics:
Time to Acknowledge: 2 minutes
Time to Contain: 12 minutes
Time to Resolve: 3 hours 37 minutes
SLA Status: MET (within 4-hour resolution target)
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.