external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent/SKILL.md
Implements policy-as-code enforcement with Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Gatekeeper for Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines, covering writing Rego policies, deploying OPA Gatekeeper as a Kubernetes admission controller, testing policies in development, and integrating policy evaluation into deployment pipelines. Use when writing Rego policies, deploying Gatekeeper admission control, or gating CI/CD pipelines with policy-as-code checks.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agentInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Do not use for vulnerability scanning (use Trivy/Checkov), for runtime threat detection (use Falco), or for network policy enforcement (use Kubernetes NetworkPolicy or Calico).
# Install Gatekeeper via Helm
helm repo add gatekeeper https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/charts
helm install gatekeeper gatekeeper/gatekeeper \
--namespace gatekeeper-system --create-namespace \
--set replicas=3 \
--set audit.replicas=1 \
--set audit.writeToRAMDisk=true
# templates/k8s-required-labels.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8srequiredlabels
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
labels:
type: array
items:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8srequiredlabels
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
provided := {label | input.review.object.metadata.labels[label]}
required := {label | label := input.parameters.labels[_]}
missing := required - provided
count(missing) > 0
msg := sprintf("Missing required labels: %v", [missing])
}
---
# templates/k8s-container-limits.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8scontainerlimits
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sContainerLimits
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
cpu:
type: string
memory:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8scontainerlimits
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.cpu
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no CPU limit", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.memory
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no memory limit", [container.name])
}
---
# templates/k8s-block-privileged.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sblockprivileged
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sblockprivileged
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.initContainers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged init container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
# constraints/require-labels.yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
metadata:
name: require-team-labels
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Namespace"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Deployment", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
- gatekeeper-system
parameters:
labels:
- "team"
- "environment"
- "cost-center"
---
# constraints/block-privileged.yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
metadata:
name: block-privileged-containers
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Pod"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Deployment", "DaemonSet", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
# Install conftest
brew install conftest
# Test Kubernetes manifests against OPA policies locally
conftest test deployment.yaml --policy policies/ --output json
# Test Terraform against OPA policies
conftest test terraform/main.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
# Test Dockerfiles
conftest test Dockerfile --policy policies/docker/
# policies/kubernetes/deny_latest_tag.rego
package kubernetes
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Deployment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
endswith(container.image, ":latest")
msg := sprintf("Container %v uses :latest tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Deployment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
not contains(container.image, ":")
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
# .github/workflows/policy-test.yml
name: Policy Validation
on:
pull_request:
paths: ['k8s/**', 'terraform/**', 'policies/**']
jobs:
conftest:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install conftest
run: |
wget -q https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/download/v0.50.0/conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
tar xzf conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
sudo mv conftest /usr/local/bin/
- name: Test K8s manifests
run: conftest test k8s/**/*.yaml --policy policies/kubernetes/ --output json
- name: Test Terraform
run: conftest test terraform/*.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | OPA | Open Policy Agent — general-purpose policy engine using Rego language for policy decisions | | Rego | OPA's declarative query language for writing policy rules | | Gatekeeper | Kubernetes-native OPA integration implementing admission control via ConstraintTemplates | | ConstraintTemplate | CRD defining the Rego policy logic and parameters schema for a class of constraints | | Constraint | Instance of a ConstraintTemplate with specific parameters and scope (which resources to check) | | Admission Controller | Kubernetes component that intercepts API requests before persistence and can allow or deny them | | conftest | CLI tool for testing structured data (YAML, JSON, HCL) against OPA policies |
Context: Multiple development teams deploy to shared Kubernetes clusters. Some teams run privileged containers and images without resource limits, causing security and stability issues.
Approach:
enforcementAction: warn to identify violations without blocking deploymentsenforcementAction: deny after the remediation periodexcludedNamespaces for kube-system and monitoring namespacesPitfalls: Deploying Gatekeeper with deny mode immediately can break existing workloads. Always start with warn mode. Overly restrictive policies without exemptions for system namespaces can prevent cluster components from functioning.
OPA Policy Evaluation Report
==============================
Cluster: production-east
Date: 2026-02-23
Gatekeeper Version: 3.16.0
CONSTRAINT SUMMARY:
K8sRequiredLabels: 12 violations (warn)
K8sBlockPrivileged: 0 violations (deny)
K8sContainerLimits: 8 violations (deny)
K8sBlockLatestTag: 3 violations (deny)
BLOCKED DEPLOYMENTS (deny):
[K8sContainerLimits] deployment/api-server in ns/payments
- Container 'api' has no memory limit
[K8sBlockLatestTag] deployment/frontend in ns/web
- Container 'nginx' uses :latest tag
AUDIT VIOLATIONS (warn):
[K8sRequiredLabels] namespace/staging
- Missing labels: {cost-center}
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.