external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/implementing-api-security-testing-with-42crunch/SKILL.md
Implement comprehensive API security testing using the 42Crunch platform to perform static audit and dynamic conformance scanning of OpenAPI specifications.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills implementing-api-security-testing-with-42crunchInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
42Crunch is an API security platform that combines Shift-Left security testing with Shield-Right runtime protection. It provides API Audit for static security analysis of OpenAPI definitions, API Conformance Scan for dynamic vulnerability detection, and API Protect for real-time threat prevention. The platform integrates into CI/CD pipelines and IDEs to identify OWASP API Security Top 10 vulnerabilities before and after deployment.
API Audit performs static security analysis of OpenAPI definitions without requiring a running API. It evaluates the specification against 300+ security checks organized into categories:
Security Score Categories:
Running API Audit via VS Code Extension:
Example OpenAPI Definition with Security Controls:
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
title: Secure User API
version: 1.0.0
servers:
- url: https://api.example.com/v1
description: Production server (HTTPS only)
security:
- BearerAuth: []
paths:
/users/{userId}:
get:
operationId: getUserById
summary: Retrieve user by ID
parameters:
- name: userId
in: path
required: true
schema:
type: string
format: uuid
pattern: '^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}$'
maxLength: 36
responses:
'200':
description: User details
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/User'
'400':
description: Invalid request
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
'401':
description: Unauthorized
'404':
description: User not found
components:
securitySchemes:
BearerAuth:
type: http
scheme: bearer
bearerFormat: JWT
schemas:
User:
type: object
required:
- id
- email
properties:
id:
type: string
format: uuid
readOnly: true
email:
type: string
format: email
maxLength: 254
name:
type: string
maxLength: 100
pattern: '^[a-zA-Z\s\-]+$'
additionalProperties: false
Error:
type: object
required:
- code
- message
properties:
code:
type: integer
format: int32
message:
type: string
maxLength: 256
additionalProperties: false
The conformance scan dynamically tests a running API against its OpenAPI contract to detect runtime vulnerabilities including OWASP API Security Top 10 issues:
Scan v2 Configuration:
# 42c-conf.yaml
version: "2.0"
scan:
target:
url: https://api.example.com/v1
authentication:
- type: bearer
token: "${API_TOKEN}"
in: header
name: Authorization
settings:
maxScanTime: 3600
requestsPerSecond: 10
followRedirects: false
tests:
owasp:
- bola
- bfla
- injection
- ssrf
- massAssignment
- excessiveDataExposure
Running Conformance Scan via CLI:
# Install the 42Crunch CLI
npm install -g @42crunch/cicd-cli
# Run conformance scan
42crunch-cli scan \
--api-definition ./openapi.yaml \
--target-url https://api.example.com/v1 \
--token $CRUNCH_TOKEN \
--min-score 70 \
--report-format sarif \
--output scan-report.sarif
GitHub Actions Integration:
name: API Security Testing
on:
push:
paths:
- 'api/**'
- 'openapi/**'
jobs:
api-security:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: 42Crunch API Audit
uses: 42Crunch/api-security-audit-action@v3
with:
api-token: ${{ secrets.CRUNCH_API_TOKEN }}
collection-name: "my-api-collection"
min-score: 75
upload-to-code-scanning: true
- name: 42Crunch Conformance Scan
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
uses: 42Crunch/api-conformance-scan@v1
with:
api-token: ${{ secrets.CRUNCH_API_TOKEN }}
target-url: ${{ secrets.STAGING_API_URL }}
scan-config: ./42c-conf.yaml
Jenkins Pipeline Integration:
pipeline {
agent any
stages {
stage('API Security Audit') {
steps {
script {
def auditResult = sh(
script: '''
42crunch-cli audit \
--api-definition openapi.yaml \
--token ${CRUNCH_TOKEN} \
--min-score 75 \
--report-format json \
--output audit-report.json
''',
returnStatus: true
)
if (auditResult != 0) {
error("API Security Audit failed - score below threshold")
}
}
}
}
stage('Conformance Scan') {
when { branch 'main' }
steps {
sh '''
42crunch-cli scan \
--api-definition openapi.yaml \
--target-url ${STAGING_URL} \
--token ${CRUNCH_TOKEN} \
--scan-config 42c-conf.yaml
'''
}
}
}
post {
always {
archiveArtifacts artifacts: '*-report.*'
publishHTML([
reportDir: '.',
reportFiles: 'audit-report.html',
reportName: 'API Security Report'
])
}
}
}
API Protect deploys as a micro-gateway in front of API endpoints to enforce the OpenAPI contract at runtime:
# api-protect-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: api-protect-config
data:
protection-config.json: |
{
"apiDefinition": "/config/openapi.yaml",
"enforcement": {
"validateRequests": true,
"validateResponses": true,
"blockOnFailure": true,
"logLevel": "warn"
},
"rateLimit": {
"enabled": true,
"requestsPerMinute": 100,
"burstSize": 20
},
"allowlist": {
"contentTypes": ["application/json"],
"methods": ["GET", "POST", "PUT", "DELETE"]
}
}
When 42Crunch identifies issues, follow this remediation process:
Common Audit Findings and Fixes:
| Finding | Severity | Fix | |---------|----------|-----| | No authentication defined | Critical | Add securitySchemes and security requirements | | Missing input validation | High | Add type, format, pattern, maxLength constraints | | Server URL uses HTTP | High | Change server URLs to HTTPS | | No error responses defined | Medium | Add 4xx and 5xx response definitions | | additionalProperties not restricted | Medium | Set additionalProperties: false on object schemas | | Missing rate limiting | Medium | Add x-rateLimit extension or use API Protect |
42Crunch evaluates APIs against these critical security areas:
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.