external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/hunting-for-persistence-mechanisms-in-windows/SKILL.md
Systematically hunt for adversary persistence mechanisms across Windows endpoints including registry, services, startup folders, and WMI subscriptions.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills hunting-for-persistence-mechanisms-in-windowsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | T1547.001 | Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder | | T1543.003 | Windows Service (Create or Modify) | | T1053.005 | Scheduled Task | | T1546.003 | WMI Event Subscription | | T1546.015 | Component Object Model (COM) Hijacking | | T1546.012 | Image File Execution Options Injection | | T1546.010 | AppInit DLLs | | T1547.004 | Winlogon Helper DLL | | T1547.005 | Security Support Provider | | T1574.001 | DLL Search Order Hijacking | | TA0003 | Persistence Tactic | | Autoruns | Sysinternals tool showing persistent entries |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | Sysinternals Autoruns | Comprehensive persistence enumeration | | Velociraptor | Endpoint-wide persistence artifact collection | | CrowdStrike Falcon | Real-time persistence monitoring | | Sysmon | Registry and WMI event monitoring | | OSQuery | SQL-based persistence queries | | RECmd | Registry Explorer for forensic analysis | | Splunk | SIEM correlation of persistence events |
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run entry pointing to payload in %APPDATA%.sc create pointing to a backdoor binary.Hunt ID: TH-PERSIST-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Persistence Type: [Registry/Service/Task/WMI/COM/Other]
MITRE Technique: T1547.xxx / T1543.xxx / T1053.xxx
Location: [Full registry key / service name / task path]
Value: [Binary path / command line]
Host(s): [Affected endpoints]
Signed: [Yes/No]
Hash: [SHA256]
Creation Time: [Timestamp]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Verdict: [Malicious/Suspicious/Benign]
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.