external/cc-skills-golang/golang-testing/SKILL.md
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark`.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills golang-testingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for test strategy design and failure analysis. Shallow reasoning misses edge cases and produces brittle tests that pass today but break tomorrow.
Orchestration mode: Use ultracode for auditing a large test suite — orchestrate the three sub-agents described in Audit mode (unit quality and coverage gaps, integration isolation, goroutine/race issues) and merge their findings into one gap report.
Modes:
gotests to scaffold table-driven tests, then enrich with edge cases and error paths.t.Parallel(), implementation-detail coupling). Launch up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) unit test quality and coverage gaps, (2) integration test isolation and build tags, (3) goroutine leaks and race conditions.Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testingskill takes precedence.
Dependencies:
go install github.com/cweill/gotests/gotests@latestThis skill guides the creation of production-ready tests for Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, fast, and reliable tests.
name field passed to t.Run//go:build integration) to separate from unit testst.Parallel() when possiblegoleak.VerifyTestMain in TestMain to detect goroutine leaks// package_test.go - tests in same package (white-box, access unexported)
package mypackage
// mypackage_test.go - tests in test package (black-box, public API only)
package mypackage_test
Name the test file after the source file it tests, not after the function or method under test. Go's convention is one test file per source file (foo.go -> foo_test.go), because tools (go test, coverage reports, IDE "jump to test" navigation, gotests) and reviewers all resolve tests by source file, not by symbol. A source file usually declares several functions/methods; splitting its tests by symbol name scatters them across many files and breaks that file-to-file mapping.
// ✓ Good — one test file per source file
helloworld.go -> helloworld_test.go // contains TestHelloWorld, TestAbcd, TestXyz, ...
// ✗ Bad — test file named after the function/method instead of the source file
helloworld.go -> abcd_test.go // wrong: should be helloworld_test.go
Exception: very large source files MAY be split into multiple _test.go files by concern (e.g. foo_test.go + foo_edgecases_test.go), but each split file's name MUST still be derived from the source file name, never from an individual function name. Prefer keeping a single _test.go file per source file even when it grows large — splitting adds navigation overhead and is rarely worth it; reach for the exception only when a single file becomes genuinely unwieldy to browse or review.
Within a test file, order test functions to match the order their tested functions/methods appear in the source file. A reader (human or agent) scrolling foo.go alongside foo_test.go can then find the matching test by position instead of searching; drift between the two orderings compounds every time either file grows.
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) { ... } // function test
func TestMyStruct_MyMethod(t *testing.T) { ... } // method test
func BenchmarkAdd(b *testing.B) { ... } // benchmark
func ExampleAdd() { ... } // example
func FuzzAdd(f *testing.F) { ... } // fuzz test
Table-driven tests are the idiomatic Go way to test multiple scenarios. Always name each test case.
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
quantity int
unitPrice float64
expected float64
}{
{
name: "single item",
quantity: 1,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 10.0,
},
{
name: "bulk discount - 100 items",
quantity: 100,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 900.0, // 10% discount
},
{
name: "zero quantity",
quantity: 0,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 0.0,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)
if got != tt.expected {
t.Errorf("CalculatePrice(%d, %.2f) = %.2f, want %.2f",
tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice, got, tt.expected)
}
})
}
}
Never create a testify assert/require instance in the parent test function and reuse it inside t.Run closures. assert.New(t) captures the exact *testing.T it was built with, so if that t belongs to the parent, every failure raised inside the subtest gets attributed to the parent test in go test output — the failing subtest itself still reports --- PASS, silently hiding which case broke. This happens whether or not the subtest calls t.Parallel().
// WRONG -- `is` is bound to the parent's t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)) // misattributed on failure
})
}
}
// RIGHT -- each subtest builds its own instance from its own t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice))
})
}
}
Verify with a deliberately-broken case: if go test -v -run TestName shows --- FAIL: TestName but every --- PASS: TestName/subtest_name line still says PASS, the assert scope is leaking.
Unit tests should be fast (< 1ms), isolated (no external dependencies), and deterministic.
Use httptest for handler tests with table-driven patterns. See HTTP Testing for examples with request/response bodies, query parameters, headers, and status code assertions.
Use go.uber.org/goleak to detect leaking goroutines, especially for concurrent code:
import (
"testing"
"go.uber.org/goleak"
)
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m)
}
To exclude specific goroutine stacks (for known leaks or library goroutines):
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m,
goleak.IgnoreCurrent(),
)
}
Or per-test:
func TestWorkerPool(t *testing.T) {
defer goleak.VerifyNone(t)
// ... test code ...
}
testing/synctest (Go 1.25+) provides deterministic tests for goroutines, timers, deadlines, and context cancellation. Time advances only when all goroutines are blocked, making ordering predictable.
When to use synctest instead of real time:
import (
"context"
"testing"
"testing/synctest"
"time"
)
func TestContextTimeout(t *testing.T) {
synctest.Test(t, func(t *testing.T) {
const timeout = 5 * time.Second
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(t.Context(), timeout)
defer cancel()
time.Sleep(timeout - time.Nanosecond)
synctest.Wait()
if err := ctx.Err(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("before timeout: %v", err)
}
time.Sleep(time.Nanosecond)
synctest.Wait()
if err := ctx.Err(); err != context.DeadlineExceeded {
t.Fatalf("after timeout: got %v, want DeadlineExceeded", err)
}
})
}
Use synctest.Test in Go 1.25+ and Go 1.26+. Do not use the old Go 1.24 experimental synctest.Run API in Go 1.25+ or Go 1.26+ code. If a module explicitly targets Go 1.24 and opts into GOEXPERIMENT=synctest, use the old API only as a compatibility fallback.
Key differences in synctest:
time.Sleep advances synthetic time instantly when the goroutine blockstime.After fires when synthetic time reaches the durationFor tests that may hang, use a timeout helper that panics with caller location. See Helpers.
→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for advanced benchmarking: b.Loop() (Go 1.24+), benchstat, profiling from benchmarks, and CI regression detection.
Write benchmarks to measure performance and detect regressions:
func BenchmarkStringConcatenation(b *testing.B) {
b.Run("plus-operator", func(b *testing.B) {
for b.Loop() {
result := "a" + "b" + "c"
_ = result
}
})
b.Run("strings.Builder", func(b *testing.B) {
for b.Loop() {
var builder strings.Builder
builder.WriteString("a")
builder.WriteString("b")
builder.WriteString("c")
_ = builder.String()
}
})
}
Benchmarks with different input sizes:
func BenchmarkFibonacci(b *testing.B) {
sizes := []int{10, 20, 30}
for _, size := range sizes {
b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("n=%d", size), func(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
for b.Loop() {
Fibonacci(size)
}
})
}
}
For Go 1.24+, new benchmarks should use b.Loop(). Use legacy b.N loops only when the module targets Go <1.24 or when preserving old benchmark code intentionally.
When a test, benchmark, or fuzz target needs to persist files for inspection, use ArtifactDir() instead of ad-hoc paths or repo-local output.
func TestRenderGoldenArtifact(t *testing.T) {
dir := t.ArtifactDir()
out := filepath.Join(dir, "rendered.json")
if err := os.WriteFile(out, renderedBytes, 0o644); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
t.Logf("artifact written: %s", out)
}
Available on *testing.T, *testing.B, and *testing.F in Go 1.26+.
Use t.Parallel() to run tests concurrently:
func TestParallelOperations(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
data []byte
}{
{"small data", make([]byte, 1024)},
{"medium data", make([]byte, 1024*1024)},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
is := assert.New(t)
result := Process(tt.data)
is.NotNil(result)
})
}
}
Use fuzzing to find edge cases and bugs:
func FuzzReverse(f *testing.F) {
f.Add("hello")
f.Add("")
f.Add("a")
f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
reversed := Reverse(input)
doubleReversed := Reverse(reversed)
if input != doubleReversed {
t.Errorf("Reverse(Reverse(%q)) = %q, want %q", input, doubleReversed, input)
}
})
}
Examples are executable documentation verified by go test:
func ExampleCalculatePrice() {
price := CalculatePrice(100, 10.0)
fmt.Printf("Price: %.2f\n", price)
// Output: Price: 900.00
}
func ExampleCalculatePrice_singleItem() {
price := CalculatePrice(1, 25.50)
fmt.Printf("Price: %.2f\n", price)
// Output: Price: 25.50
}
# Generate coverage file
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
# View coverage in HTML
go tool cover -html=coverage.out
# Coverage by function
go tool cover -func=coverage.out
# Total coverage percentage
go tool cover -func=coverage.out | grep total
Use build tags to separate integration tests from unit tests:
//go:build integration
package mypackage
func TestDatabaseIntegration(t *testing.T) {
db, err := sql.Open("postgres", os.Getenv("DATABASE_URL"))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer db.Close()
// Test real database operations
}
Run integration tests separately:
go test -tags=integration ./...
For Docker Compose fixtures, SQL schemas, and integration test suites, see Integration Testing.
Mock interfaces, not concrete types. Define interfaces where consumed, then create mock implementations.
For mock patterns, test fixtures, and time mocking, see Mocking.
Many test best practices are enforced automatically by linters: thelper, paralleltest, testifylint. See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for configuration and usage.
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify skill for detailed testify API (assert, require, mock, suite)samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill (testing.md) for database integration test patternssamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency skill for goroutine leak detection with goleaksamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for CI test configuration and GitHub Actions workflowssamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for testifylint and paralleltest configurationsamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelinesgo test ./... # all tests
go test -run TestName ./... # specific test by exact name
go test -run TestName/subtest ./... # subtests within a test
go test -run 'Test(Add|Sub)' ./... # multiple tests (regexp OR)
go test -run 'Test[A-Z]' ./... # tests starting with capital letter
go test -run 'TestUser.*' ./... # tests matching prefix
go test -run '.*Validation.*' ./... # tests containing substring
go test -run TestName/. ./... # all subtests of TestName
go test -run '/(unit|integration)' ./... # filter by subtest name
go test -race ./... # race detection
go test -cover ./... # coverage summary
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./... # benchmarks
go test -fuzz=FuzzName ./... # fuzzing
go test -tags=integration ./... # integration tests
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.