external/cc-skills-golang/golang-structs-interfaces/SKILL.md
Golang struct and interface design patterns — composition, embedding, type assertions, type switches, interface segregation, dependency injection via interfaces, struct field tags, and pointer vs value receivers. Use this skill when designing Go types, defining or implementing interfaces, embedding structs or interfaces, writing type assertions or type switches, adding struct field tags for JSON/YAML/DB serialization, or choosing between pointer and value receivers. Also use when the user asks about "accept interfaces, return structs", compile-time interface checks, or composing small interfaces into larger ones.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills golang-structs-interfacesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Persona: You are a Go type system designer. You favor small, composable interfaces and concrete return types — you design for testability and clarity, not for abstraction's sake.
Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfacesskill takes precedence.
"The bigger the interface, the weaker the abstraction." — Go Proverbs
Interfaces SHOULD have 1-3 methods. Small interfaces are easier to implement, mock, and compose. If you need a larger contract, compose it from small interfaces:
→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for interface naming conventions (method + "-er" suffix, canonical names)
type Reader interface {
Read(p []byte) (n int, err error)
}
type Writer interface {
Write(p []byte) (n int, err error)
}
// Composed from small interfaces
type ReadWriter interface {
Reader
Writer
}
Compose larger interfaces from smaller ones:
type ReadWriteCloser interface {
io.Reader
io.Writer
io.Closer
}
Interfaces Belong to Consumers.
Interfaces MUST be defined where consumed, not where implemented. This keeps the consumer in control of the contract and avoids importing a package just for its interface.
// package notification — defines only what it needs
type Sender interface {
Send(to, body string) error
}
type Service struct {
sender Sender
}
The email package exports a concrete Client struct — it doesn't need to know about Sender.
Functions SHOULD accept interface parameters for flexibility and return concrete types for clarity. Callers get full access to the returned type's fields and methods; consumers upstream can still assign the result to an interface variable if needed.
// Good — accepts interface, returns concrete
func NewService(store UserStore) *Service { ... }
// BAD — NEVER return interfaces from constructors
func NewService(store UserStore) ServiceInterface { ... }
"Don't design with interfaces, discover them."
NEVER create interfaces prematurely — wait for 2+ implementations or a testability requirement. Premature interfaces add indirection without value. Start with concrete types; extract an interface when a second consumer or a test mock demands it.
// Bad — premature interface with a single implementation
type UserRepository interface {
FindByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
}
type userRepository struct { db *sql.DB }
// Good — start concrete, extract an interface later when needed
type UserRepository struct { db *sql.DB }
Design structs so they work without explicit initialization. A well-designed zero value reduces constructor boilerplate and prevents nil-related bugs:
// Good — zero value is ready to use
var buf bytes.Buffer
buf.WriteString("hello")
var mu sync.Mutex
mu.Lock()
// Bad — zero value is broken, requires constructor
type Registry struct {
items map[string]Item // nil map, panics on write
}
// Good — lazy initialization guards the zero value
func (r *Registry) Register(name string, item Item) {
if r.items == nil {
r.items = make(map[string]Item)
}
r.items[name] = item
}
any / interface{} When a Specific Type Will DoSince Go 1.18+, MUST prefer generics over any for type-safe operations. Use any only at true boundaries where the type is genuinely unknown (e.g., JSON decoding, reflection):
// Bad — loses type safety
func Contains(slice []any, target any) bool { ... }
// Good — generic, type-safe
func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }
| Interface | Package | Method |
| ------------- | --------------- | ------------------------------------- |
| Reader | io | Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) |
| Writer | io | Write(p []byte) (n int, err error) |
| Closer | io | Close() error |
| Stringer | fmt | String() string |
| error | builtin | Error() string |
| Handler | net/http | ServeHTTP(ResponseWriter, *Request) |
| Marshaler | encoding/json | MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) |
| Unmarshaler | encoding/json | UnmarshalJSON([]byte) error |
Canonical method signatures MUST be honored — if your type has a String() method, it must match fmt.Stringer. Don't invent ToString() or ReadData().
Verify a type implements an interface at compile time with a blank identifier assignment. Place it near the type definition:
var _ io.ReadWriter = (*MyBuffer)(nil)
This costs nothing at runtime. If MyBuffer ever stops satisfying io.ReadWriter, the build fails immediately.
Type assertions MUST use the comma-ok form to avoid panics:
// Good — safe
s, ok := val.(string)
if !ok {
// handle
}
// Bad — panics if val is not a string
s := val.(string)
Discover the dynamic type of an interface value:
switch v := val.(type) {
case string:
fmt.Println(v)
case int:
fmt.Println(v * 2)
case io.Reader:
io.Copy(os.Stdout, v)
default:
fmt.Printf("unexpected type %T\n", v)
}
Check if a value supports additional capabilities without requiring them upfront:
type Flusher interface {
Flush() error
}
func writeData(w io.Writer, data []byte) error {
if _, err := w.Write(data); err != nil {
return err
}
// Flush only if the writer supports it
if f, ok := w.(Flusher); ok {
return f.Flush()
}
return nil
}
This pattern is used extensively in the standard library (e.g., http.Flusher, io.ReaderFrom).
Embedding promotes the inner type's methods and fields to the outer type — composition, not inheritance:
type Logger struct {
*slog.Logger
}
type Server struct {
Logger
addr string
}
// s.Info(...) works — promoted from slog.Logger through Logger
s := Server{Logger: Logger{slog.Default()}, addr: ":8080"}
s.Info("starting", "addr", s.addr)
The receiver of promoted methods is the inner type, not the outer. The outer type can override by defining its own method with the same name.
| Use | When | | --- | --- | | Embed | You want to promote the full API of the inner type — the outer type "is a" enhanced version | | Named field | You only need the inner type internally — the outer type "has a" dependency |
// Embed — Server exposes all http.Handler methods
type Server struct {
http.Handler
}
// Named field — Server uses the store but doesn't expose its methods
type Server struct {
store *DataStore
}
Accept dependencies as interfaces in constructors. This decouples components and makes testing straightforward:
type UserStore interface {
FindByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
}
type UserService struct {
store UserStore
}
func NewUserService(store UserStore) *UserService {
return &UserService{store: store}
}
In tests, pass a mock or stub that satisfies UserStore — no real database needed.
Use field tags for serialization control. Exported fields in serialized structs MUST have field tags:
type Order struct {
ID string `json:"id" db:"id"`
UserID string `json:"user_id" db:"user_id"`
Total float64 `json:"total" db:"total"`
Items []Item `json:"items" db:"-"`
CreatedAt time.Time `json:"created_at" db:"created_at"`
DeletedAt time.Time `json:"-" db:"deleted_at"`
Internal string `json:"-" db:"-"`
}
| Directive | Meaning |
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| json:"name" | Field name in JSON output |
| json:"name,omitempty" | Omit field if zero value |
| json:"-" | Always exclude from JSON |
| json:",string" | Encode number/bool as JSON string |
| db:"column" | Database column mapping (sqlx, etc.) |
| yaml:"name" | YAML field name |
| xml:"name,attr" | XML attribute |
| validate:"required" | Struct validation (go-playground/validator) |
| Use pointer (s *Server) | Use value (s Server) |
| --- | --- |
| Method modifies the receiver | Receiver is small and immutable |
| Receiver contains sync.Mutex or similar | Receiver is a basic type (int, string) |
| Receiver is a large struct | Method is a read-only accessor |
| Consistency: if any method uses a pointer, all should | Map and function values (already reference types) |
Receiver type MUST be consistent across all methods of a type — if one method uses a pointer receiver, all methods should.
noCopySome structs must never be copied after first use (e.g., those containing a mutex, a channel, or internal pointers). Embed a noCopy sentinel to make go vet catch accidental copies:
// noCopy may be added to structs which must not be copied after first use.
// See https://pkg.go.dev/sync#noCopy
type noCopy struct{}
func (*noCopy) Lock() {}
func (*noCopy) Unlock() {}
type ConnPool struct {
noCopy noCopy
mu sync.Mutex
conns []*Conn
}
go vet reports an error if a ConnPool value is copied (passed by value, assigned, etc.). This is the same technique the standard library uses for sync.WaitGroup, sync.Mutex, strings.Builder, and others.
Always pass these structs by pointer:
// Good
func process(pool *ConnPool) { ... }
// Bad — go vet will flag this
func process(pool ConnPool) { ... }
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for interface naming conventions (Reader, Closer, Stringer)samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill for functional options, constructors, and builder patternssamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI patterns using interfacessamber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style skill for value vs pointer function parameters (distinct from receivers)samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill for safe rename and the implementInterface code action — renaming a method or receiver that participates in interface satisfaction updates every call site and refuses a rename that would silently break the interface, which grep/sed cannot detect| Mistake | Fix |
| --- | --- |
| Large interfaces (5+ methods) | Split into focused 1-3 method interfaces, compose if needed |
| Defining interfaces in the implementor package | Define where consumed |
| Returning interfaces from constructors | Return concrete types |
| Bare type assertions without comma-ok | Always use v, ok := x.(T) |
| Embedding when you only need a few methods | Use a named field and delegate explicitly |
| Missing field tags on serialized structs | Tag all exported fields in marshaled types |
| Mixing pointer and value receivers on a type | Pick one and be consistent |
| Forgetting compile-time interface check | Add var _ Interface = (*Type)(nil) |
| Using ToString() instead of String() | Honor canonical method names |
| Premature interface with a single implementation | Start concrete, extract interface when needed |
| Nil map/slice in zero value struct | Use lazy initialization in methods |
| Using any for type-safe operations | Use generics ([T comparable]) instead |
development
拋棄式 HTML mockup 比稿:產出 2 到 3 個設計立場不同的變體(密度 / 版式 / 強調軸,不是換色),各附取捨說明,最後給有立場的對比結論。適用:「畫個草圖」「比較 A 版 B 版」「先看方向再做」「給我看幾種做法」。要 production 元件或設計已定案時不適用。
tools
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
testing
Reference for writing and editing agent skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable. Consult when authoring, reviewing, or pruning a SKILL.md.