external/trailofbits-security/trailmark/skills/diagramming-code/SKILL.md
Generates Mermaid diagrams from Trailmark code graphs. Produces call graphs, class hierarchies, module dependency maps, containment diagrams, complexity heatmaps, and attack surface data flow visualizations. Use when visualizing code architecture, drawing call graphs, generating class diagrams, creating dependency maps, producing complexity heatmaps, or visualizing data flow and attack surface paths as Mermaid diagrams.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills diagramming-codeInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generates Mermaid diagrams from Trailmark's code graph. A pre-made script
handles Mermaid syntax generation; Claude selects the diagram type and
parameters. Trailmark 0.4.0 includes a native trailmark diagram command; use
it only after a version/command check, otherwise use this skill's bundled
script.
trailmark skill)genotoxic skill)trailmark must be installed. If uv run trailmark fails, run:
uv pip install trailmark
DO NOT fall back to hand-writing Mermaid from source code reading. The script uses Trailmark's parsed graph for accuracy. If installation fails, report the error to the user.
Check whether native v0.4 diagram support exists:
trailmark diagram --help 2>/dev/null || uv run trailmark diagram --help 2>/dev/null
If this succeeds, you may use trailmark diagram. If it fails, use
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py, which keeps the older skill workflow
intact. Do not assume the native CLI exists on Trailmark 0.2.x.
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py \
--target {targetDir} --language auto --type call-graph \
--focus main --depth 2
# Trailmark 0.4.0+ equivalent after the Version Gate succeeds
uv run trailmark diagram \
--target {targetDir} --language auto --type call-graph \
--focus main --depth 2
Output is raw Mermaid text. Wrap in a fenced code block:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
...
```
├─ "Who calls what?" → --type call-graph
├─ "Class inheritance?" → --type class-hierarchy
├─ "Module dependencies?" → --type module-deps
├─ "Class members and structure?" → --type containment
├─ "Where is complexity highest?" → --type complexity
└─ "Path from input to function?" → --type data-flow
For detailed examples of each type, see references/diagram-types.md.
Diagram Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Verify trailmark is installed
- [ ] Step 2: Identify diagram type from user request
- [ ] Step 3: Determine focus node and parameters
- [ ] Step 4: Run diagram.py script (or native trailmark diagram on v0.4+)
- [ ] Step 5: Verify output is non-empty and well-formed
- [ ] Step 6: Embed diagram in response
Step 1: Run uv run trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {targetDir}. Install
if it fails. Then run pre-analysis via the programmatic API:
from trailmark.query.api import QueryEngine
engine = QueryEngine.from_directory("{targetDir}", language="auto")
engine.preanalysis()
Pre-analysis enriches the graph with blast radius, taint propagation,
and privilege boundary data used by data-flow diagrams.
If auto-detection is wrong for the target, rerun with an explicit language or
comma-separated list such as python,rust.
Step 2: Match the user's request to a --type using the decision tree
above.
Step 3: For call-graph and data-flow, identify the focus function.
Default --depth 2. Use --direction LR for dependency flows.
Step 4: Run the script and capture stdout. If the native v0.4 CLI is available, either command is acceptable; prefer the bundled script when you need behavior consistent with this skill's references.
Step 5: Check: output starts with flowchart or classDiagram,
contains at least one node. If empty or malformed, consult
references/mermaid-syntax.md.
Step 6: Wrap output in ```mermaid ``` code fence.
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py [OPTIONS]
# or, on Trailmark 0.4.0+:
uv run trailmark diagram [OPTIONS]
| Argument | Short | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| --target | -t | required | Directory to analyze |
| --language | -l | python | Source language |
| --type | -T | required | Diagram type (see above) |
| --focus | -f | none | Center diagram on this node |
| --depth | -d | 2 | BFS traversal depth |
| --direction | | TB | Layout: TB (top-bottom) or LR (left-right) |
| --threshold | | 10 | Min complexity for complexity type |
# Call graph centered on a function
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T call-graph -f parse_file
# Class hierarchy for a Rust project
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -l rust -T class-hierarchy
# Module dependency map, left-to-right
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T module-deps --direction LR
# Class members
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T containment
# Complexity heatmap (threshold 5)
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T complexity --threshold 5
# Data flow from entrypoints to a specific function
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T data-flow -f execute_query
Direction: Use TB (default) for hierarchical views, LR for
left-to-right flows like dependency chains.
Depth: Increase --depth to see more of the call graph. Decrease to
reduce clutter. The script warns if the diagram exceeds 100 nodes.
Focus: Always use --focus for call-graph on non-trivial codebases.
For data-flow, omitting focus auto-targets the top 10 complexity hotspots.
Language: Prefer --language auto for polyglot or unfamiliar repos.
Use an explicit language only when you know the target is single-language or
you need to exclude unrelated components.
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.