external/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-incident-response-dashboard/SKILL.md
Builds real-time incident response dashboards in Splunk, Elastic, or Grafana to provide SOC analysts and leadership with situational awareness during active incidents, tracking affected systems, containment status, IOC spread, and response timeline. Use when IR teams need unified visibility during incident coordination and post-incident reporting.
npx skillsauth add seikaikyo/dash-skills building-incident-response-dashboardInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill when:
Do not use for day-to-day SOC monitoring dashboards (use Incident Review instead) — IR dashboards are designed for active incident coordination and management reporting.
Build a Splunk Dashboard Studio dashboard for active incident tracking:
<dashboard version="2" theme="dark">
<label>Active Incident Response Dashboard</label>
<description>Real-time tracking for IR-2024-0450</description>
<row>
<panel>
<title>Incident Summary</title>
<single>
<search>
<query>
| makeresults
| eval incident_id="IR-2024-0450",
status="CONTAINMENT",
severity="Critical",
affected_hosts=7,
contained_hosts=5,
iocs_identified=23,
hours_elapsed=round((now()-strptime("2024-03-15 14:00","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M"))/3600,1)
| table incident_id, status, severity, affected_hosts, contained_hosts, iocs_identified, hours_elapsed
</query>
</search>
</single>
</panel>
</row>
</dashboard>
Track affected systems and their containment status:
| inputlookup ir_affected_systems.csv
| eval status_color = case(
status="Contained", "#2ecc71",
status="Compromised", "#e74c3c",
status="Investigating", "#f39c12",
status="Recovered", "#3498db",
1=1, "#95a5a6"
)
| stats count by status
| eval order = case(status="Compromised", 1, status="Investigating", 2,
status="Contained", 3, status="Recovered", 4)
| sort order
| table status, count
--- Detailed host table
| inputlookup ir_affected_systems.csv
| lookup asset_lookup_by_cidr ip AS host_ip OUTPUT category, owner, priority
| table hostname, host_ip, category, owner, status, containment_time,
compromise_vector, analyst_assigned
| sort status, hostname
Monitor IOC spread across the environment:
--- IOCs identified during incident
index=* (src_ip IN ("185.234.218.50", "45.77.123.45") OR
dest IN ("evil-c2.com", "malware-drop.com") OR
file_hash IN ("a1b2c3d4...", "e5f6a7b8..."))
earliest="2024-03-14"
| stats count AS hits, dc(src_ip) AS unique_sources,
dc(dest) AS unique_dests, latest(_time) AS last_seen
by sourcetype
| sort - hits
--- IOC timeline
index=* (src_ip IN ("185.234.218.50") OR dest="evil-c2.com")
earliest="2024-03-14"
| timechart span=1h count by sourcetype
--- New IOC discovery tracking
| inputlookup ir_ioc_list.csv
| stats count by ioc_type, source, discovery_time
| sort discovery_time
| table discovery_time, ioc_type, ioc_value, source, status
Create chronological incident timeline:
| inputlookup ir_timeline.csv
| sort _time
| eval phase = case(
action_type="detection", "Detection",
action_type="triage", "Triage",
action_type="containment", "Containment",
action_type="eradication", "Eradication",
action_type="recovery", "Recovery",
1=1, "Other"
)
| eval phase_color = case(
phase="Detection", "#e74c3c",
phase="Triage", "#f39c12",
phase="Containment", "#e67e22",
phase="Eradication", "#2ecc71",
phase="Recovery", "#3498db"
)
| table _time, phase, action, analyst, details
Example timeline data:
_time,action_type,action,analyst,details
2024-03-15 14:00,detection,Alert triggered - Cobalt Strike beacon detected,splunk_es,Notable event NE-2024-08921
2024-03-15 14:12,triage,Alert triaged - confirmed true positive,analyst_jdoe,VT score 52/72 on beacon hash
2024-03-15 14:23,containment,Host WORKSTATION-042 isolated,analyst_jdoe,CrowdStrike network isolation
2024-03-15 14:35,containment,C2 domain blocked on firewall,analyst_msmith,Palo Alto rule deployed
2024-03-15 15:00,eradication,Enterprise-wide IOC scan initiated,analyst_jdoe,Splunk search across all indices
2024-03-15 15:30,containment,3 additional hosts identified and isolated,analyst_msmith,Lateral movement confirmed
2024-03-15 16:00,eradication,Malware removed from all affected hosts,analyst_tier3,CrowdStrike RTR cleanup
2024-03-15 18:00,recovery,Systems restored and monitored,analyst_msmith,72-hour monitoring period started
Track overall SOC performance metrics:
--- Incident volume by severity (last 30 days)
index=notable earliest=-30d
| stats count by urgency
| eval order = case(urgency="critical", 1, urgency="high", 2, urgency="medium", 3,
urgency="low", 4, urgency="informational", 5)
| sort order
--- MTTD (Mean Time to Detect)
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttd_minutes = round((time_of_first_event - orig_time) / 60, 1)
| stats avg(mttd_minutes) AS avg_mttd, median(mttd_minutes) AS med_mttd,
perc95(mttd_minutes) AS p95_mttd
--- MTTR (Mean Time to Respond/Resolve)
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttr_hours = round((status_end - _time) / 3600, 1)
| stats avg(mttr_hours) AS avg_mttr, median(mttr_hours) AS med_mttr by urgency
--- Analyst workload distribution
index=notable earliest=-7d
| stats count by owner
| sort - count
--- Alert disposition breakdown
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label IN ("Resolved*", "Closed*")
| stats count by disposition
| eval percentage = round(count / sum(count) * 100, 1)
| sort - count
Create a high-level dashboard for leadership during major incidents:
--- Executive summary panel
| makeresults
| eval metrics = "Business Impact: 1 file server offline (Finance dept), "
."Estimated Recovery: 4 hours, "
."Data Loss Risk: Low (backups verified), "
."Customer Impact: None, "
."Regulatory Notification: Not required (no PII exposure confirmed)"
--- Trend comparison (this month vs last month)
index=notable earliest=-60d
| eval period = if(_time > relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "Current Month", "Previous Month")
| stats count by period, urgency
| chart sum(count) AS incidents by period, urgency
--- Top threat categories
index=notable earliest=-30d
| top rule_name limit=10
| table rule_name, count, percent
Use Splunk scheduled searches to maintain dashboard data:
--- Scheduled search to update affected systems lookup (runs every 5 minutes)
index=* (src_ip IN [| inputlookup ir_ioc_list.csv | search ioc_type="ip"
| fields ioc_value | rename ioc_value AS src_ip])
earliest=-1h
| stats latest(_time) AS last_seen, count AS event_count,
values(sourcetype) AS data_sources by src_ip
| eval status = if(last_seen > relative_time(now(), "-15m"), "Active", "Dormant")
| outputlookup ir_affected_systems_auto.csv
| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | Situational Awareness | Real-time understanding of incident scope, affected systems, and response progress | | MTTD | Mean Time to Detect — average time from threat occurrence to SOC alert generation | | MTTR | Mean Time to Respond — average time from alert to incident resolution or containment | | Containment Rate | Percentage of affected systems successfully isolated relative to total compromised systems | | Burn-Down Chart | Visual tracking of remaining open investigation tasks over time during an incident | | Executive Briefing | Non-technical summary dashboard showing business impact, timeline, and recovery status |
INCIDENT RESPONSE DASHBOARD — IR-2024-0450
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
STATUS: CONTAINMENT PHASE (6h 30m elapsed)
Affected Systems: Containment Progress:
Compromised: 2 [==========----------] 71%
Investigating: 1 5 of 7 systems contained
Contained: 3
Recovered: 1
IOC Summary: Response Timeline:
IPs: 4 14:00 — Alert triggered
Domains: 2 14:12 — Confirmed malicious
Hashes: 3 14:23 — First host isolated
URLs: 5 15:00 — Enterprise scan started
Emails: 1 15:30 — 3 more hosts isolated
Key Metrics:
MTTD: 12 minutes
MTTC: 23 minutes (first host)
Analysts Active: 3 (Tier 2: 2, Tier 3: 1)
Business Impact: LOW — Finance file server offline, no customer-facing systems affected
tools
Conduct comprehensive GDPR compliance assessments by evaluating data processing activities against EU Regulation 2016/679, including Article 30 records of processing, lawful basis validation, data subject rights implementation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under Article 35, breach notification procedures, international transfer safeguards (SCCs, adequacy decisions), and technical/organizational measures under Article 32. Use when processing personal data of EU residents, preparing for supervisory authority audits, implementing privacy-by-design for new systems, scoping compliance gaps for M&A due diligence, assessing third-party processors, or responding to data subject access requests at scale. Incorporates 2026 guidance from ICO, EDPB, and post-Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 UK-GDPR considerations. Do not use for implementing specific Article 32 controls — use implementing-gdpr-data-protection-controls; or for DSAR automation — use implementing-gdpr-data-subject-access-request.
tools
Parse Windows forensic artifacts—$MFT/$J (MFTECmd), Prefetch (PECmd), registry hives (RECmd), shellbags, and Amcache—into normalized CSV/JSON with Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools, then load results into Timeline Explorer for analysis. Use during DFIR/incident-response investigations, after triage collection (e.g. with KAPE), to establish program execution, file/folder access, and persistence evidence from acquired forensic images.
development
Build automated multi-turn adversarial attacks against conversational LLM targets using Microsoft PyRIT's RedTeamingOrchestrator, CrescendoOrchestrator (gradual escalation), and TreeOfAttacksWithPruningOrchestrator (adaptive branching), with scorer feedback loops and persisted conversation memory. Use when single-shot LLM scanning is insufficient and you need multi-turn, scorer-driven AI red-team campaigns against a chatbot or agent.
testing
Stand up MISP, enable and cache curated threat feeds (CIRCL, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker), apply warninglists to suppress false positives, query indicators with PyMISP, and export attributes as auto-generated Suricata/Sigma/Wazuh detection rules. Use when maturing a MISP instance to actively drive detection, curating threat feeds with quality controls, or automating IOC-to-detection pipelines for the SIEM/IDS.