Skills/writing-fragments/SKILL.md
Grilling session that mines the user for fragments - heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) - and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.
npx skillsauth add sammcj/agentic-coding writing-fragmentsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Run a grilling session that produces fragments. Interview the user relentlessly about whatever they want to write about. Do not impose phases, outlines, or structure - that is explicitly out of scope.
As fragments emerge from either side of the conversation, append them to a single markdown file. The user will be editing this file during the session; always re-read it before writing so their edits are preserved.
If the user did not pass a path, ask once where to save the document, then remember it for the rest of the session.
Capture fragments from the very first thing the user says, including the initial prompt.
On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change later) and nothing else - no metadata, no TOC, no date.
</what-to-do> <supporting-info>A fragment is any piece of text that might survive into the final article. It must be readable by the author - the author can tell what it means - but it does not need to define its terms or be comprehensible to a cold reader. The bar is "is this a piece of good writing?", not "is this a self-contained argument?"
Fragments are deliberately heterogeneous. Examples of what could be a fragment:
The novelist's diary is the model: years of unstructured noticings that later get mined for raw material. Fragments are noticings.
# Working title
A first fragment lives here.
It can be multiple paragraphs. It can include lists, code, quotes - whatever
shape the fragment naturally takes.
---
A second fragment.
---
> A quoted line that the user wants to keep around.
A reaction to it.
---
- A cluster of related observations
- That hang together by feel
- And want to be near each other
Fragments are separated by a horizontal rule (\n---\n). No headings inside the body. No tags. No order beyond the order they were added.
Append silently. Don't ask permission for each fragment. Mention what you added in passing ("adding that"), but don't interrupt the conversation with save dialogues.
Before every write: re-read the file from disk. The user may have edited, reordered, or deleted fragments between turns - preserve their changes. Never overwrite the file; only append (or, if the user asks, edit a specific fragment in place).
The user can say "cut the last one", "rewrite that one sharper", "merge those two" at any time. Treat those as first-class instructions.
</supporting-info>tools
Provides tools for managing MarkEdit, a macOS markdown editor
tools
Provides knowledge on using the `glean` CLI tool to access company knowledge and documents through Glean. Use when the user asks you to use Glean to search, read or otherwise access knowledge from their company's Confluence, Slack, Google Drive Files (Slides, Documents, Sheets) etc.
development
Applies the Diataxis framework to create or improve technical documentation. Use when being asked to write high quality tutorials, how-to guides, reference docs, or explanations, when reviewing documentation quality, or when deciding what type of documentation to create. Helps identify documentation types using the action/cognition and acquisition/application dimensions.
development
Use when answering questions from this machine-learning knowledge base. Triggers: questions about transformers, attention cost and efficiency, and long-context scaling; 'what do we know about attention', 'check the ML wiki'. Read-only querying of compiled knowledge; to add, update, supersede, lint, audit, or critique, use the llm-wiki skill instead.