skills/stage5/final-remarks/SKILL.md
Fill a Stage5 final remarks template using condensed discussion markdown from all reviewers and optional rating changes. Use when generating final remarks after Stage3/Stage4 discussion.
npx skillsauth add runtsang/rebuttalstudio stage5-final-remarksInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generate a complete Stage5 final remarks markdown by filling template placeholders from multi-reviewer evidence.
template_markdown: placeholder-based template source.reviewer_summaries: array of reviewer records, each containing:
reviewerIdcondensedMarkdownoriginalRating (optional)finalRating (optional)If template_markdown is empty, use references/run-template.md.
Return strict JSON:
{ "filledMarkdown": "..." }
reviewer_summaries only.{{key_strengths_points_markdown}} as a concise markdown bullet list with 4-5 items summarized across reviewers.{{concern_rows_markdown}}.data-ai
Remove AI-generated writing patterns from rebuttal prose to make it sound natural, direct, and authentically human-authored. Use when a Stage 2 refined draft or Stage 4 follow-up response reads too formulaic, robotic, or "GPT-like". Supports academic English.
testing
Condense rebuttal prose into fewer words without changing the original meaning. Use when a response block, paragraph, or selected passage is too long but all technical content, citations, and commitments must stay intact. Supports academic English.
development
Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.
testing
Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.