skills/stage1/arr/SKILL.md
Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
npx skillsauth add runtsang/rebuttalstudio stage1-arr-breakdownInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Apply the shared template first:
skills/stage1/template/SKILL.mdThen apply only the ARR-specific overrides below.
Extract exactly these five keys (numbers only, decimals allowed):
confidence <- ARR Confidencesoundness <- ARR Soundnessexcitement <- ARR Excitementassessment <- ARR Overall Assessment (number before = sign)reproducibility <- ARR Reproducibility (number before = sign)summary <- Paper Summarystrength <- Summary Of StrengthsSummary Of WeaknessesComments Suggestions And Typos (label as suggestion)# Stage1 ARR Breakdown## Scores must contain exactly the five keys above.2.5, 3.5). Extract only the numeric part before any = or description text.Ethical Concerns, Datasets, Software, Knowledge Of Paper, and certification fields are irrelevant — ignore them.Comments Suggestions And Typos to the suggestion section and split it into atomic issues just as weaknesses are split.data-ai
Remove AI-generated writing patterns from rebuttal prose to make it sound natural, direct, and authentically human-authored. Use when a Stage 2 refined draft or Stage 4 follow-up response reads too formulaic, robotic, or "GPT-like". Supports academic English.
testing
Condense rebuttal prose into fewer words without changing the original meaning. Use when a response block, paragraph, or selected passage is too long but all technical content, citations, and commitments must stay intact. Supports academic English.
development
Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.
testing
Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.