skills/tdd-migrate/SKILL.md
TDD workflow for migrations - orchestrate agents, zero main context growth
npx skillsauth add rubicanjr/FinCognis tdd-migrateInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Orchestrate TDD migrations with agents doing all work. Main context stays clean.
/tdd-migrate <source_path> <target_path> --pattern <reference> --items "item1,item2,item3"
source_path: Path to analyze (existing code)target_path: Where to create new codepattern: Reference file/pattern to followitems: Comma-separated list of things to createPhase 0: YAML TODO List
│
▼
Phase 1: TLDR Analysis ─────────────────┐
│ │
▼ │ Parallel scouts
Phase 2: Write Failing Tests ───────────┤ per item
│ │
▼ │
Phase 3: Implement (minimal) ───────────┤
│ │
▼ │
Phase 4: Build + Pass Tests ────────────┘
│
▼
Phase 5: QLTY Check ────────────────────┐
│ │ Parallel
Phase 6: Review Agent Validates ────────┘
│
▼
Phase 7: TLDR Diff (new vs reference)
│
▼
Phase 8: Fix Issues (if any)
│
▼
Complete
Main context = orchestration only
Agents do ALL work | Task | Agent | |------|-------| | Explore/analyze | scout | | Write tests + implement | kraken | | Quick fixes | spark | | Run tests/validate | validator | | Code review | critic |
Parallel where independent
Review after each major step
Write a YAML plan file to thoughts/shared/plans/<name>-tdd.yaml:
---
title: <Migration Name>
date: <today>
type: implementation-plan
approach: TDD (test → build → pass → review)
items:
- name: item1
file: <target_path>/item1.ts
test: <target_path>/__tests__/item1.test.ts
deps: []
- name: item2
# ...
reference: <pattern_file>
workflow:
per_item:
1: Write failing test
2: Implement minimal
3: Build
4: Pass test
5: QLTY check
6: Review
final:
7: Integration test
8: TLDR diff
Task (scout): Analyze <source_path> with TLDR
Task (scout): Analyze <pattern> to understand structure
Task (scout): Read migration handoff if exists
For each item, launch ONE kraken that does full TDD:
Task (kraken): Implement <item> using TDD workflow
1. Read pattern file
2. Write failing test
3. Implement
4. Run: bun test <test_file>
5. Run: qlty check <impl_file>
Task (critic): Review all new files against pattern
Task (validator): Run full test suite
Task (validator): QLTY check all files
If critic/validator found issues:
Task (spark): Fix <specific issue>
Task (validator): Re-validate
Task (validator): TLDR diff new files vs reference
- tldr structure <new_file> --lang <lang>
- tldr structure <reference> --lang <lang>
- Compare patterns
Update ledger with completed work.
/tdd-migrate ~/your-project/src/sdk/providers \
~/your-project/src/sdk/providers \
--pattern lmstudio.ts \
--items "xai,cerebras,togetherai,deepinfra,perplexity"
Resulted in:
| Bad | Good | |-----|------| | Read files in main context | Launch scout agent | | Write code in main context | Launch kraken/spark agent | | Run tests in main context | Launch validator agent | | Skip review | Always launch critic | | Sequential items | Parallel krakens | | Fix in main context | Launch spark |
Explore <path> to understand:
1. Structure/patterns
2. Interfaces/types
3. Dependencies
Return actionable summary for implementation.
Implement <item> using TDD:
1. Read <pattern> for structure
2. Write failing test to <test_path>
3. Implement minimal to <impl_path>
4. Run: <test_command>
5. Run: qlty check <impl_path>
Report: status, issues, files created.
Review <files> against <pattern>:
1. Pattern compliance
2. Type safety
3. Missing registrations
4. Security issues
DO NOT edit. Report issues only.
Fix <specific issue>:
1. Read <file>
2. Make minimal edit
3. Verify fix
Validate <files>:
1. Run <test_command>
2. Run qlty check
3. Report pass/fail/issues
development
Goal-based workflow orchestration - routes tasks to specialist agents based on user goals
tools
Wiring Verification
development
Connection management, room patterns, reconnection strategies, message buffering, and binary protocol design.
development
Screenshot comparison QA for frontend development. Takes a screenshot of the current implementation, scores it across multiple visual dimensions, and returns a structured PASS/REVISE/FAIL verdict with concrete fixes. Use when implementing UI from a design reference or verifying visual correctness.