skills/llm-council/SKILL.md
Provider-agnostic multi-LLM deliberation. Three phases — independent responses, cross-model anonymized ranking, chairman synthesis. Provider config from env (OPENAI/ANTHROPIC/FIREWORKS/OPENROUTER/custom OpenAI-compatible base URL). Persists transcript to a wiki page when --wiki <slug> is passed. Use when the user wants multiple AI perspectives, consensus-building, or the "LLM Council" approach for high-stakes reviews, plan critique, or contested learning rules.
npx skillsauth add rohitg00/pro-workflow llm-councilInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Karpathy's LLM Council pattern, provider-agnostic. dair-academy's version hardcoded Fireworks; ours reads any OpenAI-compatible endpoint via env.
/plan crosses N-file threshold)/council "<query>" or /wiki councilProvider chosen via env. First-match wins:
| Env var | Provider | Default base URL |
|---------|----------|------------------|
| ANTHROPIC_API_KEY | Anthropic | https://api.anthropic.com |
| OPENAI_API_KEY | OpenAI | https://api.openai.com/v1 |
| OPENROUTER_API_KEY | OpenRouter | https://openrouter.ai/api/v1 |
| FIREWORKS_API_KEY | Fireworks | https://api.fireworks.ai/inference/v1 |
| LLM_COUNCIL_BASE_URL + LLM_COUNCIL_API_KEY | Custom OpenAI-compat | (user-supplied) |
Override per-run with --provider openai|anthropic|openrouter|fireworks|custom.
Default model rosters per provider live in scripts/council.js and can be overridden via --models CSV and --chairman <id>.
node $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/council.js run "<query>" [--models id1,id2,id3] [--chairman id] [--provider <name>] [--wiki <slug>]
node $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/council.js providers
node $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/council.js show <session-id>
--wiki <slug> writes the full transcript to <wiki>/derived/council/<session-id>.md and registers it via wiki-cli.js page so it shows in FTS5 search.
Each session writes:
~/.pro-workflow/council/<session-id>/
├── config.json # query, models, chairman, provider
├── phase1_responses.json # raw API responses per model
├── phase2_rankings.json # anonymized ranking outputs
├── phase3_synthesis.txt # chairman's final answer
└── final_output.md # human-readable bundle
Console prints the markdown bundle. Pipe to pbcopy / tee as needed.
Response A/B/C/..., not peer names.The script logs per-call latency + tokens on supported providers. Multiply by your provider rate to estimate. Council cost grows linearly with len(models)^2 (each model ranks all others) plus the chairman.
Default council size: 3-5 models. More models = exponentially more ranking calls.
/wiki council agent-memory "should we adopt episodic memory in our agents?"
Loads agent-memory wiki context as system prompt prefix, runs council, persists transcript as wiki/derived/council/<id>.md. The transcript becomes searchable via /wiki ask.
documentation
Apply clear-writing standards to any prose the agent produces - READMEs, docs, UI copy, error messages, commit and PR text, release notes. Use when writing or editing documentation, interface copy, or any text a human will read. Says "write the README", "improve this copy", "draft the docs", "word this error".
development
Drive a change through a red-green-refactor loop - failing test first, minimal code to pass, then clean up. Use when implementing a feature or fixing a bug where correctness matters and a test can pin the behavior. Says "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write the test first".
tools
The index of every pro-workflow skill and command, grouped by job, with when to reach for each and whether it is human-run or auto-triggered. Use when you are not sure which skill fits, want the full map, or ask "what can this do", "which skill for X", "list the workflow".
development
Audit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.