skills/batch-orchestration/SKILL.md
Decompose large-scale changes into independent units and spawn parallel agents in isolated worktrees. Use for migrations, refactors, codemods, and any change touching 10+ files with the same pattern.
npx skillsauth add rohitg00/pro-workflow batch-orchestrationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The /batch command pattern for large-scale parallel changes.
/batch <instruction>
│
├── 1. Research: scan repo, understand scope
├── 2. Decompose: split into 5-30 independent units
├── 3. Present plan: show units, ask for approval
├── 4. Execute: one background agent per unit in isolated worktree
└── 5. Collect: each agent runs tests and opens a PR
/batch Convert all React class components to function components
/batch Add error boundaries to every page component
/batch Migrate from moment.js to dayjs across the codebase
/batch Add OpenTelemetry tracing to all API handlers
The instruction should describe the change pattern, not individual files. The batch system finds the files.
The orchestrator scans the repo to find every instance that matches the instruction:
grep -r "class.*extends.*Component" --include="*.tsx" -l
It builds a complete list of targets and groups them by independence.
Each unit must be:
Good units:
Unit 1: Convert src/components/Header.tsx (class → function)
Unit 2: Convert src/components/Footer.tsx (class → function)
Unit 3: Convert src/components/Sidebar.tsx (class → function)
Bad units:
Unit 1: Convert all components in src/components/ (too broad)
Unit 2: Fix issues from Unit 1 (dependent)
Target 5-30 units. Fewer than 5 doesn't justify the overhead. More than 30 and coordination costs grow.
The orchestrator presents:
BATCH: Convert class components to function components
Found: 18 class components across src/
Units (18):
1. src/components/Header.tsx — class Header → function
2. src/components/Footer.tsx — class Footer → function
...
18. src/pages/Settings.tsx — class Settings → function
Per unit: convert class to function, update hooks, run component tests
Estimated: ~2 min per unit, ~5 min total (parallel)
Proceed? (y/n)
Wait for approval. Never spawn agents without explicit confirmation.
After approval, for each unit:
Agents run in parallel. Each has its own context window and worktree — no conflicts.
[Agent 1] ── worktree-1 ── Header.tsx ── tests pass ── PR #41
[Agent 2] ── worktree-2 ── Footer.tsx ── tests pass ── PR #42
[Agent 3] ── worktree-3 ── Sidebar.tsx ── tests fail ── flagged
After all agents complete:
| Use Case | Why Batch Works | |----------|-----------------| | API migrations | Same pattern across many endpoints | | Dependency upgrades | Find/replace + fix across codebase | | Codemod-style refactors | Mechanical transformation, file by file | | Adding instrumentation | Same tracing/logging pattern everywhere | | Test coverage gaps | Add tests to untested modules independently | | Lint rule adoption | Apply new rule fixes across all files |
| Don't Batch | Why | |-------------|-----| | Interdependent changes | Units can't run in parallel if they depend on each other | | Shared state modifications | Multiple agents writing to the same config or state file | | Architecture changes | Need holistic reasoning, not file-by-file | | Schema migrations | Database changes must be sequential | | Changes requiring human judgment per file | Defeats the purpose of automation |
| Pattern | Scale | Isolation | |---------|-------|-----------| | Direct edit | 1-3 files | None needed | | Subagent | 1 focused task | Forked context | | Worktree | 1 feature branch | Full repo copy | | Agent teams | 3-5 parallel tasks | Shared task list | | Batch | 5-30 identical pattern | Full worktree per unit |
Batch is the heaviest tool. Use it when the change is mechanical, repetitive, and the units are truly independent.
documentation
Apply clear-writing standards to any prose the agent produces - READMEs, docs, UI copy, error messages, commit and PR text, release notes. Use when writing or editing documentation, interface copy, or any text a human will read. Says "write the README", "improve this copy", "draft the docs", "word this error".
development
Drive a change through a red-green-refactor loop - failing test first, minimal code to pass, then clean up. Use when implementing a feature or fixing a bug where correctness matters and a test can pin the behavior. Says "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write the test first".
tools
The index of every pro-workflow skill and command, grouped by job, with when to reach for each and whether it is human-run or auto-triggered. Use when you are not sure which skill fits, want the full map, or ask "what can this do", "which skill for X", "list the workflow".
development
Audit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.