skills/agent-teams/SKILL.md
Coordinate multiple Claude Code sessions as a team — lead + teammates with shared task lists, mailbox messaging, and file-lock claiming. Patterns for team sizing, task decomposition, and when to use teams vs sub-agents vs worktrees.
npx skillsauth add rohitg00/pro-workflow agent-teamsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Coordinate multiple Claude Code sessions working on the same codebase simultaneously.
export CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1
claude # starts as team lead
The first session becomes the team lead. Subsequent sessions in the same repo join as teammates.
Team Lead (coordinates, delegates, reviews)
├── Teammate 1 (owns task A, messages lead + peers)
├── Teammate 2 (owns task B, messages lead + peers)
└── Teammate 3 (owns task C, messages lead + peers)
│
└── Shared: task list + mailbox + file locks
Key difference from subagents: Teammates are full Claude Code sessions. They have their own context window, can use all tools, and message each other directly — not just report back to a parent.
| Team Size | Best For | |-----------|----------| | 2 | One builds, one reviews | | 3-5 | Parallel features across layers (API, UI, tests) | | > 5 | Coordination overhead outweighs parallelism |
3-5 teammates is the productive range. Beyond that, the lead spends more time coordinating than the team saves.
Task granularity: Aim for 5-6 tasks per teammate. Fewer means underutilization; more means excessive context switching.
In-process navigation:
Shift+Down — cycle through teammates (wraps around)Split-pane (recommended for >2 teammates):
tmux split-window -h per teammateclaude sessionTasks flow through states:
pending → in-progress → completed
│
└── blocked (waiting on dependency)
Break work into units that:
Good decomposition:
Task 1: Add rate limiting middleware (src/middleware/rate-limit.ts)
Task 2: Add rate limit tests (tests/rate-limit.test.ts)
Task 3: Update API docs for rate limit headers (docs/api.md)
Task 4: Add Redis config for rate limit store (src/config/redis.ts)
Bad decomposition:
Task 1: Implement rate limiting
Task 2: Fix rate limiting bugs
Task 3: Improve rate limiting
Tasks can declare dependencies:
Task 3 (API docs) → depends on Task 1 (middleware)
Task 2 (tests) → depends on Task 1 (middleware)
Task 4 (Redis config) → no dependencies
Teammates pick up unblocked tasks automatically.
Teammates claim files before editing to prevent conflicts:
If two teammates need the same file, one waits or the lead reassigns.
Teammates plan before implementing:
This prevents wasted work from misunderstood requirements.
Shift+Tab toggles delegate mode for the lead:
| Hook | Fires When | |------|------------| | TeammateIdle | A teammate finishes its task and has no pending work | | TaskCreated | New task added to the shared list | | TaskCompleted | A teammate marks a task done |
Use these to trigger notifications, auto-assign next tasks, or run integration tests when all tasks complete.
| Scenario | Use |
|----------|-----|
| Parallel work on non-overlapping files | Agent teams |
| Quick background exploration | Subagent |
| Isolated feature branch work | Worktree (claude -w) |
| Competing approaches to same problem | Worktrees (compare results) |
| Cross-layer changes (API + UI + tests) | Agent teams |
| One-off delegation | Subagent with isolation: worktree |
| Large-scale migration (20+ files) | /batch command |
Lead: "We need rate limiting. Breaking into 4 tasks."
Task 1: middleware implementation → Teammate 1
Task 2: Redis config → Teammate 2 (no deps)
Task 3: tests → Teammate 1 (after Task 1)
Task 4: API docs → Teammate 2 (after Task 1)
Teammate 1 plans → Lead approves → implements Task 1
Teammate 2 plans → Lead approves → implements Task 2
Task 1 completes → unblocks Tasks 3 and 4
Teammate 1 picks up Task 3, Teammate 2 picks up Task 4
All complete → Lead runs integration tests → commits
https://code.claude.com/docs/agent-teams
documentation
Apply clear-writing standards to any prose the agent produces - READMEs, docs, UI copy, error messages, commit and PR text, release notes. Use when writing or editing documentation, interface copy, or any text a human will read. Says "write the README", "improve this copy", "draft the docs", "word this error".
development
Drive a change through a red-green-refactor loop - failing test first, minimal code to pass, then clean up. Use when implementing a feature or fixing a bug where correctness matters and a test can pin the behavior. Says "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write the test first".
tools
The index of every pro-workflow skill and command, grouped by job, with when to reach for each and whether it is human-run or auto-triggered. Use when you are not sure which skill fits, want the full map, or ask "what can this do", "which skill for X", "list the workflow".
development
Audit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.