skills/measure-experiment-design/SKILL.md
Designs an A/B test or experiment with variants, success metrics, sample size, and duration for an existing hypothesis. Use when planning an experiment to validate a product change or test an assumption you have already framed. To articulate the hypothesis itself first, use define-hypothesis.
npx skillsauth add product-on-purpose/pm-skills measure-experiment-designInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
An experiment design document defines all parameters needed to run a rigorous A/B test or controlled experiment. It ensures the team aligns on what you're testing, how you'll measure success, and how long to run the test before drawing conclusions. Good experiment design prevents common pitfalls: underpowered tests, unclear success criteria, and decisions based on noise rather than signal.
define-hypothesis first; this skill designs the test for a claim you already havemeasure-experiment-resultsmeasure-instrumentation-specmeasure-survey-analysisWhen asked to design an experiment, follow these steps:
Articulate the Hypothesis Write a clear, testable hypothesis in the format: "We believe [change] for [users] will [outcome] as measured by [metric]." One hypothesis per experiment - if you're testing multiple things, run multiple experiments.
Define the Variants Describe the control (current experience) and treatment (new experience) in sufficient detail. Include screenshots, mockups, or precise descriptions so anyone can understand what users will see.
Choose Primary and Secondary Metrics Select one primary metric that will determine success or failure. Add 2-3 secondary metrics to understand the broader impact. Include guardrail metrics to catch unintended negative effects.
Calculate Sample Size Determine how many users you need per variant to detect your minimum detectable effect (MDE) with statistical significance. Specify your significance level (typically 0.05) and power (typically 0.80).
Estimate Duration Based on sample size and available traffic, calculate how long the experiment needs to run. Account for weekly patterns - avoid ending mid-week if behavior varies by day.
Define Targeting and Allocation Specify which users are eligible for the experiment and how traffic is split between variants. Document any exclusions (e.g., employees, specific segments).
Set Success Criteria Define upfront what constitutes a win, a loss, or an inconclusive result. This prevents post-hoc rationalization and moving goalposts.
Document Risks and Mitigations Identify what could go wrong and how you'll detect/address it. Include monitoring plans and rollback criteria.
Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete design fills every template section: Overview; Hypothesis; Background; Variants; Metrics; Sample Size & Duration; Audience Targeting; Success Criteria; Risks & Mitigations; Implementation Notes; and References.
Before finalizing, verify:
See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.
tools
Guides a contributor from a workflow idea to a complete Workflow Implementation Packet (draft workflow file, draft workflow command, cross-cutting update checklist) in a staging area for review. Runs overlap analysis against the existing workflows with a Why Gate, then helps select and sequence skills with authored handoffs. Use when creating a new multi-skill workflow or promoting a repeated ad-hoc chain into a durable one. To build a single skill instead, use utility-pm-skill-builder; to run a sequence without authoring anything, use the chain command or utility-pm-workflow-orchestrator.
tools
Run an ordered sequence of pm-skills against one input, pausing for go/no-go and stopping on a failed or empty step. Accepts a saved prioritized action plan (Mode A) or an ad-hoc named chain (Mode B; the chain command routes here). Explicit invocation only; run --dry-run first while the native path is EXPERIMENTAL. To author a durable workflow instead, use utility-pm-workflow-builder.
tools
Run a repo-wide cross-cutting governance audit via the pm-skill-auditor sub-agent. Aggregates the enforcing validator suite, re-derives aggregate counters, and surfaces cross-cutting issues no single validator catches, graded P0/P1/P2/P3 with a machine-readable status. Use for pre-release readiness checks or a periodic repo health audit.
tools
Walk the guided 6-gate release runbook (G0 readiness, G1 adversarial review, G2 version bump and CHANGELOG, G2.5 commit and re-verify, G3 tag and push, G4 post-tag hygiene) via the pm-release-conductor sub-agent. Refuses gate bypasses and tags only the re-verified SHA. Use when cutting a pm-skills release.