skills/iterate-lessons-log/SKILL.md
Creates a structured lessons learned entry for organizational memory. Use after an incident, a completed project, or a significant learning to record knowledge for future teams and initiatives. Distinct from iterate-retrospective, which facilitates the team ceremony; this skill writes the durable lessons entry that outlives it.
npx skillsauth add product-on-purpose/pm-skills iterate-lessons-logInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A lessons log entry captures significant learning from projects, incidents, or experiences in a format that's useful to future teams who weren't there. Unlike retrospectives (which focus on team improvement), lessons logs focus on organizational knowledge that transcends individual teams.patterns, anti-patterns, and hard-won wisdom.
iterate-retrospective; this skill banks the durable entry that outlives ititerate-pivot-decisionmeasure-experiment-results first, then bank the transferable lesson herefoundation-stakeholder-updateWhen asked to create a lessons log entry, follow these steps:
Choose a Descriptive Title Write a title that someone searching for this topic would find. Include keywords that describe the situation and the learning. Avoid generic titles like "Project X lessons."
Provide Context Explain the situation fully enough that someone who wasn't there can understand it. Include the project, timeline, team, and any relevant constraints. Future readers need this context to assess applicability.
Describe What Happened Write a factual account of what occurred. Be specific about actions taken, decisions made, and outcomes observed. Avoid blame.focus on events and systems.
Extract the Lesson Articulate what you learned clearly. The lesson should be actionable.something others can apply. Distinguish between what you observed and your interpretation of why it matters.
Formulate Recommendations Provide specific guidance for future teams facing similar situations. What should they do? What should they avoid? What questions should they ask?
Define Applicability Help readers know when this lesson applies. What situations trigger relevance? What context makes it more or less applicable?
Add Tags for Searchability Include keywords and categories that will help future searchers find this entry. Think about what someone would search for when facing a similar situation.
Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete entry fills every template section: Metadata; Summary; Context; What Happened; The Lesson; Recommendations; Applicability; Supporting Evidence; Tags and Categories; and Review and Updates.
Before finalizing, verify:
See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.
tools
Guides a contributor from a workflow idea to a complete Workflow Implementation Packet (draft workflow file, draft workflow command, cross-cutting update checklist) in a staging area for review. Runs overlap analysis against the existing workflows with a Why Gate, then helps select and sequence skills with authored handoffs. Use when creating a new multi-skill workflow or promoting a repeated ad-hoc chain into a durable one. To build a single skill instead, use utility-pm-skill-builder; to run a sequence without authoring anything, use the chain command or utility-pm-workflow-orchestrator.
tools
Run an ordered sequence of pm-skills against one input, pausing for go/no-go and stopping on a failed or empty step. Accepts a saved prioritized action plan (Mode A) or an ad-hoc named chain (Mode B; the chain command routes here). Explicit invocation only; run --dry-run first while the native path is EXPERIMENTAL. To author a durable workflow instead, use utility-pm-workflow-builder.
tools
Run a repo-wide cross-cutting governance audit via the pm-skill-auditor sub-agent. Aggregates the enforcing validator suite, re-derives aggregate counters, and surfaces cross-cutting issues no single validator catches, graded P0/P1/P2/P3 with a machine-readable status. Use for pre-release readiness checks or a periodic repo health audit.
tools
Walk the guided 6-gate release runbook (G0 readiness, G1 adversarial review, G2 version bump and CHANGELOG, G2.5 commit and re-verify, G3 tag and push, G4 post-tag hygiene) via the pm-release-conductor sub-agent. Refuses gate bypasses and tags only the re-verified SHA. Use when cutting a pm-skills release.