skills/develop-design-rationale/SKILL.md
Documents the reasoning behind design decisions including alternatives considered, trade-offs evaluated, and principles applied. Use when making significant UX decisions, aligning with stakeholders on design direction, or preserving design context for future reference.
npx skillsauth add product-on-purpose/pm-skills develop-design-rationaleInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A design rationale document captures the "why" behind design decisions.the context, constraints, alternatives considered, and reasoning that led to a particular solution. While designs themselves show what was built, rationale documents preserve institutional knowledge about why it was built that way.
When asked to document design rationale, follow these steps:
State the Decision Begin with a clear, one-sentence summary of what design decision was made. This becomes the title and reference point for the document.
Describe the Context Explain the situation that prompted this decision. What problem were you solving? What constraints existed? What user needs informed the direction? Include relevant research findings.
List Options Considered Document at least 2-3 alternatives that were evaluated. For each option, describe what it would look like and its key characteristics. Be fair to all options.avoid strawmen.
Define Evaluation Criteria Specify how options were assessed: usability heuristics, technical feasibility, brand alignment, user research findings, business requirements, or design principles.
Explain the Reasoning Walk through why the chosen option best meets the criteria. Be explicit about trade-offs.what you gained and what you sacrificed. Acknowledge where the decision is reversible vs. irreversible.
Document Trade-offs Accepted Every design decision involves trade-offs. Name what you gave up and why it was acceptable. This honesty helps future teams understand constraints.
Note Follow-up Considerations Capture anything that needs attention later: metrics to watch, conditions that might warrant revisiting the decision, or related decisions to make.
Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output.
Before finalizing, verify:
See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.
tools
Run an ordered sequence of pm-skills against one input via the pm-workflow-orchestrator sub-agent, pausing for go/no-go and stopping on a failed or empty step. Dispatches natively on Claude Code with the pm-skills plugin (invokes @agent-pm-skills:pm-workflow-orchestrator, which delegates each step through the Skill tool); on non-Claude clients (Codex CLI, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, Gemini CLI) reads agents/pm-workflow-orchestrator.md and walks the loop inline after a tool-capability pre-flight. Explicit invocation only; never fires proactively. EXPERIMENTAL on all non-Claude clients and on the native path until smoke-tested; run --dry-run first.
development
Produce a comprehensive, evidence-grounded prioritized action plan from any PM input (notes, transcripts, drafts, executive asks, Slack threads, or a raw situation). Outputs one saveable document with an executive summary, input mirror, situation classification (Cynefin), the binding constraint (Theory of Constraints), prioritized questions and open decisions, a ranked action plan with the critical effort plus follow-ons, risks and pre-mortem, copy/paste prompts for downstream pm-skills, and an evidence map. Builds a source ledger and cites exact input quotes; refuses High-confidence plans for Complex or Chaotic situations. Use when you want the critical next effort and how to execute it.
testing
--- name: deliver-y phase: deliver --- # Deliver Y Fixture skill for phase-map and phase-router tests.
testing
--- name: define-x phase: define --- # Define X Fixture skill for phase-map and phase-router tests.