skills/panel-review/SKILL.md
Multi-reviewer panel on N focused questions about a near-final artifact (plan, design, code, prose). R0 (you) plus two parallel reviewer subagents, per-question table with disagreement preserved, walk decisions one at a time. TRIGGER when: user says 'panel review', 'multi-agent review'; user has a mostly-done artifact and focused micro-decisions to validate. SKIP when: only one proposal under review — use `second-opinion`.
npx skillsauth add preetamnath/agent-skills panel-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Three parallel reads on N focused questions, with disagreement preserved.
general-purpose subagents in parallel).AskUserQuestion first.second-opinion on the highest-confidence reviewer's pick and raise Max to the synthesized score if higher.| # | Question | R0 | R1 | R2 | Max |
AskUserQuestion to confirm the walk order before walking.Queue rule: drop later questions invalidated by an approved decision, with a one-line reason.
For each question:
AskUserQuestion with options: apply / alternative / defer. Apply if actionable; otherwise record.
second-opinion on the challenged pick.List all observations. Walk those with confidence ≥ 0.70 using Step 3's sub-procedure (skip R0/R1/R2 split).
One line each:
documentation
Collapse a multi-clause instruction into one positive line of trigger + action. TRIGGER when: user says 'tighten this rule', 'make this leaner', 'make this simpler' in a skill, CLAUDE.md, agent prompt, or style guide.
documentation
File-level tightening pass on an instruction file (CLAUDE.md, skill, agent prompt, style guide) using `tighten-instruction` as the lens. TRIGGER when: user says 'tighten/simplify this file/skill/CLAUDE.md', 'cut this down'; user points at a verbose instruction file and wants it leaner.
testing
Anchored second-opinion on one concrete proposal: dispatch a subagent to rate the fix, generate ranked alternatives, and flag blind spots, then synthesize back. TRIGGER when: user says 'second opinion', 'rate my fix', 'weigh in on my approach', 'what alternatives am I missing', or wants their candidate edit/decision evaluated against alternatives. SKIP when: multiple decisions on a larger artifact — use `panel-review`.
testing
Explain how a feature, flow, or concept works by grounding in source-of-truth and walking top-down with diagrams. TRIGGER when: user says explain/walk me through/ELI5/help me understand; user wants to understand how a feature, flow, or system works; user wants intuition or first principles. SKIP when: user wants a diagnosis/fix/action; user wants a one-line definition they can already apply; quick spot-check or confirmation.