skills/exploring-llm-traces/SKILL.md
ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.
npx skillsauth add posthog/ai-plugin exploring-llm-tracesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
PostHog captures LLM/AI agent activity as traces. Each trace is a tree of events representing a single AI interaction — from the top-level agent invocation down to individual LLM API calls.
| Tool | Purpose |
| ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| posthog:query-llm-traces-list | Search and list traces; can return large multi-trace payloads |
| posthog:query-llm-trace | Get a single trace by ID with full event tree |
| posthog:read-data-schema | Discover custom event/person properties before filtering |
| posthog:execute-sql | Ad-hoc SQL for complex trace analysis |
See the event reference for the full schema.
$ai_trace (top-level container)
└── $ai_span (logical groupings, e.g. "RAG retrieval", "tool execution")
├── $ai_generation (individual LLM API call)
└── $ai_embedding (embedding creation)
Events are linked via $ai_parent_id → parent's $ai_span_id or $ai_trace_id.
First inspect the path. Do not treat every UUID-looking value as a trace ID.
/ai-observability/traces/<trace_id> or legacy /llm-analytics/traces/<trace_id> / /llm-observability/traces/<trace_id> is a single trace. Fetch it with posthog:query-llm-trace./ai-observability/sessions/<session_id> or legacy /llm-analytics/sessions/<session_id> is an AI session, not a trace. Fetch traces with posthog:query-llm-traces-list filtered by event property $ai_session_id.Preserve date_from / date_to query parameters from the URL when present.
If none are present but the URL has a timestamp query parameter, use that timestamp as the anchor and query an absolute window around it, for example timestamp - 36h to timestamp + 36h.
This handles exact session links whose UI timestamp may be offset from the stored event timestamps while keeping the query bounded.
If the URL has neither explicit dates nor timestamp, use a safe default like {"date_from": "-7d"}.
For exact trace and session URLs, skip schema discovery for the standard $ai_* fields used below. These are AI observability built-ins, not project-specific custom properties.
For a trace URL, call posthog:query-llm-trace with:
{
"traceId": "<trace_id>",
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-7d" }
}
For a session URL, call posthog:query-llm-traces-list with:
{
"dateRange": { "date_from": "<timestamp_minus_36h>", "date_to": "<timestamp_plus_36h>" },
"filterTestAccounts": false,
"limit": 20,
"properties": [{ "type": "event", "key": "$ai_session_id", "value": ["<session_id>"], "operator": "exact" }]
}
Use the URL's date_from / date_to values in the session query if present.
If the URL only has timestamp, calculate the absolute date range from that timestamp instead of using a relative range like -1h.
Set filterTestAccounts: false for an exact URL so the requested trace is not hidden by account filters.
The result contains the event tree with all properties. The response may be large — when it exceeds the inline limit, Claude Code auto-persists it to a file.
From the result you get:
$ai_span, $ai_generation, etc.)$ai_span_name) — these are the tool/step names$ai_parent_id_posthogUrl — always include this in your response so the user can click through to the UIWhen the result is persisted to a file (large traces with full $ai_input/$ai_output_choices),
use the parsing scripts to explore it.
Start with the summary to get the full picture, then drill into specifics:
# 1. Overview: metadata, tool calls, final output, errors
python3 scripts/print_summary.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 2. Timeline: chronological event list with truncated I/O
python3 scripts/print_timeline.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 3. Drill into a specific span's full input/output
SPAN="tool_name" python3 scripts/extract_span.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 4. Full conversation with thinking blocks and tool calls
python3 scripts/extract_conversation.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
# 5. Search for a keyword across all properties
SEARCH="keyword" python3 scripts/search_traces.py /path/to/persisted-file.json
All scripts support MAX_LEN=N env var to control truncation (0 = unlimited).
$ai_span for the tool call (look at $ai_span_name)$ai_input_state — what arguments were passed to the tool?$ai_output_state — what did the tool return?$ai_is_error — did the tool call fail?$ai_generation event where the LLM made the decision$ai_input — this is the full message history the LLM saw$ai_span events for retrieval/search steps$ai_output_state — what content was retrieved and fed to the LLM?$ai_parent_id)$ai_output_state and $ai_is_error$ai_generation events, those are the subagent's LLM callssearch_traces.py to find where the text appears: SEARCH="the text" python3 scripts/search_traces.py FILE$ai_input of that generation to see what the LLM was told before it said XThe trace tools return _posthogUrl — always surface this to the user.
You can also construct links manually:
https://app.posthog.com/ai-observability/traces/<trace_id>?timestamp=<url_encoded_timestamp>&event=<optional_event_id>_posthogUrl from query-llm-traces-listThe timestamp query param is required — use the createdAt of the earliest event in the trace, URL-encoded (e.g. timestamp=2026-04-01T19%3A39%3A20Z).
When presenting findings, always include the relevant PostHog URL so the user can verify.
Use posthog:query-llm-traces-list to search and filter traces.
CRITICAL: Never assume event names, property names, or property values from training data.
Every project instruments different custom properties. For open-ended searches and custom filters, call
posthog:read-data-schema first to discover what properties and values actually exist in the project's
data before constructing filters.
The exception is exact AI observability trace/session URLs: use the built-in $ai_trace_id / $ai_session_id
fields directly and skip schema discovery.
Before filtering traces, discover what's available:
posthog:read-data-schema with kind: "events" and look for $ai_* eventsposthog:read-data-schema with kind: "event_properties" and event_name: "$ai_generation" (or another AI event) to see what properties are capturedposthog:read-data-schema with kind: "event_property_values", event_name: "$ai_generation", and property_name: "$ai_model" to see real model names in useOnly then construct the query-llm-traces-list call with property filters.
This is especially important for custom properties like project_id, conversation_id, user_tier, etc. — these vary per project and cannot be guessed.
Do not confirm $ai_* properties, but confirm any other like email of a person.
posthog:query-llm-traces-list
{
"dateRange": {"date_from": "-1h"},
"filterTestAccounts": true,
"limit": 20,
"properties": [
{"type": "event", "key": "$ai_model", "value": "gpt-4o", "operator": "exact"}
]
}
Multiple filters are AND-ed together:
posthog:query-llm-traces-list
{
"dateRange": {"date_from": "-1h"},
"filterTestAccounts": true,
"properties": [
{"type": "event", "key": "$ai_provider", "value": "anthropic", "operator": "exact"},
{"type": "event", "key": "$ai_is_error", "value": ["true"], "operator": "exact"}
]
}
You can also filter by person properties (discover them via read-data-schema with kind: "entity_properties" and entity: "person"):
posthog:query-llm-traces-list
{
"dateRange": {"date_from": "-1h"},
"filterTestAccounts": true,
"properties": [
{"type": "person", "key": "email", "value": "@company.com", "operator": "icontains"}
]
}
Customers often store their own IDs as event or person properties.
Use posthog:read-data-schema to discover what custom properties exist, then filter:
posthog:read-data-schema with kind: "event_properties" and event_name: "$ai_trace" to find custom propertiesposthog:query-llm-traces-list
{
"dateRange": {"date_from": "-7d"},
"properties": [
{"type": "event", "key": "project_id", "value": "proj_abc123", "operator": "exact"}
]
}
For more complex SQL patterns, read these references:
TraceQuery HogQL)Trace tool results are JSON. When too large to read inline, Claude Code persists them to a file.
[{ "type": "text", "text": "{\"results\": [...], \"_posthogUrl\": \"...\"}" }]
results (array for list, object for single trace)
├── id, traceName, createdAt, totalLatency, totalCost
├── inputState, outputState (trace-level state)
└── events[]
├── event ($ai_span | $ai_generation | $ai_embedding | $ai_metric | $ai_feedback)
├── id, createdAt
└── properties
├── $ai_span_name, $ai_latency, $ai_is_error
├── $ai_input_state, $ai_output_state (span tool I/O)
├── $ai_input, $ai_output_choices (generation messages)
├── $ai_model, $ai_provider
└── $ai_input_tokens, $ai_output_tokens, $ai_total_cost_usd
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
| -------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| print_summary.py | Aggregate list/session totals, trace metadata, tool calls, errors, and final LLM output | python3 scripts/print_summary.py FILE |
| print_timeline.py | Chronological event timeline with I/O summaries | python3 scripts/print_timeline.py FILE |
| extract_span.py | Full input/output of a specific span by name | SPAN="name" python3 scripts/extract_span.py FILE |
| extract_conversation.py | LLM messages with thinking blocks and tool calls | python3 scripts/extract_conversation.py FILE |
| search_traces.py | Find a keyword across all event properties | SEARCH="keyword" python3 scripts/search_traces.py FILE |
| show_structure.py | Show JSON keys and types without values | cat blob.json \| python3 scripts/show_structure.py |
dateRange — queries without a time range are slow. Use narrow windows (-30m, -1h) for broad listing queries; wider windows (-7d, -30d) are fine for narrow queries filtered by trace ID or specific property values_posthogUrl in your response so the user can click through$ai_input_state / $ai_output_state on spans contain tool call inputs and outputs$ai_input / $ai_output_choices on generations contain the full LLM conversation — can be megabytes; when the result is persisted to a file, use the parsing scripts$ai_input / $ai_output / $ai_output_choices / $ai_input_state / $ai_output_state / $ai_tools) lives only on the posthog.ai_events table, not events.properties — see the event reference for the column mapping and trace-id-anchored query patternsfilterTestAccounts: true to exclude internal/test traffic when searching$ai_trace events are NOT in the events array — their data is surfaced via trace-level inputState, outputState, and traceNamedata-ai
Signals scout for PostHog Tasks, the agent work items a project runs. Two lenses: delivery health (runs failing, clustered by repository and error class, and retry storms) every run, and on a slower rotation demand (recurring asks across human-authored tasks that point at a product gap). Skips the scout fleet's own run rows.
devops
Signals scout for the PostHog Conversations (support inbox) product. Watches the `$conversation_*` ticket-lifecycle events for support-delivery regressions — SLA breach-rate steps, first-response latency blowouts, backlog inflow-vs-resolution imbalance, and channel / assignment concentration — and files each dated regression as a report. Complements the per-ticket product-feedback signals the emission pipeline already fires; does not re-surface individual ticket content.
development
Populates and maintains a project's data catalog (semantic layer): canonical metrics, trust marks (certifications) on warehouse tables/views, and reviewed table relationships. Use when asked to set up / seed / bootstrap the data catalog or semantic layer, to catalog a project's metrics, to certify or deprecate data sources, to propose or review table joins, or to work through the proposal review queue. To *use* an existing catalog to answer a business-number question, see querying-posthog-data instead. Trigger terms: data catalog, semantic layer, canonical metric, certify table, deprecate source, relationship proposal, metric drift, review queue.
tools
Investigate logs in a PostHog project: verify a service or deployment is healthy, explain an error spike, triage an incident, or understand what a log stream is saying. Use when the user asks to "check the logs", asks whether a service, deploy, release, or change is working or broke anything, asks why errors are up or what changed, or wants the root cause of failures visible in logs. Routes the logs MCP tools (services overview, pattern mining, before/after pattern diffing, bucketed counts, facets, raw rows) so investigations start from summaries instead of raw rows or hand-written SQL over the logs table.