i18n/de/skills/ornament-style-color/SKILL.md
Entwerfen polychromatic ornamental patterns grounded in Alexander Speltz's classical ornament taxonomy. Builds on monochrome structural analysis by adding period-authentic color palettes, color-to-motif mapping, and rendering styles suited to painted, illuminated, and glazed ornament. Verwenden wenn creating decorative designs where color is integral to the tradition (Islamic tilework, illuminated manuscripts, Art Nouveau), exploring how historical periods used color in ornament, or producing colored reference imagery for design, illustration, or educational materials.
npx skillsauth add pjt222/agent-almanac ornament-style-colorInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Entwerfen polychromatic ornamental patterns by combining art historical color knowledge with AI-assisted image generation. Builds on the structural foundation of ornament-style-mono by adding period-authentic color palettes, color harmony principles, and rendering styles suited to painted, illuminated, and glazed ornament.
Waehlen a period and identify its characteristic color language. Color in ornament is never arbitrary — each period has a palette rooted in available pigments, cultural symbolism, and material context.
Historical Ornament Periods with Characteristic Palettes:
┌───────────────────┬─────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Period │ Date Range │ Characteristic Palette │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Egyptian │ 3100–332 BCE │ Lapis blue, gold/ochre, terracotta red, black, white │
│ │ │ Mineral pigments: flat, unmodulated, high contrast │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Greek │ 800–31 BCE │ Terracotta red, black, ochre, white, blue (rare) │
│ │ │ Pottery palette; architectural color largely lost │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Roman │ 509 BCE–476 CE │ Pompeii red, ochre yellow, black, white, verdigris │
│ │ │ Fresco palette: warm earth tones, strong red dominant │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Byzantine │ 330–1453 CE │ Gold (dominant), deep blue, crimson, purple, white │
│ │ │ Mosaic tesserae: jewel tones, gold ground, luminous │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Islamic │ 7th–17th c. │ Turquoise/cobalt blue, white, gold, emerald green │
│ │ │ Tile glazes: luminous, saturated, geometric precision │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Romanesque │ 1000–1200 CE │ Ochre, rust red, deep green, dark blue, cream │
│ │ │ Manuscript and stone: earthy, muted, mineral-derived │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Gothic │ 1150–1500 CE │ Ultramarine blue, ruby red, emerald green, gold, white │
│ │ │ Stained glass + illumination: saturated, luminous │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Renaissance │ 1400–1600 CE │ Rich earth tones, azure blue, gold leaf, warm greens │
│ │ │ Oil and fresco: naturalistic, modulated, subtle │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Baroque/Rococo │ 1600–1780 CE │ Pastel pink, powder blue, cream, gold, soft green │
│ │ │ (Rococo) vs deep burgundy, gold, forest green (Baroque) │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Art Nouveau │ 1890–1910 CE │ Sage green, dusty rose, amber/gold, muted purple, │
│ │ │ teal. Organic, muted, nature-derived palette │
└───────────────────┴─────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Erwartet: A clearly identified period with its characteristic palette and material context understood.
Bei Fehler: If der Benutzer requests a period not in the table, research its color language using WebSuchen for "[period] ornament color palette pigments" and construct an equivalent entry. Historical pigment availability is a reliable guide to period-authentic color.
Translate the historical palette into a specific 3-5 color set with defined roles.
Color Role Framework:
Color Distribution (60/30/10 Rule):
┌──────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Role │ Proportion │ Function │
├──────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Dominant │ ~60% │ Ground color or primary structural color │
│ Secondary │ ~30% │ Motif fill or supporting structural color │
│ Accent │ ~10% │ Highlights, details, focal points │
│ (Optional) │ — │ Additional accent or metallic (gold) │
│ (Optional) │ — │ Background / ground if different from │
│ │ │ dominant │
└──────────────┴────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────┘
Color Harmony Approaches:
Example Palette Definitions:
Erwartet: A palette of 3-5 named colors with roles, proportions, harmony approach, and mood defined.
Bei Fehler: If color selection feels arbitrary, anchor to the period's material context. Ask: "What pigments were physically available?" and "What was the ground material?" (gold leaf on vellum, glaze on ceramic, paint on plaster). The material constrains and authenticates the palette.
Understand the structural grammar of the chosen motif, extending the monochrome analysis with color-to-structure mapping.
Perform the same structural analysis as ornament-style-mono Step 2:
Hinzufuegen color-to-structure mapping:
Example Mapping:
Islamic Star Pattern:
- Star forms: turquoise (dominant)
- Interlocking geometric ground: white (secondary)
- Star center details: cobalt blue (accent)
- Outline/border: gold (detail)
→ Color follows form strictly — each geometric shape is one flat color
Erwartet: A structural description with explicit color assignments fuer jede structural element.
Bei Fehler: If the color-to-structure mapping is unclear, study historical examples using WebSuchen for "[period] [motif] ornament color" and observe how color was actually used. Historical ornament almost always uses color to clarify structure, not obscure it.
Erstellen the text prompt for Z-Image generation, incorporating color palette and rendering style.
Prompt Template:
[Rendering style] of [motif name] ornament in the [period] style,
[composition type], [color palette description],
[color mood], [structural details from Step 3],
[application context], [additional qualifiers]
Color-Appropriate Rendering Styles:
painted ornament — brushwork visible, opaque colors, fresco or oil qualityilluminated manuscript — gold leaf, rich jewel tones, vellum groundglazed ceramic tile — glossy surface, flat color, precise edgesstained glass — translucent color, dark leading lines zwischen shapeswatercolor illustration — transparent washes, soft edges, paper visibleenamel on metal — hard glossy color, metallic groundmosaic — small tesserae, visible gaps zwischen pieces, luminousprinted poster — flat color areas, Art Nouveau or Arts & Crafts qualityColor Description in Prompts:
Example Prompts:
glazed ceramic tile ornament in the Islamic style, geometric star pattern, turquoise blue and white with cobalt blue accents and gold outlines, vivid saturated colors, repeating tessellation, Iznik tilework qualityilluminated manuscript border in the Gothic style, vine and trefoil ornament, ultramarine blue and ruby red with gold leaf details on cream vellum, rich jewel tones, vertical panel, medieval book of hours qualitywatercolor illustration of Art Nouveau floral ornament, whiplash curves with lily motif, sage green and dusty rose with amber gold accents, muted organic tones, vertical panel, Alphonse Mucha influenceErwartet: A prompt of 25-50 words that specifies rendering style, motif, period, composition, and explicit color information.
Bei Fehler: If the prompt produces color that nicht match the palette, front-load the color description in the prompt (put it vor the motif description). Z-Image weights earlier prompt tokens more heavily. Also try naming specific hex colors or well-known pigment names (ultramarine, vermillion, ochre).
Auswaehlen resolution and generation parameters. Color ornament often benefits from slightly more inference steps than monochrome.
Resolution by Application (same as ornament-style-mono):
┌────────────────────┬─────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┐
│ Application │ Recommended │ Rationale │
├────────────────────┼─────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────┤
│ Medallion / Roundel│ 1024x1024 (1:1) │ Radial symmetry needs square │
│ Tile / Repeat Unit │ 1024x1024 (1:1) │ Square for seamless tiling │
│ Horizontal Frieze │ 1280x720 (16:9) │ Wide format for running border │
│ Vertical Panel │ 720x1280 (9:16) │ Portrait format for columns │
│ Wide Border │ 1344x576 (21:9) │ Ultrawide for architectural │
│ General / Flexible │ 1152x896 (9:7) │ Balanced landscape format │
│ Large Detail │ 1536x1536 (1:1) │ Higher res for fine color work │
└────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────┘
steps to 10-12 for color work (color detail and palette accuracy benefit from more steps)shift to 3 (default)random_seed: true for exploration or random_seed: false with a specific seed for reproducibilityErwartet: A complete parameter set. Beachte, dass color ornament generally needs 10+ steps for good palette fidelity.
Bei Fehler: If unsure, use 1024x1024 at 10 steps. This is a reliable default for most color ornament contexts.
Aufrufen the Z-Image MCP tool to produce the ornament.
mcp__hf-mcp-server__gr1_z_image_turbo_generate with:
prompt: the constructed prompt from Step 4resolution: from Step 5steps: from Step 5 (recommend 10-12)shift: from Step 5random_seed: from Step 5seed: specific seed if random_seed is falseErwartet: A generated image with recognizable ornamental forms and visible color. The color may not perfectly match the specified palette — this is addressed in evaluation.
Bei Fehler: If the MCP tool is unavailable, verify that hf-mcp-server is configured (see configure-mcp-server or troubleshoot-mcp-connection). If the generated image is entirely abstract, the prompt needs more specific structural language — return to Step 4. If colors are vollstaendig wrong, front-load the color names in the prompt.
Bewerten the generated image gegen five criteria, extending the monochrome rubric with color-specific evaluation.
Polychromatic Ornament Evaluation Rubric:
┌─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Criterion │ Evaluation Questions │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Palette Match │ Do the colors in the image approximate the specified │
│ │ palette? Are the named colors present? Are there │
│ │ unwanted colors that break the palette? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2. Color │ Does the color distribution roughly follow the │
│ Distribution │ 60/30/10 allocation? Is the dominant color actually │
│ │ dominant? Does the accent appear sparingly? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3. Rendering Style │ Does the image look like the specified rendering │
│ │ style? Does a "glazed tile" look glossy and flat? │
│ │ Does "illuminated manuscript" show gold and vellum? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 4. Period Accuracy │ Would this design be recognizable as belonging to │
│ │ the specified period? Are motifs period-appropriate? │
│ │ Does the color usage match period conventions? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5. Form-Color │ Does color clarify the ornamental structure or │
│ Balance │ obscure it? Can you "read" the motifs through the │
│ │ color? Does color follow form as intended? │
└─────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Erwartet: A scored evaluation with specific observations. Color ornament is harder to control than monochrome — expect Adequate scores on first generation for palette match and distribution.
Bei Fehler: If most criteria score Weak, the prompt may need fundamental restructuring. Common fixes: move color names to the very beginning of the prompt, use fewer colors, specify the ground color explicitly, increase steps to 12.
Verfeinern the design durch targeted iteration or accept das Ergebnis.
Color-Specific Iteration Strategies:
Iteration Budget: Begrenzen to 3 iterations per design concept. Color iteration often requires more prompt adjustment than monochrome.
Erwartet: Improved color fidelity nach 1-2 iterations. Perfect palette match is unlikely — aim for "recognizably in the right color family."
Bei Fehler: If iteration ist nicht converging, the color palette kann too specific for das Modell to reproduce reliably. Simplify to fewer colors (3 stattdessen of 5), use broader color descriptions ("warm earth tones" stattdessen of specific hex values), or accept the closest approximation.
Erstellen a complete record of the final design for reproducibility and reference.
Erwartet: A reproducible record with full color documentation einschliesslich hex approximations and palette analysis.
Bei Fehler: If full documentation feels excessive, at minimum record the final prompt, seed, and a list of intended vs. actual colors. These allow reproduction and palette adjustment in future iterations.
ornament-style-monoornament-style-mono — the monochrome foundation skill; always available as a fallback when color ist nicht cooperating, and recommended as a first step for understanding motif structure vor adding colorreview-web-design — color theory principles (contrast, harmony, rhythm) apply directly to ornamental color compositionmeditate — focused attention and color visualization practices can inform palette developmenttesting
Launch all available agents in parallel waves for open-ended hypothesis generation on problems where the correct domain is unknown. Use when facing a cross-domain problem with no clear starting point, when single-agent approaches have stalled, or when diverse perspectives are more valuable than deep expertise. Produces a ranked hypothesis set with convergence analysis and adversarial refinement.
tools
Write integration tests for a Node.js CLI application using the built-in node:test module. Covers the exec helper pattern, output assertions, filesystem state verification, cleanup hooks, JSON output parsing, error case testing, and state restoration after destructive tests. Use when adding tests to an existing CLI, testing a new command, verifying adapter behavior across frameworks, or setting up CI for a CLI tool.
development
Screen a proposed trademark for conflicts and distinctiveness before filing. Covers trademark database searches (TMview, WIPO Global Brand Database, USPTO TESS), distinctiveness analysis using the Abercrombie spectrum, likelihood of confusion assessment using DuPont factors and EUIPO relative grounds, common law rights evaluation, and goods/services overlap analysis. Produces a conflict report with a risk matrix. Use before adopting a new brand name, logo, or slogan — distinct from patent prior art search, which uses different databases, legal frameworks, and analysis methods.
tools
Scaffold a new CLI command using Commander.js with options, action handler, three output modes (human-readable, quiet, JSON), and optional ceremony variant. Covers command naming, option design, shared context patterns, error handling, and integration testing. Use when adding a command to an existing Commander.js CLI, designing a new CLI tool from scratch, or standardizing command structure across a multi-command CLI.