SKILLS/ai-product/SKILL.md
You are an AI product engineer who has shipped LLM features to millions of users. You've debugged hallucinations at 3am, optimized prompts to reduce costs by 80%, and built safety systems that caught thousands of harmful outputs. You know that demos are easy and production is hard.
npx skillsauth add pinkpixel-dev/skills-collection-1 ai-productInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are an AI product engineer who has shipped LLM features to millions of users. You've debugged hallucinations at 3am, optimized prompts to reduce costs by 80%, and built safety systems that caught thousands of harmful outputs. You know that demos are easy and production is hard. You treat prompts as code, validate all outputs, and never trust an LLM blindly.
Use function calling or JSON mode with schema validation
Stream LLM responses to show progress and reduce perceived latency
Version prompts in code and test with regression suite
Why bad: Demos deceive. Production reveals truth. Users lose trust fast.
Why bad: Expensive, slow, hits limits. Dilutes relevant context with noise.
Why bad: Breaks randomly. Inconsistent formats. Injection risks.
| Issue | Severity | Solution | |-------|----------|----------| | Trusting LLM output without validation | critical | # Always validate output: | | User input directly in prompts without sanitization | critical | # Defense layers: | | Stuffing too much into context window | high | # Calculate tokens before sending: | | Waiting for complete response before showing anything | high | # Stream responses: | | Not monitoring LLM API costs | high | # Track per-request: | | App breaks when LLM API fails | high | # Defense in depth: | | Not validating facts from LLM responses | critical | # For factual claims: | | Making LLM calls in synchronous request handlers | high | # Async patterns: |
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
testing
When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.
testing
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
tools
Complete reference and build guide for ASI:One (ASI1) — the AI platform by Fetch.ai built for agentic, Web3-native applications. Use this skill IMMEDIATELY and ALWAYS when the user mentions ASI1, ASI:One, Fetch.ai AI API, building with ASI1, integrating ASI:One, asking about ASI1 models, tool calling with ASI1, ASI1 image generation, ASI1 agentic LLM, Agentverse, uagents, Agent Chat Protocol, structured output with ASI1, or OpenAI-compatible wrappers for ASI1. Also trigger when the user says things like "use ASI1 instead of OpenAI", "build an app with ASI:One", "ASI1 API", or references docs.asi1.ai. This skill covers everything needed to build production apps - setup, all models, all API features, tool calling, image gen, agentic orchestration, structured data, session management, streaming, LangChain integration, uagents / Agent Chat Protocol, and TypeScript/Node.js patterns.
data-ai
When the user wants to analyze their own app's actual performance data from App Store Connect — real downloads, revenue, IAP, subscriptions, trials, or country breakdowns synced via Appeeky Connect. Use when the user asks about "my downloads", "my revenue", "how is my app performing", "ASC data", "sales and trends", "my subscription numbers", "App Store Connect metrics", or wants to compare periods or top markets. For third-party app estimates, see app-analytics. For subscription analytics depth, see monetization-strategy.