pm-product-strategy/skills/pricing-strategy/SKILL.md
Analyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and price elasticity. Use when setting prices, evaluating pricing models, preparing for a pricing change, or comparing freemium vs paid approaches.
npx skillsauth add phuryn/pm-skills pricing-strategyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Design a pricing strategy grounded in value delivery, competitive positioning, and willingness to pay.
You are developing a pricing strategy for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (competitor pricing, survey data, financial models, or usage data), read them first. Use web search to research competitor pricing if needed.
Understand the value delivered:
Evaluate pricing models — recommend the best fit:
| Model | Best For | Example | |---|---|---| | Flat-rate | Simple products, predictable costs | Basecamp ($99/mo flat) | | Per-seat | Collaboration tools, team products | Slack, Figma | | Usage-based | Infrastructure, API products | AWS, Twilio | | Tiered | Products with distinct user segments | Most SaaS (Free/Pro/Enterprise) | | Freemium | Products with viral/network effects | Spotify, Notion | | Freemium + usage | Platform products | Vercel, OpenAI API | | Value-based | High-impact enterprise tools | Salesforce, Palantir |
Analyze competitive pricing:
Design the pricing structure:
Estimate price sensitivity:
Plan pricing experiments:
Output a pricing recommendation:
Recommended Model: [Model type]
Value Metric: [What you charge on]
| Tier | Price | Target Segment | Key Features | Positioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Key Assumptions:
- [Assumption] → [How to test]
Risks:
- [Risk] → [Mitigation]
Think step by step. Save as markdown. Flag any assumptions that need validation before launch.
testing
Red-team a PRD, roadmap, or strategy by attacking its load-bearing assumptions before reality does. Steelmans then attacks each claim, ranks failure modes by impact × likelihood × cheapness-to-test, and returns the cheapest test and kill criteria for each. Use when stress-testing a plan, pressure-testing a strategy, challenging assumptions, or preparing a doc for executive review.
tools
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
development
The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.
testing
Comprehensive PM resume review and tailoring against 10 best practices including XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, job-specific tailoring, and structure. Use when reviewing a PM resume, preparing for job applications, or improving resume impact.