pm-go-to-market/skills/competitive-battlecard/SKILL.md
Create sales-ready competitive battlecards comparing your product against a specific competitor — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win/loss patterns. Use when preparing sales teams, creating competitive materials, or responding to 'why not competitor X?'
npx skillsauth add phuryn/pm-skills competitive-battlecardInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Create a concise, sales-ready battlecard for use against a specific competitor.
You are creating a competitive battlecard for $ARGUMENTS.
Use web search to research the competitor's current product, pricing, positioning, and recent changes. If the user provides files (feature lists, win/loss data, sales call notes), read them first.
Research the competitor (use web search):
Create the battlecard with these sections:
| Capability | Us | Them | Winner | |---|---|---|---| | [Feature area 1] | [Our approach] | [Their approach] | [Us/Them/Tie] | | [Feature area 2] | ... | ... | ... | | Pricing | ... | ... | ... | | Support | ... | ... | ... |
| Prospect Says | Respond With | |---|---| | "Competitor X has [feature]" | "[Our alternative approach and why it's better for them]" | | "They're cheaper" | "[Value framing: total cost of ownership, ROI, hidden costs]" | | "They're more established" | "[Our advantages: speed, innovation, focus, support]" |
Questions to ask the prospect that highlight competitor weaknesses:
Keep it scannable: Sales reps need to reference this during calls. Use tables, bold text, and short bullets.
Save as markdown. Format for easy printing or sharing in Notion/Confluence.
testing
Red-team a PRD, roadmap, or strategy by attacking its load-bearing assumptions before reality does. Steelmans then attacks each claim, ranks failure modes by impact × likelihood × cheapness-to-test, and returns the cheapest test and kill criteria for each. Use when stress-testing a plan, pressure-testing a strategy, challenging assumptions, or preparing a doc for executive review.
tools
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
development
The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.
testing
Comprehensive PM resume review and tailoring against 10 best practices including XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, job-specific tailoring, and structure. Use when reviewing a PM resume, preparing for job applications, or improving resume impact.