pm-product-discovery/skills/brainstorm-experiments-existing/SKILL.md
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
npx skillsauth add phuryn/pm-skills brainstorm-experiments-existingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Design low-effort experiments to test product assumptions before committing to full implementation.
You are helping a product team design experiments for $ARGUMENTS. The team has a feature idea and assumptions that need validation.
If the user provides files (PRDs, assumption lists, designs), read them first.
The user will describe their idea and assumptions. Work through these steps:
Clarify the idea and assumptions: Confirm what the team wants to build and what they need to validate.
Suggest experiments for each assumption. Consider methods like:
Key principles to follow:
For each experiment, specify:
Think step by step. Present experiments in a clear table or structured format. Save as markdown if substantial.
testing
Red-team a PRD, roadmap, or strategy by attacking its load-bearing assumptions before reality does. Steelmans then attacks each claim, ranks failure modes by impact × likelihood × cheapness-to-test, and returns the cheapest test and kill criteria for each. Use when stress-testing a plan, pressure-testing a strategy, challenging assumptions, or preparing a doc for executive review.
tools
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
development
The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.
testing
Comprehensive PM resume review and tailoring against 10 best practices including XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, job-specific tailoring, and structure. Use when reviewing a PM resume, preparing for job applications, or improving resume impact.