.build/codex/skills/enc1101-curriculum-designer/SKILL.md
Design and generate curriculum materials for college composition courses (ENC1101 and similar). Use when creating syllabi, assignment prompts, rubrics, lesson plans, scaffolded writing sequences, peer review guides, or D2L/LMS-formatted content. Triggers on requests for composition pedagogy, writing assignment design, grading criteria, or freshman writing course materials.
npx skillsauth add organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills enc1101-curriculum-designerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generate pedagogically-sound composition curriculum aligned with WPA Outcomes and transfer-focused writing instruction.
Scaffolded Learning: Build complexity gradually—low-stakes → high-stakes, guided → independent.
Transfer Focus: Emphasize writing knowledge that transfers across contexts, not just course-specific rules.
Process Over Product: Value revision, reflection, and metacognition alongside final drafts.
Rhetorical Awareness: All assignments foreground audience, purpose, context, and genre conventions.
Typical 16-week progression:
# [Assignment Name]
## Overview
[1-2 sentences describing the assignment's purpose and genre]
## Learning Objectives
By completing this assignment, you will:
- [Outcome aligned with WPA Framework]
- [Outcome aligned with WPA Framework]
- [Course-specific skill]
## The Task
[Clear description of what students will produce]
## Audience & Purpose
- **Audience**: [Specific intended readers]
- **Purpose**: [What the writing should accomplish]
## Requirements
- Length: [word/page count]
- Format: [MLA/APA, document type]
- Sources: [requirements if applicable]
## Process Checkpoints
- [ ] [Date]: [Checkpoint 1 - brainstorming/proposal]
- [ ] [Date]: [Checkpoint 2 - draft]
- [ ] [Date]: [Checkpoint 3 - peer review]
- [ ] [Date]: [Final submission]
## Evaluation Criteria
See attached rubric. Key areas:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]
- [Criterion 3]
Use analytic rubrics with 4-5 levels. Standard categories:
| Criterion | Excellent (A) | Proficient (B) | Developing (C) | Beginning (D) | Missing (F) | |-----------|---------------|----------------|----------------|---------------|-------------| | Focus & Thesis | Clear, arguable, sophisticated | Clear and arguable | Present but vague | Unclear or missing | Not present | | Development | Rich, relevant support | Adequate support | Some support | Minimal support | No support | | Organization | Logical, seamless flow | Clear structure | Some structure | Disorganized | No structure | | Style & Voice | Engaging, appropriate | Appropriate | Inconsistent | Inappropriate | Absent | | Conventions | Nearly error-free | Few errors | Some errors | Many errors | Impedes reading |
See references/rubric-templates.md for full rubric examples.
Every major assignment should include:
Week 1: Assignment introduction + invention activities
Week 2: Exploratory draft (ungraded) + in-class workshop
Week 3: Full draft due → Peer review
Week 4: Revision + Final submission + Reflection
For D2L content pages, use clean HTML:
<h2>Assignment Overview</h2>
<p>[Introduction paragraph]</p>
<h3>Due Dates</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Draft:</strong> [Date]</li>
<li><strong>Final:</strong> [Date]</li>
</ul>
<h3>Submission Instructions</h3>
<ol>
<li>Save as .docx or .pdf</li>
<li>Use filename format: LastName_Assignment1.docx</li>
<li>Submit via Dropbox folder</li>
</ol>
50-minute class:
Opening (5 min): Warm-up writing or discussion prompt
Mini-lesson (15 min): Concept introduction with examples
Activity (20 min): Guided practice or collaborative work
Closure (10 min): Debrief, questions, preview next class
75-minute class:
Opening (5 min): Warm-up
Mini-lesson (20 min): Concept with modeling
Activity 1 (20 min): Guided practice
Break/Transition (5 min)
Activity 2 (20 min): Application or peer work
Closure (5 min): Takeaways and preview
references/wpa-outcomes.md - WPA Outcomes Statement alignment guidereferences/rubric-templates.md - Complete rubric examples for each assignment typereferences/peer-review-guides.md - Structured peer review worksheetsdevelopment
Dry-run audit + targeted cleanup for shell command history. Currently wraps atuin (stats today, prune, dedup with dated preview artifacts); extensible to zsh/bash/mcfly backends. Always previews before applying — apply commands are echoed for the human to run, never auto-executed. Triggers on "/shell-history-hygiene", "audit atuin", "audit shell history", "clean shell history", "atuin prune", "atuin dedup", "shell history hygiene", "history cleanup". Replaces ad-hoc one-liners (e.g. `... | tee cmd > file.txt` which wrote two files, swallowed dedup output, and left a junk `cmd` file).
tools
Guided Cowork setup — install role-matched plugins, connect your tools, try a skill.
development
Manage AI agent session lifecycles with structured phases (FRAME, SHAPE, BUILD, PROVE), context preservation across sessions, handoff protocols, and session metadata tracking. Triggers on session management, agent lifecycle, or multi-session workflow requests.
tools
Parse a session transcript into a structured Session Governance Index — an annotated bibliography of every file modified and commit made, internal-energy accounting (tool uses, estimated tokens), shipped-vs-tasked atom tally, and classification of missing items as Gaps or Vacuums. Triggers on "visibility-schema-substrate-sweep", "session cascade audit", "session governance audit", or any request to summarize what a session actually produced versus what it was asked to produce.