openclaw/1kalin/afrexai-tech-debt-audit

Technical Debt Audit

Systematic technical debt assessment for engineering teams. Identifies, scores, and prioritizes debt across your codebase with business impact analysis and remediation roadmaps.

What It Does

1. Debt Discovery — Categorizes debt: architecture, code quality, dependency, testing, infrastructure, documentation
2. Impact Scoring — Rates each item on effort (1-5), risk (1-5), and business impact (1-5) using a weighted formula
3. Cost Modeling — Estimates carrying cost per sprint in developer-hours and dollars
4. Remediation Roadmap — Generates a prioritized paydown plan with quick wins, scheduled work, and strategic rewrites
5. Executive Summary — One-page board-ready report showing debt-to-velocity ratio and projected savings

Usage

Describe your system, stack, and known pain points. The agent audits systematically:

"Audit our technical debt. We're a Node.js/React SaaS with 180K LOC, 
12 engineers. Known issues: monolithic API, no integration tests, 
3 deprecated dependencies, manual deployments."

Scoring Formula

Priority Score = (Risk × 3) + (Business Impact × 2) + (1/Effort × 1)

Higher score = fix first. Quick wins (low effort, high risk) surface to the top.

Debt Categories

| Category | Examples | Typical Carrying Cost | |----------|----------|----------------------| | Architecture | Monoliths, tight coupling, wrong patterns | 15-25% velocity drag | | Code Quality | Duplication, god classes, no standards | 10-20% velocity drag | | Dependencies | Outdated libs, security vulns, EOL frameworks | 5-15% + incident risk | | Testing | No tests, flaky tests, manual QA only | 20-40% bug-fix overhead | | Infrastructure | Manual deploys, no monitoring, snowflake servers | 10-30% ops overhead | | Documentation | No onboarding docs, tribal knowledge | 2-4 weeks per new hire |

Output Format

# Technical Debt Audit Report
## Executive Summary
- Total debt items: [N]
- Estimated carrying cost: $[X]/month
- Debt-to-velocity ratio: [X]%
- Quick wins available: [N] items, [X] dev-days

## Critical (Fix This Sprint)
...

## High Priority (Next 30 Days)  
...

## Scheduled (Next Quarter)
...

## Strategic (Plan & Budget)
...

## Remediation Roadmap
Week 1-2: [Quick wins]
Month 1: [High priority]
Quarter: [Scheduled items]

Why This Matters

Engineering teams spend 23-42% of development time on technical debt (Stripe Developer Report). Most don't measure it. What you don't measure, you can't manage.

Built by AfrexAI — AI-powered business operations tools.

Need the full engineering context pack? Browse our AI Context Packs ($47) or try the free AI Revenue Calculator.